{"id":9432,"date":"2018-08-17T14:47:10","date_gmt":"2018-08-17T14:47:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=9432"},"modified":"2018-08-24T08:30:22","modified_gmt":"2018-08-24T08:30:22","slug":"studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Votarea amnistiei capitalului: guvernarea a spus \u201eda\u201d, de\u0219i to\u021bi ceilal\u021bi \u2013 \u201eba\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>De\u0219i comunitatea exper\u021bilor economici, societatea civil\u0103, partenerii externi ai \u021b\u0103rii \u0219i misiunile diplomatice au spus distinct c\u0103 nu sus\u021bin amnistia capitalului, guvernarea totu\u0219i a adoptat legea respectiv\u0103 \u00een data de 26 iulie. Votat\u0103 \u00een dou\u0103 lecturi \u00een aceea\u0219i zi, f\u0103r\u0103 o dezbatere public\u0103, legea amnistierii capitalului a fost reflectat\u0103 c\u00e2t se poate de diferit de pres\u0103, iar unele institu\u021bii (NTV Moldova, Accent TV) au politizat subiectul, folosindu-l drept instrument pentru a discredita anumite partide politice.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Canal 2<\/strong> nu a reflectat \u00een \u0219tiri pe 26 iulie informa\u021bia despre adoptarea legii amnistiei fiscale. \u00cen schimb, \u00een buletinul <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-9271 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"421\" height=\"353\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/2.png 940w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/2-350x293.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 421px) 100vw, 421px\" \/><\/a>principal din 27 iulie, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canal2.md\/emisiuni\/reporter-cu-diana-spatarel-27-iulie-2018-1900_91213.html\"><strong>Canal 2<\/strong><\/a> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri despre subiectul monitorizat. \u00cen \u0219tirea \u201eProtest la Parlament\u201d a fost reflectat protestul PAS, PPDA \u0219i PLDM \u00eempotriva adopt\u0103rii acestei legi, fiind men\u021bionate \u0219i reac\u021biile negative ale organiza\u021biilor \u0219i institu\u021biilor interna\u021bionale. Totu\u0219i, \u00een aceea\u0219i \u0219tire opiniile negative sunt contrapuse cu una pozitiv\u0103, a unui expert interna\u021bional care men\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 aceasta este o lege bun\u0103. \u00cen baza unei singure p\u0103reri pozitive, <strong>Canal 2<\/strong> a <strong>generalizat<\/strong> \u0219i a f\u0103cut trimitere la <strong>surse imposibil de verificat<\/strong>, suger\u00e2nd c\u0103 legea se bucur\u0103 de o sus\u021binere masiv\u0103: <em>\u201e<strong>mai mul\u021bi exper\u021bi<\/strong>, <strong>dar \u0219i mediul de afaceri<\/strong> au salutat ini\u021biativa statului&#8230;\u201d<\/em>. Totodat\u0103, <strong>Canal 2<\/strong> a f\u0103cut uz de <strong>tehnica de manipulare a \u201edu\u0219manului intern<\/strong>\u201d, cele 3 partide fiind portretizate drept \u201edu\u0219manii\u201d ce se opun reformelor \u0219i adopt\u0103rii unor legi \u201e&#8230;<em>care ar putea aduce mai mul\u021bi bani la buget \u0219i va contribui la majorarea salariilor\u201d. <\/em>Astfel, toate opiniile dezaprobatoare au fost unificate \u00eentr-un singur material \u0219i au fost echilibrate cu contra-argumente, pentru a crea o impresie de egalitate \u00eentre exponen\u021bii celor dou\u0103 tabere.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/canal-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-9433\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/canal-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"419\" height=\"235\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/canal-2.png 568w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/canal-2-350x196.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 419px) 100vw, 419px\" \/><\/a>\u0218tirea imediat urm\u0103toare, intitulat\u0103 \u201eAmnistia capitalului: O practic\u0103 interna\u021bional\u0103\u201d, a relatat despre un raport al organiza\u021biei Transparency International care men\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 amnistia fiscal\u0103 este o practic\u0103 bun\u0103 \u0219i eficient\u0103, folosit\u0103 la nivel interna\u021bional de \u021b\u0103ri precum Australia, Italia, Grecia \u0219i Turcia. Astfel, <strong>Canal 2<\/strong> a \u00eencercat un <strong>transfer de imagine <\/strong>\u0219i de<strong> justificare<\/strong> a adopt\u0103rii acestei legi, f\u0103c\u00e2nd abstrac\u021bie de diferen\u021bele semnificative dintre \u021bara noastr\u0103 \u0219i statele respective. Informa\u021bia de context a fost prezentat\u0103 pentru a justifica adoptarea legii, prezent\u00e2nd \u00een detaliu beneficiile realizate \u00een \u021b\u0103rile respective. Totodat\u0103, nu au fost prezentate posibilele probleme (<strong>tehnica de manipulare prin omisiune<\/strong>) care pot ap\u0103rea la aplicarea amnistiei fiscale \u0219i care au fost explicate anterior de mai multe institu\u021bii na\u021bionale \u0219i interna\u021bionale, societatea civil\u0103 \u0219i exper\u021bi. Ca \u0219i \u00een \u0219tirea precedent\u0103, <strong>Canal 2<\/strong> a f\u0103cut trimitere la <strong>surse imposibil de verificat<\/strong>, deoarece nu a men\u021bionat despre ce raport al Transparency International este vorba \u0219i nu a prezentat sursa acestuia.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen ziua de 27 iulie, <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a reflectat subiectul vot\u0103rii amnistiei fiscale ca \u0219i <strong>Canal 2<\/strong>, \u00een dou\u0103 \u0219tiri care creioneaz\u0103 \u00een mod similar dou\u0103 tabere de opinie: pro \u0219i contra adopt\u0103rii legii. Materialele au urmat acela\u0219i scenariu, tematic\u0103, unghi de abordare, text \u0219i imagine ca \u0219i \u00een cazul <strong>Canal 2<\/strong>. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/nemultumiti-de-reducerea-taxelor-si-impozitelor-pentru-cetateni-pas-ppda-si-pldm-au-protestat-in-fata-parlamentului_3014268.html\">Prima din ele<\/a> (\u201eNemul\u021bumi\u021bi de reducerea taxelor \u0219i impozitelor pentru cet\u0103\u021beni, PAS, PPDA \u015fi PLDM au protestat \u00een fa\u021ba Parlamentului\u201d), a men\u021bionat despre protestul PAS, PPDA \u0219i PLDM \u00eempotriva adopt\u0103rii acestei legi \u0219i reac\u021bia negativ\u0103 a organiza\u021biilor \u0219i institu\u021biilor interna\u021bionale, urmate de opinia aprobatoare a unui expert interna\u021bional. <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Tehnica de manipulare a \u201edu\u0219manului intern\u201d<\/strong>: cele trei partide men\u021bionate sunt prezentate \u00eentr-un context negativ, ca fiind ni\u0219te entit\u0103\u021bi care se opun reformelor \u0219i adopt\u0103rii unor legi care vor aduce beneficii cet\u0103\u021benilor. O tehnic\u0103 foarte des utilizat\u0103 de mass-media autohtone, pentru a le induce cet\u0103\u021benilor un sentiment de fric\u0103 \u0219i\/sau angoas\u0103.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare \u0219i amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201eCriticile vin \u00een timp ce mai mul\u021bi exper\u021bi economici, precum \u015fi reprezentan\u021bi ai mediul de afaceri, au salutat ini\u021biativa statului, care, potrivit lor, va aduce mai mul\u021bi bani la bugetul de stat \u0219i va duce la majorarea salariilor\u201d;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103\/opinie<\/strong>. Chiar dac\u0103 <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a pus accentul pe faptul c\u0103 cele trei partide au protestat (aten\u021bie \u0219i la titlul \u0219i burtiera din \u0219tire: \u201ePAS, PPDA, PLDM au protestat din nou la Parlament\u201d), acest post de televiziune nu a inclus nicio opinie a protestatarilor.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/amnistia-fiscala-practica-folosita-in-mai-multe-tari-ce-presupune-si-cine-beneficiaza_3014211.html\">A doua \u0219tire<\/a> (\u201eAmnistia fiscal\u0103, practic\u0103 folosit\u0103 \u00een mai multe \u021b\u0103ri. Ce presupune \u0219i cine beneficiaz\u0103\u201d) a fost despre un<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/publika.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-9434 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/publika.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"517\" height=\"262\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/publika.png 765w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/publika-350x178.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 517px) 100vw, 517px\" \/><\/a> <em>\u201estudiu al organiza\u021biei Transparency International&#8230; despre amnistia capitalului\u201d<\/em>. Ca \u0219i la postul Canal 2, \u0219tirea a fost o recapitulare a concluziilor acestui studiu, care men\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 amnistia capitalului a adus venituri \u00een bugetul unor \u021b\u0103ri ca Australia, Grecia, Turcia \u0219i Italia. <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a f\u0103cut uz de <strong>tehnica sugestiei<\/strong>, suger\u00e2nd opiniei publice c\u0103 aceast\u0103 reforma va aduce beneficii \u0219i Republicii Moldova. Totodat\u0103, <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> nu a asigurat echilibrul surselor \u0219i opiniilor, or, argumentele mai multor organiza\u021bii na\u021bionale \u0219i interna\u021bionale pentru respingerea unei asemenea m\u0103suri au fost mai numeroase dec\u00e2t cele de sus\u021binere.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=pj3eeeH6W-0\"><strong>TV8<\/strong><\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/protv.md\/stiri\/jurnale-de-stiri\/stirile-pro-tv-de-la-ora-20-00-cu-tatiana-nastas-26-07-2018---2312311.html\"><strong>Pro TV Chi\u0219in\u0103u<\/strong><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/stiri\/live-update-Sedinta-parlamentului-cu-56-de-deputati-in-sala--legislativul-a-inceput-procedura-de-vot-158568.html\"><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong><\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-26-iulie-2018\/\"><strong>Moldova 1<\/strong><\/a> \u00a0au reflectat subiectul amnistiei fiscale neutru \u0219i echidistant. Totu\u0219i, \u00een c\u00e2teva situa\u021bii, au putut fi identificate cazuri de <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201e<strong>s-au gr\u0103bit s\u0103 voteze legea<\/strong>&#8230; cei care nu \u0219i-au declarat veniturile p\u00e2n\u0103 acum o pot face, contribuind la bugetul de stat <strong>cu doar 3 la sut\u0103 <\/strong>din valoarea bunurilor\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e&#8230;documentul ajung\u00e2nd \u00een parlament <strong>cu viteza luminii<\/strong>\u201d. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/aafc3f4615724af4\/jurnalul-orei-19-26-iulie.html\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 26 iulie<\/a>, <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri despre adoptare legii amnistiei fiscale, insist\u00e2nd pe alocuri pe aspectul negativ al acesteia. \u00cen c\u00e2teva cazuri, <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a admis <strong>amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong> \u0219i a aplicat unele determinative (echivalentul <strong>etichet\u0103rii<\/strong>) care semnaleaz\u0103 o atitudine p\u0103rtinitoare a jurnali\u0219tilor: <em>\u201eLegea celor 56 deputa\u021bi ai puterii\u201d<\/em> (burtiera \u0219tirii); <em>\u201e\u00cen timp ce guvernan\u021bii afirm\u0103 c\u0103 legea va stimula economia \u0219i mediul de afaceri, <strong>opozi\u021bia anti-oligarhic\u0103<\/strong> \u0219i societatea civil\u0103 sunt convinse c\u0103 de fapt acum are loc legalizarea miliardului de dolari furat din sistemul bancar la finele lui 2014\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e&#8230;de cealalt\u0103 parte, reprezentan\u021bii opozi\u021biei <strong>anti-oligarhice<\/strong> au mari dubii \u00een privin\u021ba noii legi\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> \u00een <a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/19259\">buletinul de \u0219tiri din 27 iulie<\/a> a difuzat o \u0219tire \u00a0intitulat\u0103 \u201eGuvernarea, criticat\u0103 din toate p\u0103r\u021bile\u201d, care s-a axat pe criticile aduse legii aprobate. <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a insistat mult pe declara\u021biile \u0219i interpret\u0103rile legii f\u0103cute de reprezentan\u021bii PSRM \u2013 trei fragmente video cu declara\u021biile Zinaidei Greacen\u00eei, pre\u0219edinta PSRM. Citatele acesteia au reprezentat aproape jum\u0103tate din \u0219tire, ceea ce indic\u0103 un <strong>dezechilibru al surselor<\/strong> semnificativ. De asemenea, <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a inclus \u0219i opinia FMI, a Delega\u021biei UE \u0219i a Ambasadei SUA \u00een Republica Moldova, \u00eens\u0103 <strong>nu a oferit dreptul la opinie<\/strong> autorilor legii (reprezentan\u021bilor PDM, \u00een acest caz) \u0219i nici nu au explicat efectiv ce prevede legea votat\u0103 \u00een Parlament. \u00cen ceea ce prive\u0219te modalitatea de citare a surselor, e notabil c\u0103 sursa PSRM a fost citat\u0103 direct, iar argumentele selectate con\u021bineau multe exemple \u0219i informa\u021bii u\u0219or de \u00een\u021beles pentru public, cu trimiteri la experien\u021ba anterioar\u0103 a Zinaidei Grecean\u00eei \u00een calitate de ministr\u0103 a economiei \u0219i prim-ministr\u0103, contur\u00e2nd o imagine profesionist\u0103 \u0219i competent\u0103 (<strong>tehnica eroului salvator<\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/z4iAOms56AM?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; encrypted-media\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Celelalte surse (FMI, \u0219eful Delega\u021biei UE \u00een Moldova) au fost citate indirect, p\u0103str\u00e2ndu-se termenii economici specializa\u021bi, astfel c\u0103 mesajul acestora a fost mai opac \u0219i mai greu de \u00een\u021beles, ca un mesaj de sus\u021binere secundar\u0103 a sursei principale. \u00a0\u00cen afar\u0103 de aceasta, \u0219tirea con\u021bine calificative (<strong>etichete<\/strong>) preluate din citatele surselor: \u201escandaloasa ini\u021biativ\u0103\u201d, \u201escandaloasa lege\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=48680\"><strong>Accent TV<\/strong><\/a> a difuzat o \u0219tire (\u201eLegile marca PDM: S\u0103racii s\u0103r\u0103cesc, boga\u021bii se \u00eembog\u0103\u021besc\u201d) \u00een buletinul informativ din 26 iulie. <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia \u00een mod p\u0103rtinitor \u0219i neechidistant, oferind mai cur\u00e2nd o interpretare a evenimentului dec\u00e2t o relatare a faptului \u00een sine. De asemenea, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a f\u0103cut uz extins de c\u00e2teva tehnici de manipulare:<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/OkyPUds2XnQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; encrypted-media\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Amestecul excesiv al faptelor cu opiniile <\/strong>\u0219i<strong> etichetare:<\/strong> \u201ePropunerile democra\u021bilor privind reducerea impozitului pe venit \u0219i amnistia fiscal\u0103 au devenit subiect de \u0219tiri \u00een Parlament. <strong>Dup\u0103 cum \u0219i era de a\u0219teptat<\/strong>, at\u00e2t cei din PDM c\u00e2t \u0219i <strong>sateli\u021bii s\u0103i<\/strong> nu au avut \u00eentreb\u0103ri la acest subiect. Lucru pe care nu \u00eel putem spune \u0219i de opozi\u021bie. Chiar dac\u0103 au p\u0103r\u0103sit sala de \u0219edin\u021b\u0103, refuz\u00e2nd s\u0103 ia parte la <strong>schemele guvern\u0103rii<\/strong>, sociali\u0219tii <strong>au f\u0103cut una cu p\u0103m\u00e2ntul<\/strong> ideile democra\u021bilor\u201d; <em>\u201eRugat\u0103 s\u0103 comenteze propunerea democra\u021bilor&#8230; lidera PSRM, Zinaida Greacen\u00eei a spus-o <strong>pe \u0219leau<\/strong> c\u0103 proiectul este unul asupra c\u0103ruia planeaz\u0103 mai multe suspiciuni\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e<strong>Interesant este c\u0103<\/strong> de aceste privilegii se pot bucura \u0219i cei ce de\u021bin func\u021bii de demnitate public\u0103, ce-i drept indirect&#8230;\u201d; \u201e<strong>Nu a \u00eenc\u00e2ntat-o<\/strong> pe Grecean\u00eei nici inten\u021bia de a institui impozitul unic pe venit&#8230;\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Politizarea subiectului.<\/strong> PSRM a fost prezentat drept un partid care lupt\u0103 cu guvernarea pentru binele cet\u0103\u021benilor \u0219i al \u021b\u0103rii. <strong>Tehnica de manipulare a Eroului Salvator \u2013 Mesia <\/strong>(\u00een cazul dat, \u201eeroul\u201d fiind PSRM pe post de entitate politic\u0103 care se opune guvern\u0103rii) este folosit de fiecare dat\u0103 c\u00e2nd \u00eentr-o societate anume criza social\u0103, politic\u0103 \u0219i economic\u0103 se \u00eenr\u0103ut\u0103\u021be\u0219te, iar pe fundal este promovat\u0103 idea unui salvator care poate rezolva toate problemele.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Citarea excesiv\u0103 a unor surse<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>neoferirea dreptului la replic\u0103 <\/strong>celor viza\u021bi direct \u00een \u0219tire. Zinaida Grecean\u00eei a fost inclus\u0103 cu trei blocuri de declara\u021bii consecutive (cu un total de 2 minute \u0219i 14 secunde, adic\u0103 aproximativ 50% din \u0219tire au constitut doar declara\u021biile ei, alte 40% fiind parafrazarea acestora de c\u0103tre reporter). Pe de alt\u0103 parte, Guvernul \u0219i PDM, ca partid, au fost viza\u021bi \u0219i acuza\u021bi direct, dar acestora nu li s-a asigurat dreptul la opinie.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Pe parcursul celor dou\u0103 zile de monitorizare, 26 \u0219i 27 iulie, portalul online<strong> Sputnik.md<\/strong> a publicat <a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/opinie\/20180727\/20828592\/amnistia-fiscala-actiune-riscuri-majore.html\">o \u0219tire \u2013 \u201eExpert: Amnistia fiscal\u0103, o ac\u021biune care comport\u0103 riscuri majore\u201d<\/a>, \u00een care a reflectat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a \u00eenc\u0103lca principiile deontologiei jurnalistice \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 a folosi tehnici de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a publicat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26861.7\/3903558\/\">una din acestea<\/a> a fost preluarea integral\u0103 a unei opinii exprimate de Dumitru Barbalat <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/kp.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-9435\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/kp.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"450\" height=\"418\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/kp.png 519w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/kp-350x325.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/a>pe contul s\u0103u personal de Facebook, iar o <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26861.5\/3903663\/\">alt\u0103 \u0219tire<\/a> \u2013 \u201e\u0427\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b \u00ab\u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0430\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044e\u0446\u0438\u044f\u00bb\u201d (Care va fi impactul \u201erevolu\u021biei fiscale\u201d pentru Republica Moldova) a avut drept baz\u0103 informa\u021bia publicat\u0103 de Mold-Street.com. De\u0219i ini\u021bial articolul \u00eencepe ca unul informativ, pe parcurs apar unele judec\u0103\u021bi de valoare specifice unui material de opinie, iar jurnalistul \u00eencercat s\u0103 dea o interpretare personal\u0103 a legilor adoptate \u0219i impactul acestora. Se poate spune, astfel, c\u0103 publica\u021bia a admis <strong>amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201e<strong>Mai mult ca sigur<\/strong> c\u0103 cet\u0103\u021benii de r\u00e2nd nu vor avea niciun beneficiu din <strong>mult-l\u0103udata reform\u0103 fiscal\u0103<\/strong>\u201d<\/em> (\u041d\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043d\u044f\u043a\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u044b\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0442 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0432\u044b\u0433\u043e\u0434\u044b, \u043e\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u0445\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044f\u0435\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u0440\u0435\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u044b).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Noi.md<\/strong> a publicat \u0219ase \u0219tiri despre legea amnistiei fiscale. Patru din ele au fost preluate de la alte institu\u021bii media (<strong>Publika.md<\/strong>, <strong>Unimedia.md<\/strong>, <strong>IPN<\/strong>, \u00a0<strong>Moldova.org<\/strong>), iar dou\u0103 din ele au fost con\u021binut propriu. <a href=\"https:\/\/noi.md\/md\/economie\/fmi-inainteaza-un-cartonas-galben-moldovei\">Una din acestea<\/a> (\u201eFMI \u00eenainteaz\u0103 un \u201dcartona\u0219 galben\u201d Moldovei\u201d) a men\u021bionat despre opinia FMI pe marginea legisla\u021biei aprobate; <a href=\"https:\/\/noi.md\/md\/economie\/ong-urile-ii-solicita-lui-dodon-sa-nu-promulge-legea-privind-amnistia-fiscala\">iar alta<\/a> a reflectat opinia apelul societ\u0103\u021bii civile, care \u00eei cer pre\u0219edintelui Igor Dodon s\u0103 nu promulge acest pachet de legi (\u201eONG-urile \u00eei solicit\u0103 lui Dodon s\u0103 nu promulge Legea privind amnistia fiscal\u0103\u201d). \u00cen ambele \u0219tiri, informa\u021bia a fost expus\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i nu au fost semnalate \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri deontologice sau folosirea tehnicilor de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Context: <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>La 26 iulie 2018, Parlamentul a votat, \u00een cadrul \u0219edin\u021bei plenare, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.parlament.md\/ProcesulLegislativ\/Proiectedeactelegislative\/tabid\/61\/LegislativId\/4329\/language\/ro-RO\/Default.aspx\"><em>proiectul legii nr. 284 privind declararea voluntar\u0103 \u0219i facilitarea fiscal\u0103<\/em><\/a><em>. Legea a fost elaborat\u0103 de c\u00e2\u021biva deputa\u021bi membri ai PDM \u0219i Grupului Popular European din Parlamentul Republicii Moldova. Aceasta a fost avizat\u0103 pozitiv de Guvern \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din 25 iulie \u0219i inclus\u0103 pe agenda Parlamentului \u00een ziua de 26 iulie, fiind votat\u0103 \u00een ambele lecturi de 56 deputa\u021bi (PDM, PPEM). Legea prevede posibilitatea declar\u0103rii bunurilor \u0219i surselor financiare care nu au fost anterior declarate, astfel fiind posibil\u0103 legalizarea acestora, achit\u00e2nd 3% din valoarea acestora. Ini\u021biativa legislativ\u0103 a fost criticat\u0103 de partide parlamentare \u2013 care au p\u0103r\u0103sit \u0219edin\u021ba Parlamentului \u2013, organiza\u021bii ale societ\u0103\u021bii civile, organiza\u021bii \u0219i institu\u021bii interna\u021bionale (FMI, BM) \u0219i misiuni diplomatice din Republica Moldova (Ambasada SUA, Delega\u021bia UE). <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em><strong>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>_______________________\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Acest articol este posibil datorit\u0103 ajutorului generos al poporului american oferit prin intermediul Agen\u021biei SUA pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID). Opiniile exprimate apar\u0163in autorilor \u015fi nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar pozi\u0163ia USAID sau a Guvernului SUA.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>De\u0219i comunitatea exper\u021bilor economici, societatea civil\u0103, partenerii externi ai \u021b\u0103rii \u0219i misiunile diplomatice au spus distinct c\u0103 nu sus\u021bin amnistia capitalului, guvernarea totu\u0219i a adoptat legea respectiv\u0103 \u00een data de 26 iulie. Votat\u0103 \u00een dou\u0103 lecturi \u00een aceea\u0219i zi, f\u0103r\u0103 o dezbatere public\u0103, legea amnistierii capitalului a fost reflectat\u0103 c\u00e2t se poate de diferit de<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":9436,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Votarea amnistiei capitalului: guvernarea a spus \u201eda\u201d, de\u0219i to\u021bi ceilal\u021bi \u2013 \u201eba\u201d - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"De\u0219i comunitatea exper\u021bilor economici, societatea civil\u0103, partenerii externi ai \u021b\u0103rii \u0219i misiunile diplomatice au spus distinct c\u0103 nu sus\u021bin amnistia capitalului, guvernarea totu\u0219i a adoptat legea respectiv\u0103 \u00een data de 26 iulie. Votat\u0103 \u00een dou\u0103 lecturi \u00een aceea\u0219i zi, f\u0103r\u0103 o dezbatere public\u0103, legea amnistierii capitalului a fost reflectat\u0103 c\u00e2t se poate de diferit deMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-17T14:47:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-24T08:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/cover-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"680\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"382\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/cover-2.png\",\"width\":680,\"height\":382},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Votarea amnistiei capitalului: guvernarea a spus \\u201eda\\u201d, de\\u0219i to\\u021bi ceilal\\u021bi \\u2013 \\u201eba\\u201d - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-17T14:47:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-24T08:30:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-votarea-amnistiei-capitalului-guvernarea-spus-da-desi-toti-ceilalti-ba\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9432"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9432"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9432\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9462,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9432\/revisions\/9462"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9436"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}