{"id":6718,"date":"2017-06-22T09:25:40","date_gmt":"2017-06-22T09:25:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=6718"},"modified":"2017-06-29T08:20:41","modified_gmt":"2017-06-29T08:20:41","slug":"raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/","title":{"rendered":"Raport CJI: Mai multe institu\u021bii media din R. Moldova prezint\u0103 faptele selectiv, recurg la manipulare \u0219i folosesc un limbaj discriminator"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>Patru din cele 11 institu\u021bii media monitorizate \u00een lunile aprilie \u0219i mai 2017 au dat dovad\u0103 de p\u0103rtinire la scrierea \u0219tirilor, exprim\u00e2ndu-\u0219i \u00een text sprijinul fa\u021b\u0103 de un anumit partid, au exagerat faptele \u0219i au distorsionat mesajul surselor prin trunchierea declara\u021biilor. Acestea sunt c\u00e2teva dintre concluziile celui de-al \u0219aselea raport de monitorizare <\/em><\/strong><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Raport-de-monitorizare-Nr.6.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">\u201e<\/a><em><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Raport_de_monitorizare_Nr._6_RO.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Elemente de propagand\u0103, manipulare informa\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i \u00eenc\u0103lcare a normelor deontologiei jurnalistice \u00een spa\u021biul mediatic autohton\u201d (1 aprilie 2017 \u2013 1 iunie 2017)<\/a>,<\/em> <em>lansat de Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) joi, 22 iunie 2017.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Printre subiectele monitorizate de experta media Viorica Zaharia se num\u0103r\u0103 condamnarea lui Veaceslav Platon la 18 ani de \u00eenchisoare, p\u0103r\u0103sirea majorit\u0103\u021bii parlamentare de c\u0103tre deputatul liberal Lilian Carp, adoptarea \u00een prima lectur\u0103 a proiectelor de modificare a sistemului electoral, precum \u0219i Mar\u0219ul solidarit\u0103\u021bii \u201eF\u0103r\u0103 fric\u0103!\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Potrivit Vioric\u0103i Zaharia, <strong>\u201e<\/strong>posturile Publika TV \u0219i Prime au favorizat \u00een \u0219tirile lor Partidul Democrat, recurg\u00e2nd la diverse tehnici de manipulare, precum prezentarea selectiv\u0103 a faptelor, distorsionarea mesajului surselor, ajung\u00e2ndu-se p\u00e2n\u0103 la falsificarea declara\u021biilor acestora<strong>,<\/strong> \u0219i etichetarea<strong>. <\/strong>Postul Accent TV a f\u0103cut partizanat \u00een favoarea Partidului Sociali\u0219tilor, fapt constatat \u00een special \u00een \u0219tirea referitoare la adoptarea proiectului de lege privind introducerea sistemului de vot mixt. De asemenea, a folosit exagerarea faptelor \u0219i distorsionarea mesajului surselor prin trunchierea declara\u021biilor. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, Sputnik.md a folosit un limbaj discriminator \u0219i la adresa minorit\u0103\u021bilor sexuale, impun\u00e2nd, \u00een \u0219tiri, o atitudine de condamnare a acestui grup social<strong>\u201d<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>CJI le recomand\u0103 institu\u021biilor media \u0219i jurnali\u0219tilor s\u0103 renun\u021be la practica select\u0103rii faptelor reflectate \u00een \u0219tiri \u00een func\u021bie de interesele proprietarilor \u0219i \u00eei \u00eendeamn\u0103 s\u0103 informeze publicul echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a proteja sau a promova imaginea unui partid ori lider politic. Membrilor Consiliului Coordonator al Audiovizualului li se recomand\u0103 s\u0103 urm\u0103reasc\u0103 programele de \u0219tiri TV produse \u00een R. Moldova \u0219i s\u0103 se autosesizeze pentru a penaliza falsurile \u0219i alte ac\u021biuni manipulatoare ale jurnali\u0219tilor, care constituie \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri ale Codului Audiovizualului. Pentru Consiliul pentru Prevenirea \u0219i Combaterea Discrimin\u0103rii \u0219i Asigurarea Egalit\u0103\u021bii recomandarea e s\u0103 monitorizeze modul \u00een care presa reflect\u0103 evenimentele referitoare la grupurile sociale vulnerabile la discriminare, pentru a sanc\u021biona derapajele de la normele referitoare la interzicerea propag\u0103rii stereotipurilor \u0219i a limbajului discriminator.<\/p>\n<p>CJI va continua monitorizarea mass-mediei, iar consumatorii de presa\u0306 sunt \u00eendemna\u021bi s\u0103 se informeze din mai multe surse, pentru a evita riscul de a primi o informa\u021bie eronata\u0306 s\u0326i manipulatoare.<\/p>\n<p>________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Acest raport a fost realizat de Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent \u00een cadrul Campaniei media \u00eempotriva informa\u021biei false \u0219i tenden\u021bioase <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/api.md\/category\/stop-fals\"><em>STOP FALS<\/em><\/a><em>!, desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 de Asocia\u021bia Presei Independente (API), Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) \u0219i Asocia\u021bia VIP a Telejurnali\u0219tilor Independen\u021bi din Moldova (ATVJI).<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patru din cele 11 institu\u021bii media monitorizate \u00een lunile aprilie \u0219i mai 2017 au dat dovad\u0103 de p\u0103rtinire la scrierea \u0219tirilor, exprim\u00e2ndu-\u0219i \u00een text sprijinul fa\u021b\u0103 de un anumit partid, au exagerat faptele \u0219i au distorsionat mesajul surselor prin trunchierea declara\u021biilor. Acestea sunt c\u00e2teva dintre concluziile celui de-al \u0219aselea raport de monitorizare \u201eElemente de propagand\u0103,<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":6719,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raport CJI: Mai multe institu\u021bii media din R. Moldova prezint\u0103 faptele selectiv, recurg la manipulare \u0219i folosesc un limbaj discriminator - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patru din cele 11 institu\u021bii media monitorizate \u00een lunile aprilie \u0219i mai 2017 au dat dovad\u0103 de p\u0103rtinire la scrierea \u0219tirilor, exprim\u00e2ndu-\u0219i \u00een text sprijinul fa\u021b\u0103 de un anumit partid, au exagerat faptele \u0219i au distorsionat mesajul surselor prin trunchierea declara\u021biilor. Acestea sunt c\u00e2teva dintre concluziile celui de-al \u0219aselea raport de monitorizare \u201eElemente de propagand\u0103,Mai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-06-22T09:25:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-29T08:20:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/738566336EF4C599DD7653093E73B7B9E83395EC2268A2DA00pimgpsh_fullsize_distr-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"433\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/^738566336EF4C599DD7653093E73B7B9E83395EC2268A2DA00^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr-1.jpg\",\"width\":650,\"height\":433},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/\",\"name\":\"Raport CJI: Mai multe institu\\u021bii media din R. Moldova prezint\\u0103 faptele selectiv, recurg la manipulare \\u0219i folosesc un limbaj discriminator - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-22T09:25:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-29T08:20:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/raport-cji-mai-multe-institutii-media-din-r-moldova-prezinta-faptele-selectiv-recurg-la-manipulare-si-folosesc-un-limbaj-discriminator\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6718"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6718"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6718\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6757,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6718\/revisions\/6757"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}