{"id":17508,"date":"2022-03-10T12:59:14","date_gmt":"2022-03-10T12:59:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=17508"},"modified":"2022-04-05T12:38:43","modified_gmt":"2022-04-05T12:38:43","slug":"media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Media Radar: CJI a evaluat credibilitatea a 41 de institu\u021bii media"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) a monitorizat con\u021binutul publicat de 41 de institu\u021bii media \u00een perioada 22 &#8211; 25 februarie, dou\u0103 zile p\u00e2n\u0103 \u0219i dou\u0103 zile dup\u0103 invazia trupelor ruse \u00een Ucraina. Astfel, CJI a stabilit gradul de credibilitate a acestor portaluri \u0219i a \u00eentocmit ratingul lor pe platforma <a href=\"https:\/\/radar.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\">Media Radar<\/a>. Rezultatele au fost anun\u021bate \u00een patru etape, pe 2, 4, 7 \u0219i 9 martie.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cele 41 de portaluri monitorizate de exper\u021bii-evaluatori ai sunt: Actualitati.md, Cotidianul.md, Esp.md, Newsmaker.md, Omg.md, Tuk.md, Gazetadechisinau.md, Moldova24.info, Nokta.md, Zdg.md, Timpul.md, Moldova.org, Tv8.md, Ziarulnational.md, Gagauzinfo.md, Ntv.md, Telegraph.md, Ipn.md, Infotag.md, Grt.md, Mold-street.com, Observatorul.md, Diez.md, Rtr.md, Tribuna.md, Aif.md, Nordnews.md, Primelestiri.md, Trm.md, Agora.md, Unimedia.info, Deschide.md, Noi.md, Protv.md, A-tv.md, Jurnal.md, Realitatea.md, Kp.md, Publika.md, Expresul.md \u0219i Replicamedia.md.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Portalurile au fost evaluate \u00een baza mai multor criterii, descrise \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/radar.mediacritica.md\/ro\/metodologia\/\">metodologia de monitorizare<\/a>: disponibilitatea datelor de identificare; declara\u021bia privind politic\u0103 editorial\u0103; norme profesionale asumate public, cum ar fi Codul deontologic al jurnalistului din R. Moldova; calitatea produselor mediatice; accesibilitatea pentru a naviga pe site.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Punctajul maxim pe care \u00eel poate acumula un portal constituie 56 de puncte, iar indicele de credibilitate al portalurilor informa\u021bionale a fost dedus prin sumarea punctelor atribuite fiec\u0103rui criteriu. Astfel, institu\u021biile media care au acumulat \u00eentre 46 \u0219i 56 de puncte au fost declarate surse media de \u00eencredere pentru utilizatori. Cele care au ob\u021binut \u00eentre 36 \u0219i 45,9 puncte, \u00eentrunesc o mare parte din criteriile de credibilitate. Dac\u0103 portalul a ob\u021binut \u00eentre 26 \u0219i 35,9 puncte, acesta \u00eentrune\u0219te o parte din criteriile de credibilitate, iar utilizatorii lui trebuie s\u0103 dea dovad\u0103 de precau\u021bie. Iar dac\u0103 a acumulat \u00eentre 16 \u0219i 25,9 puncte, site-ul \u00eentrune\u0219te prea pu\u021bine din criteriile de credibilitate. \u00cen sf\u00e2r\u0219it, dac\u0103 institu\u021bia media a ob\u021binut mai pu\u021bin de 16 puncte, utilizatorii nu pot avea \u00eencredere \u00een aceasta.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Datele sunt disponibile at\u00e2t pe aplica\u021bia Media Radar, c\u00e2t \u0219i pe\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/radar.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\">platforma Media Radar<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen urm\u0103toarele luni, Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent va realiza o nou\u0103 rund\u0103 de monitorizare a portalurilor media. Prin intermediul platformei Media Radar, CJI \u00ee\u0219i propune s\u0103 ajute consumatorii de media s\u0103 navigheze mai u\u0219or prin informa\u021bia oferit\u0103 zilnic de numeroasele resurse media online.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Procesul de monitorizare a avut loc \u00een cadrul proiectului \u201ePresa \u00een sprijinul democra\u021biei, incluziunii \u0219i responsabilit\u0103\u021bii \u00een Moldova\u201d (MEDIA-M), implementat de Internews \u00een Moldova cu suportul USAID \u0219i UK.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) a monitorizat con\u021binutul publicat de 41 de institu\u021bii media \u00een perioada 22 &#8211; 25 februarie, dou\u0103 zile p\u00e2n\u0103 \u0219i dou\u0103 zile dup\u0103 invazia trupelor ruse \u00een Ucraina. Astfel, CJI a stabilit gradul de credibilitate a acestor portaluri \u0219i a \u00eentocmit ratingul lor pe platforma Media Radar. Rezultatele au fost anun\u021bate<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":17443,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Media Radar: CJI a evaluat credibilitatea a 41 de institu\u021bii media - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) a monitorizat con\u021binutul publicat de 41 de institu\u021bii media \u00een perioada 22 &#8211; 25 februarie, dou\u0103 zile p\u00e2n\u0103 \u0219i dou\u0103 zile dup\u0103 invazia trupelor ruse \u00een Ucraina. Astfel, CJI a stabilit gradul de credibilitate a acestor portaluri \u0219i a \u00eentocmit ratingul lor pe platforma Media Radar. Rezultatele au fost anun\u021bateMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-10T12:59:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-05T12:38:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Logo_MediaRadar-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"554\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"217\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Logo_MediaRadar-2.jpg\",\"width\":554,\"height\":217},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/\",\"name\":\"Media Radar: CJI a evaluat credibilitatea a 41 de institu\\u021bii media - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-10T12:59:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-05T12:38:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/4c90082fb1b49e6f42ffd4f751d8675a\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/media-radar-cji-a-evaluat-credibilitatea-a-41-de-institutii-media\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/4c90082fb1b49e6f42ffd4f751d8675a\",\"name\":\"Tataru Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17508"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17508"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17741,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17508\/revisions\/17741"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17443"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}