{"id":16018,"date":"2021-04-20T10:24:44","date_gmt":"2021-04-20T10:24:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=16018"},"modified":"2021-04-23T11:45:51","modified_gmt":"2021-04-23T11:45:51","slug":"studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale privind dizolvarea Parlamentului, \u00eentre prezentarea selectiv\u0103 a declara\u021biilor \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Subiectul privind decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Republicii Moldova (CC) pe marginea dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului a fost reflectat de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media. Unele (Sputnik.md, Unimedia.info, Jurnal TV) l-au abordat amplu \u0219i detaliat \u00een materialele difuzate sau publicate, iar altele l-au tratat superficial (NTV Moldova, Kp.md). Cu excep\u021bia Prime TV, Publika TV \u0219i Unimedia.info, celelalte redac\u021bii au comis abateri deontologice \u0219i\/sau au recurs la tehnici de manipulare. Unele institu\u021bii media au \u201euitat\u201d s\u0103 includ\u0103 opiniile anumitor partide politice pe marginea deciziei, iar estomparea unei informa\u021bii, dar mai ales a declara\u021biilor unor entit\u0103\u021bi, este una din tehnicile de manipulare cele mai folosite \u00een acest caz. Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile, lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103 \u0219i prezentarea selectiv\u0103 a declara\u021biilor\/informa\u021biei r\u0103m\u00e2n a fi cele mai des \u00eent\u00e2lnite abateri deontologice. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em> <img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-15929 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help-350x293.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"549\" height=\"460\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help-350x293.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help-150x126.png 150w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help.png 940w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 549px) 100vw, 549px\" \/><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dn33-qDsok8&amp;t=1s\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 15 aprilie 2021<\/a>, <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a difuzat 3 \u0219tiri referitoare la decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, \u00een debutul edi\u021biei. \u00cen prima, postul de televiziune a relatat despre dezbaterile din cadrul \u0219edin\u021bei CC, alt\u0103 \u0219tire a fost f\u0103cut\u0103 exclusiv \u00een baza declara\u021biei lui Igor Dodon, liderul Partidului Sociali\u0219tilor, care a men\u021bionat c\u0103 <em>\u201etrei din cinci judec\u0103tori ai CC au uzurpat puterea \u00een stat \u00een interesul pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu\u201d<\/em>, iar a treia \u0219tire a inclus opiniile unor exper\u021bi pe marginea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii magistra\u021bilor constitu\u021bionali. <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103. Redac\u021bia a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a declara\u021biilor\/estompare.<\/strong> Juri\u0219tii Parlamentului au fost cita\u021bi direct de trei ori, cu un timp total de emisie de un minut,, \u00een timp ce Maia Sandu a a fost citat\u0103 direct o singur\u0103 dat\u0103, cu o declara\u021bie de aproape 20 de secunde. Mai mult dec\u00e2t at\u00e2t, <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a inclus o secven\u021b\u0103 irelevant\u0103 din declara\u021bia pre\u0219edintei Sandu \u0219i anume cea \u00een care \u0219efa statului solicit\u0103 \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi dizolvarea Parlamentului. Pe de alt\u0103 parte, \u00een cazul juri\u0219tilor Parlamentului, redac\u021bia a selectat \u0219i inclus declara\u021biile \u00een care ace\u0219tia explic\u0103 de ce decizia de dizolvare a Parlamentului nu ar fi una corect\u0103;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Trunchierea unor informa\u021bii:<\/strong> <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a men\u021bionat \u00een una din \u0219tiri c\u0103 <em>\u201e&#8230;\u00cenalta Curte nu a luat \u00een considerare nici recomand\u0103rile Consiliului Europei, care sus\u021bine c\u0103 dizolvarea Legislativului trebuie s\u0103 fie o decizie de ultim\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103\u201d<\/em>. De fapt, \u00een r\u0103spunsul secretarului general al Consiliului Europei, Marija Pej\u010dinovi\u0107 Buri\u0107, nu se men\u021bioneaz\u0103 despre faptul c\u0103 \u201e<em>dizolvarea Legislativului trebuie s\u0103 fie o decizie de ultim\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103<\/em>\u201d, ci c\u0103 <em>\u201edizolvarea unui parlament ales prin alegeri libere \u0219i echitabile pentru exprimarea voin\u021bei poporului este o m\u0103sur\u0103 de ultim recurs, care nu poate fi luat\u0103 \u00een mod facil, ci doar respect\u00e2nd spiritul \u0219i litera Constitu\u021biei\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Igor Dodon i-a acuzat pe judec\u0103torii CC Domnica Manole, Liuba \u0218ova, Nicolae Ro\u0219ca de <em>\u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d<\/em>, iar pe Maia Sandu c\u0103 <em>\u201ea preluat metodele oligarhului Vladimir Plahotniuc\u201d<\/em>. Niciunuia dintre cei viza\u021bi <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> nu i-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103. Sintagma men\u021bionat\u0103 de jurnali\u0219ti, potrivit c\u0103reia <em>\u201ePre\u0219edin\u021bia nu a r\u0103spuns acuza\u021biilor\u201d<\/em>, nu poate fi calificat\u0103 drept asigurarea dreptului la replic\u0103;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em>\u201eDecizia CC, care a dat und\u0103 verde dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului, st\u00e2rne\u0219te suspiciuni \u0219i \u00een r\u00e2ndul exper\u021bilor \u00een drept constitu\u021bional\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e&#8230; \u00eentr-o alt\u0103 ordine de idei, exper\u021bii constitu\u021bionali declar\u0103 c\u0103 \u0219edin\u021ba de ast\u0103zi nu a avut nicio logic\u0103\u201d<\/em>.<br \/>\n<iframe title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/dn33-qDsok8\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a tratat subiectul monitorizat superficial \u2013 prezent\u00e2nd informa\u021bia selectiv (<strong>estompare<\/strong>) \u2013, tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103. Canalul a difuzat o \u0219tire despre decizia Cur\u021bii, cu care a deschis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=gx3ZW5uZbgs\">buletinul informativ<\/a>, redactat\u0103 \u00een baza unei declara\u021bii a pre\u0219edintei institu\u021biei, Domnica Manole, care a citit textul deciziei, \u0219i reac\u021biei liderului PSRM, Igor Dodon, \u00een care acesta a \u00eenvinuit-o pe Maia Sandu de <em>\u201elovitur\u0103 de stat\u201d<\/em> \u0219i <em>\u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d<\/em>. <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Selec\u021bia p\u0103rtinitoare a declara\u021biilor.<\/strong> <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a inclus \u00een \u0219tire doar reac\u021bia lui Igor Dodon pe marginea deciziei CC, ignor\u00e2ndu-le pe cele ale Pre\u0219edin\u021biei, politicienilor \u0219i partidelor politice parlamentare (<strong>estomparea<\/strong>);<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Igor Dodon a acuzat-o pe Maia Sandu de <em>\u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d<\/em>. <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> nu i-a asigurat \u00eens\u0103 \u0219efei statului dreptul la replic\u0103.<\/li>\n<li><iframe title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/gx3ZW5uZbgs\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/sinteza-zilei-18-30-lansarea-oficiala-15-04-2021\/\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 15 aprilie<\/a>, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a difuzat 4 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat, de asemenea la \u00eenceputul edi\u021biei. \u00cen prima, postul de televiziune a prezentat pe scurt decizia Cur\u021bii, prin declara\u021bia Domnic\u0103i Manole. Jurnali\u0219tii au men\u021bionat c\u0103 judec\u0103torul Vladimir \u021aurcan a avut o <em>\u201eopinie separat\u0103\u201d<\/em>, iar judec\u0103torul Serghei \u021aurcan o <em>\u201eopinie disident\u0103\u201d<\/em>. \u00cen a doua \u0219tire, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a prezentat exclusiv reac\u021bia lui Igor Dodon pe marginea deciziei CC. \u00cen a treia, redac\u021bia a inclus opiniile unor anali\u0219ti politici \u0219i ale unor frac\u021biuni parlamentare \u2013 cu excep\u021bia Partidului Ac\u021biune \u0219i Solidaritate (<strong>estompare<\/strong>) \u2013 despre decizia CC. \u00cen ultima \u0219tire, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a abordat manifesta\u021bia organizat\u0103 de un grup de cet\u0103\u021beni \u00een fa\u021ba cl\u0103dirii CC. Canalul a reflectat subiectul \u00eentr-o cheie similar\u0103 postului Primul \u00een Moldova, folosind acela\u0219i scenariu, text, imagini \u0219i surse. Redac\u021bia a prezentat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, i-a favorizat pe Igor Dodon \u0219i PSRM, plas\u00e2ndu-i \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103, \u00een timp ce pre\u0219edinta Maia Sandu \u0219i PAS au fost pu\u0219i \u00een lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103. <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Pre\u0219edinta Maia Sandu a fost acuzat\u0103 de Igor Dodon de <em>\u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d<\/em>. \u0218efei statului nu i-a fost asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em>\u201eDecizia CC a st\u00e2rnit un val de reac\u021bii \u0219i \u00een spa\u021biul public de la Chi\u0219in\u0103u. Mai multe voci declar\u0103 \u00een unison c\u0103 Republica Moldova urmeaz\u0103 s\u0103 parcurg\u0103 o cale destul de dificil\u0103 \u0219i s\u0103 \u021bin\u0103 piept unei crize f\u0103r\u0103 precedent\u201d; \u201eOamenii buni ai Maiei Sandu \u0219i-au dat arama pe fa\u021b\u0103. (&#8230;) \u00cenarma\u021bi cu drapelul UE, manifestan\u021bii au c\u00e2ntat osanale lui Sandu, dup\u0103 care \u0219i-au reorientat aten\u021bia spre deputatul PSRM Vasile Bolea&#8230;\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em>\u201eParlamentarii sus\u021bin c\u0103 Maia Sandu \u0219i-a t\u0103iat nu numai ei craca de sub picioare, ci tuturor oamenilor care a\u0219teptau solu\u021bii pentru problemele lor \u00een plin\u0103 criz\u0103 economic\u0103, pandemic\u0103 \u0219i social\u0103\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Prezentarea p\u0103rtinitoare a declara\u021biilor. Accent TV<\/strong> a men\u021bionat c\u0103 toate partidele parlamentare au venit cu reac\u021bii la decizia CC, dar a citat sau men\u021bionat doar opiniile PPDA, PSRM, Pro Moldova, Platforma Pentru Moldova, \u201euit\u00e2nd\u201d de cele ale Partidului Democrat \u0219i PAS;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tehnica du\u0219manului intern.<\/strong> Maia Sandu \u0219i Pre\u0219edin\u021bia au fost prezentate de c\u0103tre <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> drept entit\u0103\u021bile care creeaz\u0103 haos \u00een \u021bar\u0103;<\/li>\n<li>Postul a sugerat c\u0103, pe de o parte, PAS se pozi\u021bioneaz\u0103 drept partidul \u201eoamenilor buni\u201d (inclusiv se face transfer de imagine dinspre PAS c\u0103tre Maia Sandu, fosta lider\u0103 a acestui partid), iar pe de alt\u0103 parte, organizeaz\u0103 proteste: \u201e<em>Se pare c\u0103 oamenii buni nu s-au dovedit a fi at\u00e2t de buni. La apari\u021bia deputatului PSRM Vasile Bolea, protestele pa\u0219nice au degenerat \u00een huiduieli \u0219i \u00eenjur\u0103turi<\/em>\u201d;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ironie<\/strong>: <em>\u201eEchipa oamenilor buni\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201eManifestan\u021bii au salutat-o z\u00e2mbind \u0219i <\/em><em>s-au aciuat \u00een jurul ei<\/em><em> (n.a. Maiei Sandu), ignor\u00e2nd vizibil restric\u021biile cu privire la distan\u021ba social\u0103 de cel pu\u021bin un metru\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a deschis <a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-15-aprilie-2021\">\u201eMesager\u201d-ul din 15 aprilie<\/a> cu \u0219tirea despre decizia CC privind dizolvarea Legislativului. Ulterior, televiziunea public\u0103 a difuzat alte dou\u0103 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat. \u00cen una din ele, redac\u021bia a men\u021bionat despre briefingul la care Maia Sandu a anun\u021bat c\u0103 va semna \u00een scurt timp un decret de dizolvare a Parlamentului, iar \u00een alta, postul public de televiziune a prezentat opiniile unor exper\u021bi \u00een drept constitu\u021bional pe marginea deciziei CC. <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a<\/strong> <strong>opiniilor<\/strong>. \u00cen una din \u0219tiri, <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a prezentat doar opinii critice ale exper\u021bilor cu privire la decizia pre\u0219edintei Sandu \u0219i cea a CC;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePre\u0219edintele Maia Sandu nu poate dizolva Parlamentul \u00eentruc\u00e2t \u00een \u021bar\u0103 este instituit\u0103 stare de urgen\u021b\u0103. De aceast\u0103 p\u0103rere sunt exper\u021bii constitu\u021bionali. Mai mult, ei spun c\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea CC nu \u00eenseamn\u0103 \u0219i obligativitatea organiz\u0103rii alegerilor parlamentare anticipate\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rtr.md\/vesti-moldova\/102221602\/\">\u00cen buletinul informativ <\/a>al <strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a fost difuzat\u0103 o \u0219tire la subiectul monitorizat, fiind reflectate deopotriv\u0103 evenimentele din \u0219edin\u021ba CC \u0219i cele care au avut loc \u00een fa\u021ba institu\u021biei. Redac\u021bia a prezentat neutru informa\u021bia, dar pe finalul materialului a inclus doar reac\u021bia liderului PSRM, Igor Dodon, pe marginea deciziei, f\u0103r\u0103 a echilibra \u0219tirea \u0219i cu opiniile reprezentan\u021bilor altor frac\u021biunilor parlamentare (<strong>selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a declara\u021biilor\/estompare<\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dWJsc20xVNc\">TV6<\/a> a difuzat 3 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat. Redac\u021bia a vorbit \u00een ele despre \u0219edin\u021ba CC \u0219i pronun\u021barea deciziei de dizolvare a Parlamentului, inclusiv manifesta\u021bia organizat\u0103 de un grup de cet\u0103\u021beni \u00een fa\u021ba institu\u021biei, precum \u0219i opiniile reprezentan\u021bilor partidelor parlamentare pe marginea deciziei magistra\u021bilor constitu\u021bionali. <strong>TV6<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase<\/strong>: <em>\u201eAlegeri pe timp de lupt\u0103 cu virusul\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul dintre fapte \u0219i opinii<\/strong>: <em>\u201e&#8230;Deputa\u021bii au venit cu un \u0219ir de reac\u021bii. Majoritatea frac\u021biunilor parlamentare au criticat hot\u0103r\u00e2rea \u0219i au venit cu acuza\u021bii la adresa pre\u0219edintelui Maia Sandu, arunc\u00e2nd \u00een acela\u0219i timp cu pietre \u00een gr\u0103dina Pre\u0219edin\u021biei. Doar fo\u0219tii s\u0103i colegi de partid au sus\u021binut-o\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><iframe title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/dWJsc20xVNc\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/db6c2c91187268d3\/jurnalul-orei-19-15-aprilie.html\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 15 aprilie<\/a>, <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a reflectat detaliat \u2013 peste 15 minute sau 1\/3 din emisia total\u0103 a edi\u021biei de \u0219tiri \u2013 evenimentele privind decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, inclusiv manifesta\u021bia organizat\u0103 \u00een fa\u021ba institu\u021biei. De asemenea, <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a citat reprezentan\u021bii partidelor parlamentare la subiect, precum \u0219i pe pre\u0219edinta Maia Sandu. Jurnal TV a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Titluri tenden\u021bioase: <em>\u201eFurie \u00een tab\u0103ra sociali\u0219tilor\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile: <em>\u201eCriza politic\u0103 \u0219i institu\u021bional\u0103, care dureaz\u0103 de aproape patru luni, ap\u0103rut\u0103 dup\u0103 demisia Guvernului Chicu \u00een decembrie 2020, se apropie de final\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/primelestiri.md\/ro\/primele-stiri-15-aprilie-2021-21-00---110163.html\">Prime TV<\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/cc-a-constatat-ca-sunt-intrunite-circumstantele-pentru-dizolvarea-parlamentului-_3100171.html\">Publika TV<\/a> au reflectat \u00een mare parte la fel subiectul monitorizat. <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a difuzat 3 \u0219tiri despre \u0219i cu referire la decizia Cur\u021bii privind dizolvarea Parlamentului, iar <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a publicat \u0219i\/sau difuzat 8 \u0219tiri pe platformele online \u0219i TV ale institu\u021biei. Ambele redac\u021bii au prezentat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant, oferind spa\u021biu pentru opinii \u0219i declara\u021bii tuturor celor implica\u021bi sau viza\u021bi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pe 15 martie 2021, <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a publicat 14 \u0219tiri cu referire la decizia \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi. Redac\u021bia a reflectat \u00een detalii evenimentele ce au avut loc \u00een incinta CC, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een fa\u021ba institu\u021biei. Redac\u021bia a reflectat, \u00een \u0219tiri separate, opiniile \u0219i reac\u021biile tuturor frac\u021biunilor parlamentare pe marginea deciziei CC \u0219i organiz\u0103rii alegerilor parlamentare anticipate. <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a fi semnalate abateri deontologice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a publicat, pe 15 aprilie, 16 materiale despre sau cu referire la subiectul monitorizat. Redac\u021bia a men\u021bionat \u00een acestea despre avizul CC, c\u00e2teva detalii din cadrul dezbaterilor, manifesta\u021bia organizat\u0103 \u00een fa\u021ba institu\u021biei, precum \u0219i opiniile partidelor politice \u0219i ale politicienilor pe marginea acestei decizii. <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a prezentat subiectul u\u0219or tenden\u021bios \u0219i p\u0103rtinitor, mai ales prin faptul c\u0103 a favorizat exponen\u021bi ce se opun ideii de dizolvare a Legislativului \u0219i organiz\u0103rii alegerilor parlamentare (ex. reprezentan\u021bii PSRM, exper\u021bi etc.). <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong>. <a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20210415\/34396282\/Ce-spune-liderul-PSRM-Igor-Dodon-despre-decizia-Curtii-Constitutionale-.html\">\u00cen una din \u0219tiri<\/a>, liderul PSRM, Igor Dodon, a acuzat-o pe Maia Sandu de uzurparea puterii \u00een stat \u0219i c\u0103 ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 dup\u0103 metodele lui Vladimir Plahotniuc, \u00eens\u0103 pre\u0219edintei \u0219i\/sau Pre\u0219edin\u021biei nu li s-au solicitat\/oferit dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Prezentarea selectiv\u0103 a declara\u021biilor.<\/strong> <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a citat \u00een \u0219tiri declara\u021biile PSRM, PPDA, PDM, ale Platformei \u201ePentru Moldova\u201d, Partidului Nostru \u0219i ale Pro Moldova, neglij\u00e2nd \u00eens\u0103 reac\u021bia PAS la subiect.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pe 15 aprilie, <strong>Kp.md <\/strong>publicat 3 articole ce vizeaz\u0103 subiectul monitorizat. Redac\u021bia a prezentat informa\u021bia \u00een mod superficial, tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, prezent\u00e2nd-o pe Maia Sandu \u00een lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103, \u00een timp ce reprezentan\u021bii PSRM au fost plasa\u021bi \u00een lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103. <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePre\u0219edinta Moldovei, Maia Sandu, a venit personal la \u0219edin\u021ba CC de ast\u0103zi, 15 aprilie 2021. Cum se nume\u0219te asta \u00een societ\u0103\u021bile civilizate? Presiune pe justi\u021bie?\u201d (orig. <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/4259542\/\">\u201e\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b \u041c\u0430\u0439\u044f \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443 \u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0448\u043b\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044f, 15 \u0430\u043f\u0440\u0435\u043b\u044f 2021. \u041a\u0430\u043a \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0437\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u0446\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435? \u0414\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0443\u0434?\u201d<\/a><em>)<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase \u0219i ironice\/Etichetare:<\/strong> <em>\u201eSatisfacerea Maiei Sandu: CC a hot\u0103r\u00e2t \u2013 alegerile parlamentare anticipate \u00een Moldova vor fi organizate, indiferent de pandemie\u201d (orig. <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/4260034\/\">\u201e\u0423\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443: \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0438\u043b &#8211; \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0440\u043e\u0447\u043d\u044b\u043c \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u043c \u0432\u044b\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430\u043c \u0432 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0435 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c, \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0435\u043c\u0438\u044e\u201d<\/a><em>)<\/em>; <em>\u201eLupte parlamentare \u00een Moldova: Aripa dreapt\u0103 a Maiei Sandu l-a atacat pe deputatul Vasile Bolea\u201d (orig. <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/27265\/4398921\/\">\u201e\u041f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u0439\u043d\u044b \u0432 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0435: \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0439\u0438 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0430\u043b \u043d\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u043f\u0443\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0412\u0430\u0441\u0438\u043b\u0435 \u0411\u043e\u043b\u044e\u201d<\/a><em>)<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Citarea unor surse imposibil de verificat:<\/strong> <em>\u201eTrebuie de men\u021bionat c\u0103 pre\u0219edinta Moldovei a participat personal la \u0219edin\u021ba CC, fapt care a fost calificat drept presiune \u00een adresa justi\u021biei\u201d (orig. <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/4260034\/\">\u201e\u0421\u0442\u043e\u0438\u0442 \u043e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b \u041c\u0430\u0439\u044f \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443 \u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0448\u043b\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u041a\u0421, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0434\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u201d<\/a><em>)<\/em>. <strong>KP.md<\/strong> nu a men\u021bionat de c\u0103tre cine concret este calificat\u0103 participarea pre\u0219edintei Sandu la \u0219edin\u021ba CC drept imixtiune \u00een actul justi\u021biei.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Pe 29 martie 2021, pre\u0219edinta Republicii Moldova, Maia Sandu, a depus <\/em><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constcourt.md\/public\/ccdoc\/sesizari\/71f_2021.03.29.pdf\">o sesizare<\/a><strong><em> la Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Republicii Moldova (CC) privind constatarea circumstan\u021belor care justific\u0103 dizolvarea Parlamentului. \u00cen textul sesiz\u0103rii se men\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 \u201ela data de 25 martie 2021 s-a constatat termenul de 45 de zile \u0219i cea de-a doua tentativ\u0103 de formare a Guvernului, ceea ce constituie temei de dizolvare a Parlamentului \u00een sensul art. 85 alin. (2) din Constitu\u021bie\u201d. Astfel, la 15 aprilie 2021, magistra\u021bii \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi au examinat \u00een \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 sesizarea recep\u021bionat\u0103 \u0219i au decis, prin votul a 3 din 5 judec\u0103tori, c\u0103 exist\u0103 circumstan\u021be pentru dizolvarea Parlamentului Republicii Moldova. Solicitarea de dizolvare a Legislativului \u0219i organizarea alegerilor parlamentare anticipate a fost depus\u0103 la CC dup\u0103 ce, pe 11 februarie 2021 (Cabinetul de mini\u0219tri Natalia Garili\u021ba) \u0219i, respectiv, pe 25 martie 2021 (Cabinetul de mini\u0219tri Igor Grosu), Parlamentul a e\u0219uat \u00een cele dou\u0103 tentative de \u00eenvestire a Guvernului. \u00cen primul caz (Guvernul Gavrili\u021ba) drept temei a servit <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>faptul c\u0103 nu a fost acumulat <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>niciun vot \u00een Parlament, iar \u00een al doilea (Guvernul Grosu) &#8211; lipsa de cvorum, dup\u0103 ce deputa\u021bii PSRM, ai Partidului \u0218or \u0219i cei din Platforma \u201ePentru Moldova\u201d au p\u0103r\u0103sit \u0219edin\u021ba Legislativului. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">__________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Realizarea acestui articol a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului american \u0219i poporului britanic prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite.<\/p>\n<h6>Surs\u0103 foto: Diez.md<\/h6>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subiectul privind decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Republicii Moldova (CC) pe marginea dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului a fost reflectat de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media. Unele (Sputnik.md, Unimedia.info, Jurnal TV) l-au abordat amplu \u0219i detaliat \u00een materialele difuzate sau publicate, iar altele l-au tratat superficial (NTV Moldova, Kp.md). Cu excep\u021bia Prime TV, Publika TV \u0219i Unimedia.info, celelalte redac\u021bii<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":15627,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale privind dizolvarea Parlamentului, \u00eentre prezentarea selectiv\u0103 a declara\u021biilor \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103 - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Subiectul privind decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Republicii Moldova (CC) pe marginea dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului a fost reflectat de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media. Unele (Sputnik.md, Unimedia.info, Jurnal TV) l-au abordat amplu \u0219i detaliat \u00een materialele difuzate sau publicate, iar altele l-au tratat superficial (NTV Moldova, Kp.md). Cu excep\u021bia Prime TV, Publika TV \u0219i Unimedia.info, celelalte redac\u021biiMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-20T10:24:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-23T11:45:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/curtea-constitutionala.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"546\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/curtea-constitutionala.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":546},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Decizia Cur\\u021bii Constitu\\u021bionale privind dizolvarea Parlamentului, \\u00eentre prezentarea selectiv\\u0103 a declara\\u021biilor \\u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\\u0103 - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-20T10:24:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-23T11:45:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/cf78236650c3302660745f2495ae9efe\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-privind-dizolvarea-parlamentului-intre-prezentarea-selectiva-a-declaratilor-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/cf78236650c3302660745f2495ae9efe\",\"name\":\"Bivol Liliana\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16018"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16018"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16018\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16066,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16018\/revisions\/16066"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}