{"id":5076,"date":"2016-11-21T07:42:02","date_gmt":"2016-11-21T07:42:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=5076"},"modified":"2016-11-28T13:41:29","modified_gmt":"2016-11-28T13:41:29","slug":"studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Opinii \u00een loc de fapte, folosirea nejustificat\u0103 a surselor anonime"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>(<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/moldova24.info\/\"><em>Moldova24.info<strong>,<\/strong> <\/em><\/a><em>9 noiembrie 2016)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Gen: \u0218tire<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Titlu: \u201e<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/moldova24.info\/2016\/11\/depresie-dupa-baia-de-multime-de-la-balti-si-baia-de-huiduieli-maia-sandu-si-a-anulat-pentru-azi-intalnirile-in-teritoriu\/\" target=\"_blank\">Depresie? Dup\u0103 baia de mul\u021bime de la B\u0103l\u021bi \u0219i baia de huiduieli, Maia Sandu \u0219i-a anulat pentru azi \u00eent\u00e2lnirile \u00een teritoriu<\/a><strong>\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00cen textul \u0219tirii se anun\u021b\u0103, cu trimitere la surse \u201edemne de \u00eencredere\u201d din Partidul Demnitate \u0219i Adev\u0103r, c\u0103 Maia Sandu \u0219i-a anulat o serie de \u00eent\u00e2lniri electorale, \u00een urma \u201ehuiduielilor de la B\u0103l\u021bi\u201d. Afirma\u021bia nu este confirmat\u0103 de nici o surs\u0103 oficial\u0103 din cadrul partidului, iar reporterii nici nu au c\u0103utat s\u0103 o confirme. Aceast\u0103 informa\u021bie neconfirmat\u0103 a servit \u00eens\u0103 suport pentru exprimarea opiniilor autorului, care s-a dat cu p\u0103rerea despre o posibil\u0103 depresie a candidatei: \u201ecare, se pare, a intrat \u00een depresie\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Reporterul mai anun\u021b\u0103, tot cu referire la \u201esursele noastre\u201d, c\u0103 \u00een localit\u0103\u021bi, la \u00eent\u00e2lnirile electorale, merge doar Andrei N\u0103stase, dup\u0103 ce Maia Sandu ar fi renun\u021bat. La final, autorul \u00ee\u0219i afi\u0219eaz\u0103 propriile concluzii, unde d\u0103 aprecieri presta\u021biei candidatei la ultima dezbatere electoral\u0103 \u0219i conchide c\u0103 Maia Sandu a cedat nervos: \u201e<em>De fapt, starea ei de nervozitate s-a accentuat<\/em> <em>dup\u0103<\/em> <em>prima<\/em> <em>dezbatere electoral\u0103, de acum o s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103, cu Igor Dodon, la care a avut o presta\u021bie slab\u0103. Apoi a urmat incidentul legat de finan\u021barea netransparent\u0103 a campaniei electorale. Astfel c\u0103 Maia Sandu, nefiind deprins\u0103 cu astfel de provoc\u0103ri politice \u0219i cu ie\u0219iri prea dese \u00een afara Chi\u0219in\u0103ului, a cedat nervos<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Codul Deontologic al Jurnalistului \u0219i manualele de specialitate recomand\u0103 evitarea folosirii surselor anonime, ascunderea identit\u0103\u021bii surselor fiind indicat\u0103 doar \u00een cazurile \u00een care divulgarea numelui implic\u0103 pericol pentru securitatea sursei: \u201e<em>Jurnalistul indic\u0103, de regul\u0103, sursa informa\u0163iilor sale<\/em> <em>\u015fi<\/em> <em>\u00eentreprinde demersuri pentru a ob\u0163ine informa\u0163ii din surse citabile<\/em>\u201d (<a href=\"http:\/\/consiliuldepresa.md\/fileadmin\/fisiere\/documente\/cod_d_rom.pdf\">Art. 2.6, Codul Deontologic al<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/consiliuldepresa.md\/fileadmin\/fisiere\/documente\/cod_d_rom.pdf\">Jurnalistului din Republia Moldova<\/a>). \u00cen acest caz recurgerea la surse anonime nu a fost justificat\u0103, iar faptul c\u0103 informa\u021bia nu a fost verificat\u0103 din surse oficiale denot\u0103 inten\u021bia jurnalistului de a scoate \u00een eviden\u021b\u0103 o idee\/informa\u021bie manipulatoare: aceea c\u0103 liderul PAS se afl\u0103 \u00een depresie, ceea ce transmite publicului\/votan\u021bilor un semnal c\u0103 au \u00een fa\u021b\u0103 un candidat slab \u0219i emotiv.<\/p>\n<p>De asemenea, regulile jurnalismului de calitate presupun separarea faptelor de opinii. \u00cen acest caz, chiar dac\u0103 textul ar fi fost unul informativ-analitic, autorul ar fi trebuit s\u0103-\u0219i expun\u0103 opiniile pe o baz\u0103 de argumente \u0219i fapte, a\u0219a cum prevede Codul Deontologic: \u201e<em>Jurnalistul<\/em> <em>\u00ee\u015fi exprim\u0103<\/em> <em>opiniile<\/em> <em>pe o baz\u0103 factual\u0103, pornind de la informa\u0163ii pe care, de bun\u0103 credin\u0163\u0103, le consider\u0103 adev\u0103rate<\/em>\u201d(Art. 2.8., Codul Deontologic).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>Viorica Zaharia, expert\u0103 media <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>__________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Studiul de caz a fost realizat \u00een cadrul proiectului \u201dMonitorizarea mass-media \u00een campania electoral\u0103 2016\u201d. Proiectul este implementat de Asocia\u021bia Presei Independente (API) \u0219i Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) cu sprijinul financiar al National Endowment for Democracy (SUA) \u015fi al Consiliul Europei. Opiniile exprimate apar\u0163in autorilor \u015fi nu reflect\u0103 neap\u0103rat punctul de vedere al finan\u0163atorilor.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Moldova24.info, 9 noiembrie 2016) Gen: \u0218tire Titlu: \u201eDepresie? Dup\u0103 baia de mul\u021bime de la B\u0103l\u021bi \u0219i baia de huiduieli, Maia Sandu \u0219i-a anulat pentru azi \u00eent\u00e2lnirile \u00een teritoriu\u201d \u00cen textul \u0219tirii se anun\u021b\u0103, cu trimitere la surse \u201edemne de \u00eencredere\u201d din Partidul Demnitate \u0219i Adev\u0103r, c\u0103 Maia Sandu \u0219i-a anulat o serie de \u00eent\u00e2lniri electorale,<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":5077,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Opinii \u00een loc de fapte, folosirea nejustificat\u0103 a surselor anonime - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"(Moldova24.info, 9 noiembrie 2016) Gen: \u0218tire Titlu: \u201eDepresie? Dup\u0103 baia de mul\u021bime de la B\u0103l\u021bi \u0219i baia de huiduieli, Maia Sandu \u0219i-a anulat pentru azi \u00eent\u00e2lnirile \u00een teritoriu\u201d \u00cen textul \u0219tirii se anun\u021b\u0103, cu trimitere la surse \u201edemne de \u00eencredere\u201d din Partidul Demnitate \u0219i Adev\u0103r, c\u0103 Maia Sandu \u0219i-a anulat o serie de \u00eent\u00e2lniri electorale,Mai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-21T07:42:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-28T13:41:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/foto-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"431\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"409\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/foto-2.png\",\"width\":431,\"height\":409},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Opinii \\u00een loc de fapte, folosirea nejustificat\\u0103 a surselor anonime - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-21T07:42:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T13:41:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-opinii-loc-de-fapte-folosirea-nejustificata-surselor-anonime\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5076"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5076"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5076\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5134,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5076\/revisions\/5134"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5077"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}