{"id":15946,"date":"2021-04-07T14:52:11","date_gmt":"2021-04-07T14:52:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=15946"},"modified":"2021-04-13T09:30:04","modified_gmt":"2021-04-13T09:30:04","slug":"o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/","title":{"rendered":"O viitoare decizie a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, reflectat\u0103 cu amestec de fapte \u0219i opinii \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Portalul Today.md a publicat pe 6 aprilie o \u0219tire cu titlul: \u201e<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/today.md\/2021\/04\/06\/surse-decizia-cc-privind-stabilirea-circumstantelor-dizolvarii-parlamentului-este-deja-luata\/\"><strong>SURSE | Decizia CC privind stabilirea circumstan\u021belor dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului este deja luat\u0103<\/strong><\/a><strong>\u201d. Redac\u021bia informeaz\u0103, f\u0103c\u00e2nd trimitere la surse anonime, c\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 (CC) <\/strong><strong>\u201ea luat deja decizia privind stabilirea circumstan\u021belor dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului\u201d.<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Chiar dac\u0103 redac\u021bia sus\u021bine c\u0103 informa\u021biile din \u0219tire provin de la surse ale portalului Today.md, cele invocate sunt acuza\u021bii grave la adresa CC, fapt care ar fi trebuit echilibrat prin oferirea replicii institu\u021biei vizate.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mai mult, autorii articolului recurg la opinii proprii, potrivit c\u0103rora \u201epre\u021bul pl\u0103tit de c\u0103tre \u00cenalta instan\u021b\u0103 este discreditarea \u0219i decredibilizarea total\u0103 a CC, inclusiv \u00een fa\u021ba Comisiei de la Vene\u021bia\u201d \u0219i opereaz\u0103 cu mai multe aprecieri &#8211; \u201ecu at\u00e2t inexplicabil\u0103 \u0219i d\u0103un\u0103toare credibilit\u0103\u021bii Cur\u021bii este sfidarea propriei jurispruden\u021bei <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">cu c\u00e2t la moment CC de\u021bine pre\u0219edin\u021bia Conferin\u021bei Cur\u021bilor Constitu\u021bionale Europene<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A doua zi dup\u0103 publicarea \u0219tirii, pre\u0219edinta CC, Domnica Manole, a reac\u021bionat pe pagina oficial\u0103 a institu\u021biei \u0219i neag\u0103 \u201ecu fermitate informa\u021biile calomniatoare publicate de portalul Today.md\u201d, men\u021bion\u00e2nd c\u0103 \u201enu au fost f\u0103cute presiuni din partea nim\u0103nui \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu Avizul care va fi pronun\u021bat de Curte \u00een perioada imediat urm\u0103toare. Sunt un judec\u0103tor independent care va vota pe baza unei analize depline a textelor constitu\u021bionale \u0219i a jurispruden\u021bei relevante a Cur\u021bii\u201d.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Potrivit <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/consiliuldepresa.md\/ro\/page\/codul-deontologic-al-jurnalistului-din-r-moldova\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Codului deontologic<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, \u201e<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jurnalistul trebuie s\u0103 ob\u021bin\u0103 \u0219i s\u0103 prezinte opinia tuturor p\u0103r\u021bilor relevante pentru subiect. Jurnalistul trebuie s\u0103 demonstreze pluralitatea de opinii, chiar dac\u0103 nu este de acord cu acestea<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Acela\u0219i cod prevede c\u0103 \u201ejurnalistul trebuie s\u0103 fac\u0103 o distinc\u021bie clar\u0103 \u00eentre fapte \u0219i opinii \u0219i s\u0103 nu prezinte opiniile drept fapte\u201d. \u0218i <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/media-azi.md\/ro\/deontologie\/ghidul-de-stil-cu-norme-etice-pentru-jurnali%C5%9Fti\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ghidul cu norme etice<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> aten\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 \u201e\u00een prezentarea evenimentelor, vom face o distinc\u0163ie clar\u0103 \u00eentre informa\u0163ie \u015fi opinie, evit\u00e2ndu-se orice confuzie. \u015etirile sunt fapte \u015fi date. (\u2026) Opiniile exprimate sub form\u0103 de comentarii ale unor evenimente sau ac\u0163iuni cu referin\u0163\u0103 la persoane sau institu\u0163ii nu trebuie s\u0103 nege sau s\u0103 ascund\u0103 \u00een mod inten\u0163ionat fapte sau date reale. Vom \u00eensera opiniile \u00eentr-un articol informativ doar din partea unei surse intervievate sau citate, dar niciodat\u0103 din partea reporterului. (\u2026) Vom evita s\u0103 ne spunem opinia \u00een articolele de \u015ftiri\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<h6 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\nCaptur\u0103 foto: today.md\u00a0<\/span><\/h6>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Portalul Today.md a publicat pe 6 aprilie o \u0219tire cu titlul: \u201eSURSE | Decizia CC privind stabilirea circumstan\u021belor dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului este deja luat\u0103\u201d. Redac\u021bia informeaz\u0103, f\u0103c\u00e2nd trimitere la surse anonime, c\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 (CC) \u201ea luat deja decizia privind stabilirea circumstan\u021belor dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului\u201d.\u00a0 Chiar dac\u0103 redac\u021bia sus\u021bine c\u0103 informa\u021biile din \u0219tire provin de la surse<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":15947,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[10],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"O viitoare decizie a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, reflectat\u0103 cu amestec de fapte \u0219i opinii \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103 - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Portalul Today.md a publicat pe 6 aprilie o \u0219tire cu titlul: \u201eSURSE | Decizia CC privind stabilirea circumstan\u021belor dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului este deja luat\u0103\u201d. Redac\u021bia informeaz\u0103, f\u0103c\u00e2nd trimitere la surse anonime, c\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 (CC) \u201ea luat deja decizia privind stabilirea circumstan\u021belor dizolv\u0103rii Parlamentului\u201d.\u00a0 Chiar dac\u0103 redac\u021bia sus\u021bine c\u0103 informa\u021biile din \u0219tire provin de la surseMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-07T14:52:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-13T09:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-04-07-17.50.45.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"808\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"552\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-04-07-17.50.45.png\",\"width\":808,\"height\":552},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\",\"name\":\"O viitoare decizie a Cur\\u021bii Constitu\\u021bionale, reflectat\\u0103 cu amestec de fapte \\u0219i opinii \\u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\\u0103 - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-07T14:52:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-13T09:30:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/cf78236650c3302660745f2495ae9efe\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/o-viitoare-decizie-a-curtii-constitutionale-reflectata-cu-amestec-de-fapte-si-opinii-si-lipsa-dreptului-la-replica\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/cf78236650c3302660745f2495ae9efe\",\"name\":\"Bivol Liliana\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15946"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15946"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15946\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15967,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15946\/revisions\/15967"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}