{"id":6921,"date":"2017-07-18T06:38:43","date_gmt":"2017-07-18T06:38:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=6921"},"modified":"2017-07-25T06:51:09","modified_gmt":"2017-07-25T06:51:09","slug":"studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Prezentare unilateral\u0103, neasigurarea dreptului la replic\u0103 \u0219i informa\u021bii inexacte \u00een \u0219tirile despre prelungirea arestului lui Dorin Chirtoac\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Context: La 22 iunie 2017 Judec\u0103toria Chi\u0219in\u0103u a prelungit cu 25 de zile mandatul de arest la domiciliu al primarului municipiului Chi\u0219in\u0103u, Dorin Chirtoac\u0103, cercetat pentru trafic de influen\u021b\u0103 \u00eentr-un dosar penal privind amenajarea unor parc\u0103ri cu plat\u0103 \u00een Capital\u0103. Evenimentul este relevant pentru opinia public\u0103, pentru c\u0103 vizeaz\u0103 o cauz\u0103 de corup\u021bie, dar \u0219i pentru c\u0103 dup\u0103 pronun\u021barea deciziei \u00eenvinuitul a f\u0103cut <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.privesc.eu\/arhiva\/76860\/Sedinta-de-judecata-a-primarului-municipiului-Chisinau--Dorin-Chirtoaca--din-22-iunie-2017\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>primele<\/strong><\/a><strong> declara\u021bii referitoare la acuza\u021biile aduse de procurori. \u00cen timpul \u0219edin\u021bei instan\u021bei de judecat\u0103, \u00een fa\u021ba sediului Judec\u0103toriei Chi\u0219in\u0103u (Buiucani) un grup de membri \u0219i simpatizan\u021bi ai Partidului Liberal au participat la un miting de sus\u021binere a primarului.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Posturile <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publika.md\/emisiuni\/newsroom_2331_video_4995263.html#gallery\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Publika TV<\/strong><\/a><strong>, <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prime.md\/ro\/ramane-in-arest-dorin-chirtoaca-a-primit-inca-25-de-zile-de-arest-la-domiciliu_57567.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Prime<\/strong><\/a><strong>, <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/ro\/news\/2017\/6\/22\/jurnalul-orei-19-22-iunie-10289560\/#2\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><\/a><strong>, <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ABcjoQqLHDo&amp;t=635s&amp;list=PLUIteKEAZKOuHEI-x2KWAVyl6lAZJgksy&amp;index=47\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"http:\/\/a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=32116\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Accent TV<\/strong><\/a>, precum \u0219i portalurile <a href=\"https:\/\/deschide.md\/ro\/stiri\/social\/13624\/Magistra\u021bii-au-prelungit-mandatul-lui-Chirtoac\u0103-cu-25-de-zile.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Deschide.md<\/strong><\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ziarulnational.md\/live-video-dorin-chirtoaca-primele-declaratii-de-cand-se-afla-in-arest-constiinta-mea-este-curata\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Ziarulnational.md<\/strong><\/a> au reflectat evenimentul \u00een general echidistant, prezent\u00e2nd majoritatea faptelor \u0219i informa\u021biilor din sursele corespunz\u0103toare. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, unele posturi TV \u0219i site-uri cum ar fi <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/11910\" target=\"_blank\">NTV Moldova<\/a><\/strong>, <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.canal2.md\/news\/alte-25-de-zile-de-arest-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca_68174.html\" target=\"_blank\">Canal 2<\/a><\/strong>, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.noi.md\/md\/news_id\/229628\" target=\"_blank\">Noi.md<\/a><\/strong>, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/moldova\/20170622\/13240297\/zi-decisiva-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca-va-iesi-sau-nu-din-arest.html\" target=\"_blank\">Sputnik.md<\/a><\/strong> au reflectat subiectul p\u0103rtinitor.<\/p>\n<p>Postul <a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/11910\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><\/a><strong>,<\/strong> \u00een edi\u021bia de \u0219tiri de la ora 19.00, a transmis principalele informa\u021bii \u0219i pozi\u021biile ambelor p\u0103r\u021bi &#8211; a procurorului \u0219i a acuzatului &#8211; dar nu a transmis nicio informa\u021bie despre mitingul de sus\u021binere organizat de liberali \u00een fa\u021ba Judec\u0103toriei, ceea ce poate fi calificat ca o prezentare selectiv\u0103 a faptelor. De asemenea, de\u0219i reporterii au respectat formal echilibrul surselor, prezent\u00e2nd un fragment din discursul procurorului \u0219i unul din cel al \u00eenvinuitului, primarul a fost u\u0219or dezavantajat. Astfel, din spusele lui Dorin Chirtoac\u0103 a fost ales un fragment mai pu\u021bin relevant raportat la acuza\u021bia de trafic de influen\u021b\u0103 adus\u0103 de procurori. \u201e<em>Faptul c\u0103 s-au f\u0103cut anumite declara\u021bii \u00een ceea ce m\u0103 prive\u0219te, plus alte aspecte care sunt <\/em><em>men\u021bionate<\/em><em>, ele nu au nici o relevan\u021b\u0103 \u0219i sunt chiar absurde, a\u0219 spune<\/em>\u201d &#8211; este singura declara\u021bie cu care a fost citat primarul \u0219i, dup\u0103 cum se vede, ea nu se refer\u0103 \u00een mod direct la acuza\u021bia de trafic de influen\u021b\u0103 care i-a fost adus\u0103 \u0219i pentru care este cercetat penal.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/JzxkvZ2WdWk?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Majoritatea institu\u021biilor de pres\u0103 au transmis <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realitatea.md\/dorin-chirtoaca-va-mai-sta-in-arest-la-domiciliu-inca-25-de-zile--video-_59744.html\" target=\"_blank\">principalul mesaj<\/a> spus de Chirtoac\u0103 dup\u0103 \u0219edin\u021b\u0103: \u201e<em>Nu am f\u0103cut niciun fel de trafic de influen\u021b\u0103 \u0219i nu am f\u0103cut altceva dec\u00e2t s\u0103-mi \u00eendeplinesc atribu\u021biile de serviciu, cu privire la acest caz \u0219i cu privire la toate celelalte. Con\u0219tiin\u021ba mea este curat\u0103. Sper s\u0103 pot convinge at\u00e2t organele de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103, c\u00e2t \u0219i instan\u021bele de judecat\u0103 cu privire la acest lucru<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Putem concluziona c\u0103 reporterii de la NTV au selectat o secven\u021b\u0103 mai pu\u021bin relevant\u0103 din discursul primarului, s-a dorit o estompare a esen\u021bei declara\u021biilor prin care acesta se declar\u0103 nevinovat.<\/p>\n<p>La <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canal2.md\/news\/alte-25-de-zile-de-arest-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca_68174.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Canal 2<\/strong><\/a> \u0219tirea din ziua \u0219edin\u021bei de judecat\u0103 nu a inclus declara\u021biile f\u0103cute de primar dup\u0103 pronun\u021barea deciziei de prelungire a arestului la domiciliu, fapt ce poate fi explicat prin ora la care a fost difuzat\u0103 \u0219tirea (16.00). Postul <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canal2.md\/news\/inca-25-de-zile-de-arest-la-domiciliu-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca_68208.html\" target=\"_blank\">a transmis pozi\u021bia primarului<\/a>, care s-a declarat nevinovat \u0219i a negat c\u0103 ar fi comis trafic de influen\u021b\u0103, a doua zi. <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/canal-2-1.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-6923\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-6923\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/canal-2-1-350x265.jpg\" alt=\"canal 2\" width=\"376\" height=\"285\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/canal-2-1-350x265.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/canal-2-1.jpg 587w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 376px) 100vw, 376px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>La finalul \u0219tirii difuzate pe 23 iunie, intitulate \u201e<a href=\"http:\/\/www.canal2.md\/news\/inca-25-de-zile-de-arest-la-domiciliu-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca_68208.html\" target=\"_blank\">\u00cenc\u0103 25 de zile de arest la domiciliu pentru Dorin Chirtoac\u0103<\/a>\u201d, a fost inclus alineatul \u201e<em>Dorin Chirtoac\u0103 a fost re\u021binut luna trecut\u0103 \u00een dosarul parc\u0103rilor cu plat\u0103. Procurorii sus\u021bin c\u0103 primarului urma s\u0103-i revin\u0103 13 la sut\u0103 din afacerea cu parc\u0103rile, \u00een schimbul promov\u0103rii proiectului dirijat din umbr\u0103 de milionarul Alexandru Pincevschi<\/em>\u201d. Acest pasaj con\u021bine dou\u0103 acuza\u021bii &#8211; la adresa primarului \u0219i la adresa omului de afaceri Alexandru Pincevschi &#8211; care nu au fost echilibrate \u00een \u0219tire prin opinia\/dreptul la replic\u0103 al celor viza\u021bi. \u00cen primul caz, Chirtoac\u0103 a respins, printr-o declara\u021bie f\u0103cut\u0103 jurnali\u0219tilor pe 22 iunie pe holul Judec\u0103toriei, faptul c\u0103 ar fi urmat s\u0103 primeasc\u0103 13 la sut\u0103 din valoarea tranzac\u021biei. \u00cen al doilea caz, care \u021bine de acuza\u021bia c\u0103 Pincevschi \u201edirija din umbr\u0103\u201d proiectul parc\u0103rii, a fost necesar comentariul celui vizat. Mai exact, bunele practici jurnalistice arat\u0103 c\u0103 oric\u0103rei persoane pomenite \u00eentr-un material \u00een context negativ trebuie s\u0103 \u00eei fie asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103. \u00cen plus, expunerea pozi\u021biei p\u0103r\u021bii acuzate ar putea dezv\u0103lui informa\u021bii noi care ar putea schimba \u0219tirea, dar \u0219i ar aduce mai mult\u0103 claritate pentru consumator.<\/p>\n<p>Portalul <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/moldova\/20170622\/13240297\/zi-decisiva-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca-va-iesi-sau-nu-din-arest.html\" target=\"_blank\">Sputnik.md<\/a><\/strong> a publicat \u00een ziua prelungirii arestului 3 \u0219tiri la subiect, \u00een care o bun\u0103 parte a informa\u021biei s-a repetat: \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/moldova\/20170622\/13240297\/zi-decisiva-pentru-dorin-chirtoaca-va-iesi-sau-nu-din-arest.html\" target=\"_blank\">Zi decisiv\u0103 pentru Dorin Chirtoac\u0103: va ie\u0219i sau nu din arest<\/a>\u201d, \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/moldova\/20170622\/13243722\/iata-cum-arata-dorin-chirtoaca-supa-o-luna-de-detentie.html\" target=\"_blank\">Iat\u0103 cum arat\u0103 Dorin Chirtoac\u0103 dup\u0103 o lun\u0103 de deten\u021bie<\/a>\u201d \u0219i \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/moldova\/20170622\/13247463\/sputnik-arest-domiciliu-chirtoaca.html\" target=\"_blank\">Se str\u00e2nge funia la par: \u00eenc\u0103 30 de zile de arest la domiciliu pentru Chirtoac\u0103<\/a>\u201d. \u00cen cele trei \u0219tiri difuzate, Sputnik doar a anun\u021bat c\u0103 Dorin Chirtoac\u0103 va face declara\u021bii dup\u0103 \u0219edin\u021b\u0103, \u00eens\u0103 nu a difuzat declara\u021biile primarului f\u0103cute \u00een ap\u0103rarea sa, ceea ce reprezint\u0103 <strong>o omisiune <\/strong>\u0219i o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a prevederii Codului deontologic referitoare la <strong>dreptul la replic\u0103. <\/strong>Atunci c\u00e2nd acest lucru este posibil, jurnalistul trebuie s\u0103 solicite \u0219i s\u0103 publice opiniile tuturor p\u0103r\u021bilor relevante pentru subiect, \u00een special opinia p\u0103r\u021bii acuzate. \u00cen cazul dat, de\u0219i \u00eenvinuitul \u0219i-a f\u0103cut public\u0103 opinia \u00een fa\u021ba jurnali\u0219tilor, aceasta nu a fost inclus\u0103 \u00een \u0219tiri. De asemenea, \u00een toate cele 3 \u0219tiri s-a repetat acuza\u021bia referitoare la cele 13 procente de venit ilegal. \u0218i aceast\u0103 acuza\u021bie a fost comentat\u0103 de c\u0103tre primar, \u00eens\u0103 comentariul nu s-a reg\u0103sit \u00een \u0219tirile de la Sputnik.<\/p>\n<p>O alt\u0103 gre\u0219eal\u0103 a reporterilor de la Sputnik \u021bine de informa\u021bia despre termenul arestului -mandatul a fost prelungit pentru 25 de zile \u0219i nu pentru 30 de zile, a\u0219a cum scriu reporterii. Mitingul liberalilor \u00een sus\u021binerea celui acuzat nu a fost men\u021bionat deloc \u00een \u0219tirile de la Sputnik, fapt ce poate fi calificat drept o prezentare selectiv\u0103 a faptelor. <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/sputnik-4.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-6924\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-6924\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/sputnik-4-350x186.jpg\" alt=\"sputnik\" width=\"358\" height=\"190\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/sputnik-4-350x186.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/sputnik-4-351x185.jpg 351w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/sputnik-4.jpg 1005w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 358px) 100vw, 358px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Portalul <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.noi.md\/md\/news_id\/229628\" target=\"_blank\">Noi.md<\/a><\/strong> a publicat la 22 iunie 2 \u0219tiri legate de eveniment: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.noi.md\/md\/news_id\/229628\">una <\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.noi.md\/md\/news_id\/229628\">care anun\u021b\u0103<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.noi.md\/md\/news_id\/229628\"> prelungirea arestului<\/a>, din care a fost <strong>omis\u0103<\/strong> declara\u021bia\/pozi\u021bia celui acuzat, iar a doua cu explica\u021bia lui Dorin Chirtoac\u0103 pentru ie\u0219irile sale din cas\u0103 pe durata arestului la domiciliu. Faptul c\u0103 jurnali\u0219tii au evitat s\u0103 transmit\u0103 pozi\u021bia \u00eenvinuitului, care a spus c\u0103 se consider\u0103 nevinovat \u0219i c\u0103 nu a f\u0103cut trafic de influen\u021b\u0103, denot\u0103 <strong>caracterul p\u0103rtinitor al \u0219tirii \u0219i \u00eenc\u0103lcarea normelor deontologice referitoare la echilibru, informare din mai multe surse \u0219i dreptul la replic\u0103<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen concluzie, unele institu\u021bii media monitorizate au ignorat inten\u021bionat declara\u021biile primarului privind \u00eenvinuirea care i-a fost adus\u0103 \u0219i nu le-au inclus \u00een \u0219tiri, av\u00e2nd scopul de a scoate \u00een eviden\u021b\u0103 pozi\u021bia procurorilor. Astfel, s-a ob\u021binut o imagine unilateral\u0103 asupra subiectului.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em><strong>Viorica Zaharia, expert\u0103 media<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>________________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Articolul a fost realizat de Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent \u00een cadrul <\/em><strong><em>Campaniei media \u00eempotriva informa\u021biei false \u0219i tenden\u021bioase<\/em><\/strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/api.md\/category\/stop-fals\" target=\"_blank\"><em>STOP FALS<\/em><\/a><em>!, desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 de Asocia\u021bia Presei Independente (API), Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) \u0219i Asocia\u021bia VIP a Telejurnali\u0219tilor Independen\u021bi din Moldova (ATVJI).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Context: La 22 iunie 2017 Judec\u0103toria Chi\u0219in\u0103u a prelungit cu 25 de zile mandatul de arest la domiciliu al primarului municipiului Chi\u0219in\u0103u, Dorin Chirtoac\u0103, cercetat pentru trafic de influen\u021b\u0103 \u00eentr-un dosar penal privind amenajarea unor parc\u0103ri cu plat\u0103 \u00een Capital\u0103. Evenimentul este relevant pentru opinia public\u0103, pentru c\u0103 vizeaz\u0103 o cauz\u0103 de corup\u021bie, dar \u0219i<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":6925,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Prezentare unilateral\u0103, neasigurarea dreptului la replic\u0103 \u0219i informa\u021bii inexacte \u00een \u0219tirile despre prelungirea arestului lui Dorin Chirtoac\u0103 - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Context: La 22 iunie 2017 Judec\u0103toria Chi\u0219in\u0103u a prelungit cu 25 de zile mandatul de arest la domiciliu al primarului municipiului Chi\u0219in\u0103u, Dorin Chirtoac\u0103, cercetat pentru trafic de influen\u021b\u0103 \u00eentr-un dosar penal privind amenajarea unor parc\u0103ri cu plat\u0103 \u00een Capital\u0103. Evenimentul este relevant pentru opinia public\u0103, pentru c\u0103 vizeaz\u0103 o cauz\u0103 de corup\u021bie, dar \u0219iMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-18T06:38:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-25T06:51:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/noi.md_-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"610\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"399\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/noi.md_-3.jpg\",\"width\":610,\"height\":399},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Prezentare unilateral\\u0103, neasigurarea dreptului la replic\\u0103 \\u0219i informa\\u021bii inexacte \\u00een \\u0219tirile despre prelungirea arestului lui Dorin Chirtoac\\u0103 - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-18T06:38:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-25T06:51:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-prezentare-unilaterala-neasigurarea-dreptului-la-replica-si-informatii-inexacte-stirile-despre-prelungirea-arestului-lui-dorin-chirtoaca\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6921"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6921"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6921\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6995,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6921\/revisions\/6995"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}