{"id":7501,"date":"2017-09-29T12:05:18","date_gmt":"2017-09-29T12:05:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=7501"},"modified":"2017-10-11T12:13:11","modified_gmt":"2017-10-11T12:13:11","slug":"banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Banalizarea semnifica\u021biei zilelor de 27 \u0219i 31 august \u00een discursul media"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>Reflectarea \u00een pres\u0103 a semnifica\u021biei istorice \u0219i a festivit\u0103\u021bilor cu ocazia Zilei Independen\u021bei (27 august ) \u0219i a Zilei Limbii Rom\u00e2ne (31 august) au avut o serie de caracteristici curioase. Astfel, o bun\u0103 parte din pres\u0103 a ar\u0103tat \u00een prim-plan oficialit\u0103\u021bile, fie cele de la guvern \u0219i parlament, fie cele de la pre\u0219edin\u021bie \u0219i cele<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26723\/3749462\/\" target=\"_blank\"><em> local<\/em><\/a><em><u><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26723\/3749462\/\" target=\"_blank\">e<\/a>. <\/u><\/em><em>O alt\u0103 parte din pres\u0103 a omis sau ignorat semnifica\u021bia istoric\u0103 a zilelor respective. Totodat\u0103, unele institu\u021bii de pres\u0103 nu au putut rezista tenta\u021biei de a reflecta cronologia celor 26 de ani de independen\u021b\u0103 printr-o serie de articole-schi\u021b\u0103 care ilustrau fiecare an printr-un singur eveniment, cre\u00e2nd o imagine excesiv de simplist\u0103 asupra lucrurilor &#8211; un \u0219ablon.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>O parte din presa de limba rus\u0103 a ignorat inten\u021bionat semnifica\u021bia celor dou\u0103 s\u0103rb\u0103tori \u0219i \u0219i-a concentrat aten\u021bia asupra concertului organizat de pre\u0219edintele Igor Dodon cu ocazia celei de-a 73-a anivers\u0103ri de la lansarea opera\u021biei Ia\u0219i-Chi\u0219in\u0103u. Paradoxal, dar nici \u00een epoca sovietic\u0103 \u00een RSSM aceast\u0103 zi nu era marcat\u0103 dec\u00e2t la date jubiliare, iar \u00een unii ani, a\u0219a ca \u00een 1971, presa de partid nu a evocat deloc istoricul zilei respective.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen contextul Zilei Independen\u021bei, Kp.md \u00eencepe s\u0103 publice un \u0219ir de articole tematice. Astfel, pe 24 <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/1.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-7502\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-7502\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/1-280x350.jpg\" alt=\"1\" width=\"280\" height=\"350\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/1-280x350.jpg 280w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/1.jpg 330w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 280px) 100vw, 280px\" \/><\/a>august jurnalista Lidia Tkaci semneaz\u0103 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26722.4\/3747612\/\" target=\"_blank\">un text care nu are leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu independen\u021ba<\/a>, de\u0219i titlul textului face trimitere la aceasta:\u00a0 \u201e\u00cen preajma Zilei independen\u021bei Moldovei: Plec\u0103m de la prostie \u0219i lipsa de justi\u021bie\u201d. De facto, jurnalista se refer\u0103 la lipsa de solu\u021bii pentru cei care sunt nevoi\u021bi s\u0103 plece peste hotare. Al\u0103turarea aceasta este for\u021bat\u0103, deoarece \u00eei proiecteaz\u0103 cititorului mai pu\u021bin critic sau neatent ideea c\u0103 acele cauze care \u00eei fac pe oameni s\u0103 emigreze pentru totdeauna, \u0219i care de regul\u0103 sunt s\u0103r\u0103cia, corup\u021bia sau\/\u0219i lipsa de perspectiv\u0103, ar fi legate cumva de independen\u021ba statului din care pleac\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen aceea\u0219i zi a fost publicat \u0219i un text care \u00eencearc\u0103 s\u0103 induc\u0103 o fric\u0103 patologic\u0103 vorbitorilor de limba rus\u0103 din R. Moldova. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26722.4\/3747681\/\" target=\"_blank\">Acest articol<\/a>, care constituie o preluare din ziarul <em>Diaspora<\/em> din Sacramento (Statele Unite), reflect\u0103 <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/2.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-7503\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-7503 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/2-257x350.jpg\" alt=\"2\" width=\"257\" height=\"350\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/2-257x350.jpg 257w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/2.jpg 336w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 257px) 100vw, 257px\" \/><\/a>opiniile unui grup de concet\u0103\u021beni pleca\u021bi la \u00eenceputul anilor \u201990. Titlul este provocator: \u201eEmigran\u021bii moldoveni din SUA: Pr\u0103bu\u0219irea URSS a fost o tragedie, oamenii de parc\u0103 s-au schimbat \u00eentr-o zi, \u00een Chi\u0219in\u0103u puteai fi b\u0103tut \u0219i chiar omor\u00e2t pentru limba rus\u0103\u201d. L\u0103s\u00e2nd la o parte faptul c\u0103 fiecare e \u00een drept s\u0103 aprecieze c\u0103derea URSS dup\u0103 cum consider\u0103, acuza\u021bia din a doua parte din titlu este pasibil\u0103 de pedeaps\u0103 administrativ\u0103. \u00cen momentul \u00een care <em>Komsomolskaia pravda v Moldove <\/em>public\u0103 asemenea acuza\u021bii despre omor motivat etnic, chiar dac\u0103 e o preluare, \u00ee\u0219i asum\u0103 acest mesaj \u0219i ar trebui s\u0103 vin\u0103 cu probe \u0219i factologie \u2013 sau s\u0103 poarte responsabilitate pentru cele ce le pretinde. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, este u\u0219or ironic faptul c\u0103 publica\u021bia alege s\u0103 preia sub acest titlu nostalgic dup\u0103 URSS ni\u0219te texte ale unor concet\u0103\u021beni pleca\u021bi tocmai \u00een statul care, conform discursului ideologizat din Federa\u021bia Rus\u0103, ar fi contribuit la destr\u0103marea URSS.<\/p>\n<p>La 25 august, Tatiana Vladimirskaia a propus o <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26722\/3748199\/\" target=\"_blank\">retrospectiv\u0103<\/a> a celor 26 de ani de independen\u021b\u0103, intitulat\u0103 semnificativ \u201ePrin ce s-a memorat Moldova contemporan\u0103: orice s-a f\u0103cut, a fost spre&#8230; mai r\u0103u\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>La 26 august, Sputnik.md, \u00een versiunea de limb\u0103 rus\u0103, a popularizat opinia ex-deputatului Trombi\u021bki despre circumstan\u021b<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-3.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-7504\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-7504\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-3-350x191.jpg\" alt=\"sputnik\" width=\"350\" height=\"191\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-3-350x191.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-3.jpg 896w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a>ele adopt\u0103rii Declara\u021biei de Independen\u021b\u0103 \u2013 \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/ru.sputnik.md\/news\/20170826\/14234374\/deni-nezavisimosti-moldovy-deklarazia-onezavisimosti.html\" target=\"_blank\">P\u0103rere: cum a fost adoptat\u0103 \u00een 1991 declara\u021bia de Independen\u021b\u0103<\/a>\u201d. Acesta consider\u0103 c\u0103 Declara\u021bia a fost adoptat\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 discu\u021bii \u0219i cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea grav\u0103 a regulamentului Parlamentului. Textul con\u021bine \u0219i alte aprecieri discutabile. Chiar dac\u0103 este un editorial, publica\u021bia nu-l echilibreaz\u0103 cu alte materiale de opinie ce transmit puncte de vedere alternative, proiect\u00e2nd astfel cititorului o imagine unilateral\u0103 care \u0219tirbe\u0219te din importan\u021ba adopt\u0103rii Declara\u021biei de Independen\u021b\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>La 27 august, ziarul <em>Komsomolskaia pravda v Moldove<\/em> a publicat <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26723.7\/3749014\/\" target=\"_blank\">o retrospectiv\u0103<\/a> mai veche a lui Valerii Demide\u021bki despre pre\u0219edin\u021bii care s-au perindat la conducerea Moldovei din 1991 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2016. Dincolo de multele aspecte ce pot fi discutate \u00een mandatele acestor pre\u0219edin\u021bi, ata\u0219area fiec\u0103ruia din ace\u0219tia a unor etichete \u2013 \u201ecolhoznic\u201d, \u201eapparatcik\u201d, \u201ecomunist\u201d \u0219i \u201emarele mut\u201d \u2013 contribuie la denaturarea realit\u0103\u021bii. Or,\u00a0 \u00een doar c\u00e2teva cuvinte se comprim\u0103 mai mult de dou\u0103 decenii de evenimente, realiz\u0103ri \u0219i e\u0219ecuri, chiar dac\u0103 acestea din urm\u0103 sunt mai numeroase \u0219i ofer\u0103 destule motive de nemul\u021bumire.<\/p>\n<p>Textul scris de Demide\u021bki e \u00een stil eseistic, generalist \u0219i se cite\u0219te u\u0219or, ceea ce \u00eel face accesibil \u0219i atractiv pentru o parte a publicului larg.<\/p>\n<p>Un alt tip de retrospectiv\u0103 laconic\u0103 a \u201eindependen\u021belor\u201d a putut fi g\u0103sit\u0103 pe versiunea rus\u0103 a portalului Sputnik.md (\u00een versiunea rom\u00e2n\u0103 sunt doar articole descriptive sau neutre) \u2013 \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/ru.sputnik.md\/moldova\/20170827\/14248922\/ot-dragosha-do-nashih-dnej-skolko-nezavisimostej-bylo-u-moldovy.html\" target=\"_blank\">De la Drago\u0219 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een zilele noastre: c\u00e2te \u201eindependen\u021be\u201d a avut Moldova<\/a>\u201d. \u00cen \u0219irul celor 8 \u201eindependen\u021be\u201d autorul include \u0219i evenimente care nu corespund sensului acestui cuv\u00e2nd \u2013 anexarea Basarabiei \u00een mai 1812, crearea RASSM \u00een octombrie 1924 \u0219i a RSSM la 2 august 1940. Aceast\u0103 \u00een\u0219iruire care \u00eencepe cu epoca medievala \u0219i se \u00eencheie cu 27 august 1991, con\u021bine cele trei date men\u021bionate mai sus, care pentru cititorul neavizat ar putea fi astfel investite cu valoarea de da<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-2-1.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-7505\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-7505 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-2-1-350x189.jpg\" alt=\"sputnik 2\" width=\"350\" height=\"189\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-2-1-350x189.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/sputnik-2-1.jpg 811w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a>te de \u201eindependen\u021b\u0103\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Kp.md\u00a0 a venit cu o <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26723.7\/3749013\/\" target=\"_blank\">preluare<\/a>, din <em>Tribuna<\/em>, textul fiind semnat de Dumitru Sp\u0103taru, cu titlul \u201eDe ce Republica Moldova a e\u0219uat ca stat. Sunt mai multe cauze \u0219i fiecare din ele are greutate\u201d. Articolul vine s\u0103 completeze imaginea general\u0103 creionat\u0103 \u00een materialele precedente, una de disperare \u0219i e\u0219ec.<\/p>\n<p>La sf\u00e2r\u0219itul lunii august, \u00een articolele de pe <em>KP.md<\/em> s-au remarcat dou\u0103 materiale de opinie a c\u0103ror agresivitate nu mai putea fi atenuat\u0103 de tradi\u021bionalele \u00eendemnuri din \u00eencheiere de a tr\u0103i \u00een pace, articolele fiind semnate de Nikita Zverev. Astfel, autorul amestec\u0103 unele aspecte \u0219i opinii reale \u0219i pertinente cu p\u0103reri exagerate, radicale, anti-ruse, exprimate mai ales pe Facebook (dar f\u0103r\u0103 a da numele concret al autorilor acestora, de\u0219i post\u0103rile sunt publice). \u00cen final, se promoveaz\u0103 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26723.5\/3749192\/\" target=\"_blank\">ideea<\/a> c\u0103 la \u00eenceputul anilor \u201990 \u00een Moldova ar fi fost agresa\u021bi \u00een strad\u0103 preponderent vorbitorii de limb\u0103 rus\u0103, iar rom\u00e2n\u0103 ar fi o limb\u0103 care nu se d\u0103 \u00eenv\u0103\u021bat\u0103, explica\u021bia fiind una aproape mistic\u0103 (exemplul colegului care merge de dou\u0103 decenii la cursuri \u0219i nu a reu\u0219it s\u0103 \u00eenve\u021be limba) \u2013 vezi textul \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26723.7\/3748990\/\" target=\"_blank\">De ce \u00een decurs de 26 de ani nu am \u00eenv\u0103\u021bat limba de stat<\/a>\u201d. Articolul se \u00eencheie, invariabil, cu specificarea c\u0103 textul publicat nu reflect\u0103 neap\u0103rat punctul de vedere al redac\u021biei. <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/kp-3.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-7506\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-7506\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/kp-3-283x350.jpg\" alt=\"kp 3\" width=\"283\" height=\"350\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/kp-3-283x350.jpg 283w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/kp-3.jpg 335w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 283px) 100vw, 283px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00cen concluzie, remarc\u0103m faptul c\u0103 la modul general reflectarea \u00een pres\u0103 a s\u0103rb\u0103torilor de 27 \u0219i 31 august a fost una neglijent\u0103, ceea ce a sc\u0103zut importan\u021ba istoric\u0103 \u0219i a alterat esen\u021ba evenimentelor (mai ales pentru genera\u021bia care a crescut \u00een acest r\u0103stimp). Au existat multe reflect\u0103ri la nivel de program, festivit\u0103\u021bi, felicit\u0103ri, comunicate. Pe acest fundal se distinge num\u0103rul considerabil de texte ap\u0103rute \u00een varianta electronic\u0103 a ziarului <em>Komsomolskaia pravda v Moldove<\/em>. De\u0219i textele men\u021bionate sunt diferite, unele fiind mai pu\u021bin legate de independen\u021b\u0103 sau limb\u0103, ci de anumite fenomene, amintiri sau stereotipuri, prin titluri, prin emo\u021bii \u0219i interpret\u0103ri este exprimat\u0103 o atitudine de nesiguran\u021b\u0103, relativizare, nedumerire, ne\u00een\u021belegere sau dezam\u0103gire fa\u021b\u0103 de ob\u021binerea independen\u021bei \u00een 1991.<\/p>\n<p>Pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 acestea, sunt \u0219i c\u00e2teva accente mai radicale, prin care se promoveaz\u0103 deschis ideea c\u0103 independen\u021ba a fost o catastrof\u0103 \u0219i un e\u0219ec. Imaginea este completat\u0103 de cele dou\u0103 materiale de pe Sputnik.md \u00een limba rus\u0103, care pun accentul pe aspectul istoric \u00eens\u0103 manipuleaz\u0103 faptele: \u00eei induc cititorului care nu cunoa\u0219te detaliile ideea c\u0103 ar mai fi existat ni\u0219te independen\u021be anterioare \u00een perioada \u021barist\u0103 \u0219i sovietic\u0103, iar la 27 august 1991 nu ar fi fost respectate procedurile de discu\u021bie \u0219i votare a textului Declara\u021biei de Independen\u021b\u0103, \u00een baza c\u0103reia s-a constituit ca stat Republica Moldova.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>Marius T\u0103r\u00ee\u021b\u0103, doctor \u00een istorie<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Articolul a fost realizat de Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent \u00een cadrul Campaniei media \u00eempotriva informa\u021biei false \u0219i tenden\u021bioase <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/api.md\/category\/stop-fals\" target=\"_blank\"><em>STOP FALS<\/em><\/a><em>!, desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 de Asocia\u021bia Presei Independente (API), Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) \u0219i Asocia\u021bia VIP a Telejurnali\u0219tilor Independen\u021bi din Moldova (ATVJI).<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reflectarea \u00een pres\u0103 a semnifica\u021biei istorice \u0219i a festivit\u0103\u021bilor cu ocazia Zilei Independen\u021bei (27 august ) \u0219i a Zilei Limbii Rom\u00e2ne (31 august) au avut o serie de caracteristici curioase. Astfel, o bun\u0103 parte din pres\u0103 a ar\u0103tat \u00een prim-plan oficialit\u0103\u021bile, fie cele de la guvern \u0219i parlament, fie cele de la pre\u0219edin\u021bie \u0219i cele<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":7507,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Banalizarea semnifica\u021biei zilelor de 27 \u0219i 31 august \u00een discursul media - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Reflectarea \u00een pres\u0103 a semnifica\u021biei istorice \u0219i a festivit\u0103\u021bilor cu ocazia Zilei Independen\u021bei (27 august ) \u0219i a Zilei Limbii Rom\u00e2ne (31 august) au avut o serie de caracteristici curioase. Astfel, o bun\u0103 parte din pres\u0103 a ar\u0103tat \u00een prim-plan oficialit\u0103\u021bile, fie cele de la guvern \u0219i parlament, fie cele de la pre\u0219edin\u021bie \u0219i celeMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-29T12:05:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-11T12:13:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/cover-13.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"588\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"389\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/cover-13.jpg\",\"width\":588,\"height\":389},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/\",\"name\":\"Banalizarea semnifica\\u021biei zilelor de 27 \\u0219i 31 august \\u00een discursul media - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-29T12:05:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-11T12:13:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/banalizarea-semnificatiei-zilelor-de-27-si-31-august-discursul-media\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7501"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7501"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7582,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7501\/revisions\/7582"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}