{"id":15607,"date":"2021-02-26T16:01:43","date_gmt":"2021-02-26T16:01:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=15607"},"modified":"2021-04-21T04:27:36","modified_gmt":"2021-04-21T04:27:36","slug":"studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale (CC) privind desemnarea repetat\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba la func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103 \u2013 \u00eentre \u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Subiectul privind decizia CC pe marginea desemn\u0103rii repetate a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba la func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103 a fost abordat diferit de cele 12 institu\u021bii media. <\/strong><strong>\u00cen timp<\/strong><strong>\u00a0ce unele au prezentat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant (Moldova 1, RTR Moldova,<br \/>\nJu<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: justify;\">rnal TV), altele au admis numeroase abateri deontologice \u0219i tehnici de manipulare (Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova, NTV Moldova, KP.md). S-a observat o reflectare foarte asem\u0103n\u0103toare a subiectului \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te scenariul \u0219tirilor, textele c\u00e2t \u0219i secven\u021bele video utilizate: Primul \u00een Moldova, Accent TV \u0219i NTV Moldova, pe de o parte, \u0219i Prime TV \u0219i Publika TV pe de alt\u0103 parte. Printre cele mai des admise abateri deontologice se num\u0103r\u0103 amestecul dintre fapte \u0219i opinii, lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103 \u0219i titlurile tenden\u021bioase. Tehnicile de manipulare la care s-a recurs cel mai mult sunt tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional, generalizarea, estomparea informa\u021biei \u0219i tehnica de manipulare a du\u0219manului intern.<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-15929 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help-350x293.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"447\" height=\"374\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help-350x293.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help-150x126.png 150w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/fb-training-images-felix-help.png 940w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 447px) 100vw, 447px\" \/><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-23-februarie-2021\">\u00cen \u201eMesagerul\u201d din 23 februarie 2021<\/a>, <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 materiale despre decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale (CC) pe marginea decretului pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu privind desemnarea repetat\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba la func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103. Televiziunea public\u0103 a deschis buletinul informativ cu o interven\u021bie \u00een direct a reporterului (Alexandru Albu), la finalul c\u0103reia a inclus declara\u021bia pre\u0219edintei CC, Domnica Manole. A doua \u0219tire a inclus reac\u021biile\/opiniile partidelor parlamentare pe marginea acestei decizii. \u00cen ambele materiale, <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia neutru, echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 abateri, oferind dreptul la replic\u0103 tuturor p\u0103r\u021bilor implicate \u0219i\/sau vizate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat, \u00een buletinul informativ <a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/sinteza-zilei-18-30-lansarea-oficiala-23-02-2021\/\">\u201eSinteza zilei\u201d din 23 februarie 2021<\/a>. \u00cen una din ele, jurnali\u0219tii postului TV s-au referit la decizia CC, comentat\u0103 de c\u00e2\u021biva exper\u021bi \u00een drept constitu\u021bional. A doua \u0219tire a vizat opinia lui Igor Dodon, pre\u0219edintele Partidului Sociali\u0219tilor (PSRM), pe marginea deciziei \u0219i inclusiv atacurile acestuia asupra activit\u0103\u021bii pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu, precum \u0219i disponibilitatea exprimat\u0103 de liderul Partidului \u201ePlatforma Demnitate \u0219i Adev\u0103r\u201d (PPDA), Andrei N\u0103stase, de a forma un cabinet de mini\u0219tri. <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i a comis mai multe abateri deontologice. Redac\u021bia a favorizat deschis PSRM \u0219i pe reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid \u0219i nu a garantat dreptul la replic\u0103 celor viza\u021bi (Maia Sandu). Astfel, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong> <em>\u201eMaia Sandu a \u00eenc\u0103lcat Constitu\u021bia\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePotrivit deciziei, Maia Sandu este obligat\u0103 s\u0103 organizeze noi consult\u0103ri, iar \u00een cadrul acestora s\u0103 ia \u00een considerare cele 54 de semn\u0103turi \u00een favoarea unui candidat. Nu este clar \u00eens\u0103, la aceast\u0103 <\/em><em>etap\u0103, dac\u0103 \u0219eful statului va proceda astfel\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em>\u201e<\/em><em>Exper\u021bii constitu\u021bionali s-au expus asupra deciziei \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Pre\u0219edinta Maia Sandu a fost acuzat\u0103 de Igor Dodon de <em>\u201euzurparea puterii \u00ee<\/em><em>n stat\u201d<\/em>, dar acesteia nu i s-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tehnica de manipulare a du\u0219manului intern\/\u021bapului isp\u0103\u0219<\/strong><strong>itor<\/strong>. Prin modul \u00een care a fost prezentat\u0103 informa\u021bia \u00een cele dou\u0103 \u0219tiri \u2013 inclusiv prin neasigurarea dreptului la replic\u0103 a celor viza\u021bi (Maia Sandu \u0219i Partidul Ac\u021biune \u0219i Solidaritate) \u2013, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a \u00eencercat o diabolizare a pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu \u0219i a acuzat-o de criza politic\u0103 din \u021bar\u0103.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a difuzat trei \u0219tiri despre decizia CC privind decretul pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu de desemnare repetat\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba.<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"\u0218tiri Primul \u00een Moldova 23 februarie 2021\" width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/A0th50l-_sQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Televiziunea a deschis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=A0th50l-_sQ&amp;feature=emb_logo\">buletinul informativ din 23 februarie 2021<\/a> cu o \u0219tire despre evenimentele ce au avut loc la CC \u00een acea zi, continu\u00e2nd cu o \u0219tire \u00een care a prezentat opinia extins\u0103 a lui Igor Dodon pe marginea acestei decizii \u0219i solicitarea PSRM c\u0103tre Maia Sandu, ca cea din urm\u0103 s\u0103 o \u00eenainteze pe Mariana Durle\u0219teanu la func\u021bia de candidat\u0103 la \u0219efia Guvernului. A treia \u0219tire a expus opinia a doi exper\u021bi constitu\u021bionali pe marginea deciziei \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi. Toate cele trei \u0219tiri au fost reflectate de <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, fiind comise mai multe abateri deontologice:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong> <em>\u201eLec\u021bie pentru Maia Sandu\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e<\/em><em>Maia Sandu, pus\u0103 <\/em><em>la respect de CC\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePre\u0219edintele Maia Sandu a primit o lec\u021b<\/em><em>ie de constitu\u021bionalitate din partea magistra\u021bilor \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi\u201d; \u201eMaia Sandu a \u00eenc\u0103lcat legea suprem\u0103. Curtea Constitu\u021b<\/em><em>ional\u0103 <\/em><em>a admis par\u021bial sesizarea deputa\u021bilor sociali\u0219<\/em><em>ti \u0219i a declarat neconstitu\u021bional decretul \u0219efului statului\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Estomparea informa\u021biei\/declara\u021biilor \u0219i prezentarea selectiv\u0103 \u0219<\/strong><strong>i dispropor\u021b<\/strong><strong>ionat\u0103 a opiniilor<\/strong>. \u00cen \u0219tirile difuzate, <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> s-a eschivat s\u0103 men\u021bioneze c\u0103 solicitarea PSRM c\u0103tre CC a fost admis\u0103 <em>\u201epar\u021bial\u201d<\/em>. De asemenea, redac\u021bia a accentuat opiniile reprezentan\u021bilor PSRM, pe de o parte \u0219i a inclus ni\u0219te declara\u021bii irelevante ale reprezentantei pre\u0219edin\u021biei (Olesea Stamate). Totodat\u0103, reprezentan\u021bilor PSRM le-a fost atribuit un spa\u021biu de emisie de 5 ori mai mare dec\u00e2t celorlal\u021bi protagoni\u0219ti pentru cit\u0103ri directe: 3 interven\u021bii cu un total de aproape 2 minute fa\u021b\u0103 de o singur\u0103 interven\u021bie de 10 secunde. Mai mult, \u00een cazul reprezentantei pre\u0219edin\u021biei, jurnali\u0219tii de la <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> au trunchiat declara\u021biile, select\u00e2nd tenden\u021bios \u0219i difuz\u00e2nd secven\u021be care nu au \u00eentregit \u0219tirea, dar au creat confuzie (declara\u021bii neelocvente \u0219i neesen\u021biale pentru subiectul \u0219tirii);<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Una din \u0219tiri a fost f\u0103cut\u0103 doar \u00een baza declara\u021biei lui Igor Dodon, \u00een care acesta a acuzat-o pe pre\u0219edinta Maia Sandu \u0219i PAS de \u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d. Primul \u00een Moldova nu a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103 niciunuia dintre cei viza\u021bi;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em>\u201e<\/em><em>Exper\u021bii \u00een drept constitu\u021b<\/em><em>ional declar\u0103 c\u0103 \u00cenalta Curte a constatat \u00eenc\u0103<\/em><em>lc\u0103ri grave ale Constitu\u021biei, pe care le-a admis Maia Sandu&#8230;\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e&#8230; mai mult, juri\u0219tii las\u0103 s\u0103 se \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 c\u0103 \u0219<\/em><em>i consult\u0103rile anterioare au fost mai mult mimate\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201ePentru c\u0103 <\/em><em>exist\u0103 deja un candidat propus de o majoritate parlamentar\u0103 formalizat\u0103<\/em><em>, pre\u0219edintele Maia Sandu urmeaz\u0103 s\u0103-l accepte. Totodat\u0103<\/em><em>, exper\u021bii nu exclud c\u0103 \u0219i \u00een parlament ar putea avea loc unele jocuri&#8230;\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tehnica de manipulare a du\u0219manului intern\/\u021bapului isp\u0103\u0219<\/strong><strong>itor<\/strong>. Prin modul \u00een care au fost elaborate cele trei \u0219tiri, <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a dat de \u00een\u021beles c\u0103 Maia Sandu poart\u0103 \u00eentreaga vin\u0103 pentru criza politic\u0103 \u00een care s-a pomenit Republica Moldova.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a abordat subiectul \u00eentr-un stil similar celor de la <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> \u0219i <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"\u0218tirile orei 19.00 NTV Moldova. 23.02.21\" width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/r1OHMpN4tHM?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen prima \u0219tire din <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=r1OHMpN4tHM&amp;feature=emb_logo\">buletinul informativ din 23 februarie 2021<\/a>, postul a titrat c\u0103 <em>\u201epre\u0219<\/em><em>edintele a sfidat Constitu\u021bia\u201d<\/em>. \u00cen \u0219tire au fost incluse opiniile reprezentan\u021bilor PSRM, ale consilierei pre\u0219edintei \u021b\u0103rii, Olesea Stamate, \u0219i ale reprezentantului Parlamentului, Valeriu Kuciuk. A doua \u0219tire a fost despre motiva\u021bia CC pe marginea deciziei luate; \u00een a treia, redac\u021bia a vorbit despre reac\u021bia lui Igor Dodon, iar a patra \u0219tire se refer\u0103 la reac\u021biile exper\u021bilor care consider\u0103 c\u0103 <em>\u201eindiferent de op\u021biunile politice, \u0219eful statului este legat de jur\u0103m\u00e2<\/em><em>nt s\u0103 respecte legea suprem\u0103\u201d<\/em>. \u00cen reflectarea informa\u021biei, <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePre\u0219<\/em><em>edintele a sfidat Constitu\u021bia\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em>\u201eMaia Sandu a fost pus\u0103 la respect de Curtea Constitu\u021b<\/em><em>ional\u0103&#8230; Deputa\u021bii sociali\u0219ti au adus argumentele necesare prin care \u0219eful statului face legea dup\u0103 propriul moft \u0219i nu \u00een conformitate cu prevederile Constitu\u021biei\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Maia Sandu a fost acuzat\u0103 de Igor Dodon de uzurparea puterii \u00een stat, dar acesteia nu i s-a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare: <\/strong><em>\u201eHot\u0103r\u00e2rea CC o oblig\u0103 pe pre\u0219edintele Maia Sandu s\u0103 <\/em><em>revin\u0103 \u00een spa\u021biul constitu\u021b<\/em><em> A\u0219a au comentat exper\u021bii decizia instan\u021b<\/em><em>ei\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Preluarea unor imagini video f\u0103r\u0103 a cita sursa direct\u0103. NTV Moldova <\/strong>a preluat imagini video de la o alt\u0103 institu\u021bie media (<strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong>) f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 fac\u0103 trimitere la sursa primar\u0103.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>TV6<\/strong> a deschis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=cHAdhE1TppU\">buletinul informativ din 23 februarie 2021<\/a> cu \u0219tirea despre decizia CC. \u00cen cadrul acesteia, <strong>TV6<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> Dac\u0103 <em>\u201eVasile Bolea a declarat c\u0103&#8230;\u201d<\/em>, atunci <em>\u201e\u00een ap\u0103rarea \u0219efului statului a s\u0103rit consilierul s\u0103u pe justi\u021b<\/em><em>ie, Olesea Stamate&#8230;\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Trimiterea la surse imposibil de verificat\/Generalizare: <\/strong><em>\u201eDecizia a st\u00e2rnit un val de critici. Politicieni \u0219i anali\u0219ti au declarat c\u0103 \u0219eful statului a \u00eenc\u0103lcat o decizie a Cur\u021bii&#8230;\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe title=\"2021-02-23 | 19:00 \u0218tiri la TV6\" width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/cHAdhE1TppU?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a reflectat subiectul monitorizat \u00een trei \u0219tiri, primele \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/primelestiri.md\/ro\/primele-stiri-23-februarie-2021-21-00---108113.html\">buletinul informativ din 23 februarie 2021<\/a>. \u00cen una dintre ele, redac\u021bia canalului a informat despre decizia CC \u0219i evenimentele care au avut loc \u00een incinta, dar \u0219i \u00een fa\u021ba sediului \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi (protestul), \u00eentr-o alt\u0103 \u0219tire au fost expuse reac\u021biile politicienilor \u0219i partidelor politice, iar a treia a inclus declara\u021biile Maiei Sandu pe marginea deciziei. <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titluri ironice:<\/strong> <em>\u201eCurtea i-a spus <\/em><em>\u00abPAS<\/em><em>\u00bb pre\u0219edintelui\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em>\u201e\u0218edin\u021ba CC a durat aproape 6 ore \u0219i jum\u0103tate \u0219i s-a l\u0103sat cu replici acide \u00eentre cele dou\u0103 <\/em><em>tabere\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/decretul-maiei-sandu-neconstitutional_3096523.html\">Publika TV<\/a> a reflectat subiectul monitorizat conform unui scenariu similar celui de la <strong>Prime TV<\/strong>. Totu\u0219i, <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> nu admis abaterile deontologice men\u021bionate \u00een cazul <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> \u00een prezentarea informa\u021biei.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat, care au deschis <a href=\"https:\/\/rtr.md\/vesti-moldova\/102215447\/\">buletinul informativ din 23 februarie 2021<\/a>. \u00cen prima, canalul a informat despre decizia CC \u0219i care ar putea fi consecin\u021bele acesteia, iar \u00een a doua redac\u021bia a men\u021bionat despre opiniile politicienilor \u0219i a frac\u021biunilor parlamentare pe marginea subiectului. <strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant \u0219i nu a admis abateri deontologice sau tehnici de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a reflectat subiectul deciziei CC \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/10cfe65c4172c985\/jurnalul-orei-19-23-februarie.html\">buletinul informativ din 23 februarie 2021<\/a>, difuz\u00e2nd trei \u0219tiri \u00een care au informat despre decizia CC, reac\u021bia unor politicieni \u0219i partide politice parlamentare \u0219i a c\u00e2torva exper\u021bi \u0219i anali\u0219ti politici pe marginea acestui subiect. <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a comite abateri deontologice sau tehnici de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Pe 23 februarie 2021, <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a publicat 11 \u0219tiri referitoare la decizia CC privind decretul pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu de desemnarea repetat\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba \u00een func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103. \u00cen una din \u0219tiri, <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a f\u0103cut o transmisiune direct\u0103 &#8211; at\u00e2t text, c\u00e2t \u0219i video &#8211; a evenimentelor de la CC. De asemenea, portalul a scris despre protestul din fa\u021ba Cur\u021bii, organizat de un grup de manifestan\u021bi \u0219i a expus \u00een \u0219tiri separate opiniile unor politicieni \u0219i partide politice parlamentare pe marginea deciziei CC. <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> prezentat pe alocuri neechidistant informa\u021bia \u0219i a favorizat u\u0219or PSRM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid \u2013 \u00een special pe Igor Dodon \u0219i Corneliu Furculi\u021b\u0103, pre\u0219edintele frac\u021biunii parlamentare a PSRM, mai ales prin spa\u021biul generos dedicat celor doi pentru a fi cita\u021bi direct \u2013, prezent\u00e2ndu-i \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103. Pe de alt\u0103 parte, pre\u0219edinta Maia Sandu \u0219i PAS au fost reflecta\u021bi \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 u\u0219or negativ\u0103. <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/0fd90d13cb8ff8a5\/video-reactia-lui-andrei-nastase-la-decizia-curtii-constitutionale.html\">Sugestie:<\/a> <em>\u201eMaia Sandu \u0219i partidul pe care l-a condus pledeaz\u0103 pentru alegeri anticipate, \u00een orice condi\u021bii&#8230;\u201d, \u201e\u0218i PSRM \u00ee\u0219i dore\u0219te alegeri anticipate, \u00eens\u0103 e nevoie ca p\u00e2n\u0103 <\/em><em>la scrutin \u021b<\/em><em>ara s\u0103 <\/em><em>aib\u0103 un Guvern cu puteri depline, care s\u0103 gestioneze criza pandemic\u0103 \u0219i cea economic\u0103&#8230;\u201d<\/em> &#8211; sintagm\u0103 repetat\u0103 \u00een 9 din cele 11 \u0219tiri;<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/1fe67eba7ab908de\/video-maia-sandu-refuza-sa-mai-inainteze-vreun-canditat-la-functia-de-premier-la-anticipate-sau-la-referendum-oamenii-vor-decide.html\">Trimiterea la surse imposibil de verificat:<\/a> <em>\u201eUnii exper\u021bi prognozeaz\u0103 o criz\u0103 <\/em><em>constitu\u021b<\/em><em>ional\u0103, pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 cea politic\u0103<\/em><em>, sanitar\u0103 \u0219<\/em><em>i economic\u0103 \u00een care se afl\u0103 Republica Moldova\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-15618 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-18.08.08-350x244.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"244\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-18.08.08-350x244.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-18.08.08-150x105.png 150w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-18.08.08.png 588w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a publicat 12 materiale la subiectul monitorizat, care s-au referit la decizia CC \u0219i evenimentele ce au avut loc la \u00cenalta Curte \u00een ziua de 23 februarie 2021, motiva\u021bia Cur\u021bii, opinia partidelor politice parlamentare pe marginea acestei decizii, reac\u021bia Maiei Sandu, a ministrului Justi\u021biei, Fadei Nagacevschi, \u0219i a unor exper\u021bi pe marginea deciziei CC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a admis \u00een \u0219tirile publicate c\u00e2teva abateri, printre acestea:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20210223\/33731801\/CC-examineaz-sesizarea-socialitilor---detalii-.html\">Generalizare:<\/a> <em>\u201eDecizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale de pe 16 februarie a fost comentat\u0103 <\/em><em>de exper\u021bii \u00een domeniu\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20210223\/33748384\/Dodon-decizia-CC.html\">Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/a> Una din sursele unei \u0219tiri (Igor Dodon) a acuzat-o pe Maia Sandu \u0219i PAS de tentativ\u0103 de uzurpare a puterii \u00een stat. <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> avea misiunea s\u0103 asigure dreptul la replic\u0103 celor viza\u021bi, ceea ce nu a f\u0103cut \u00eens\u0103.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20210223\/33748504\/Domnica-Manole-o-pune-la-punct-pe-Maia-Sandu-.html\">Titluri tenden\u021bioase\/Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/a> <em>\u201eDomnica Manole o pune la punct pe Maia Sandu\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a publicat patru materiale despre decizia CC din ziua de 23 februarie 2021.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-15612 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-17.54.03-350x261.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"261\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-17.54.03-350x261.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-17.54.03-150x112.png 150w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2021-02-26-17.54.03.png 719w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/>Redac\u021bia a reflectat subiectul \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, cu mai multe abateri deontologice, printre care:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/27243\/4371970\/?utm_campaign=internal&amp;utm_medium=section_politics_page%25253D1&amp;utm_source=quote_preview&amp;utm_term=11\">\u201eDomnica Manole a pus-o la punct pe Maia Sandu\u201d<\/a><em> (rus\u0103: \u0414\u043e\u043c\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043d\u043e\u043b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e \u041c\u0430\u0439\u044e \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443)<\/em>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/27241\/4371993\/?utm_campaign=internal&amp;utm_medium=section_politics_page%25253D1&amp;utm_source=quote_preview&amp;utm_term=17\">\u201eCu ni\u0219te aere de procuror, Maia Sandu a organizat un briefing dup\u0103 decizia CC\u201d<\/a><em> (rus\u0103: <\/em><em>\u0421 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443\u0440\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0431\u0440\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043d\u0433 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430)<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/27241\/4371993\/?utm_campaign=internal&amp;utm_medium=section_politics_page%25253D1&amp;utm_source=quote_preview&amp;utm_term=17\">Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/a> <em>\u201ePre\u0219edintele va continua s\u0103 lupte cu Parlamentul\u201d (rus\u0103: <\/em><em>\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442 <\/em><em>\u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b <\/em><em>\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0438\u0442 <\/em><em>\u0432\u043e\u0435\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c <\/em><em>\u0441 <\/em><em>\u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043c)<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/27243\/4371946\/?utm_campaign=internal&amp;utm_medium=section_politics_page%25253D1&amp;utm_source=quote_preview&amp;utm_term=12\">Tehnica de manipulare a Salvatorului na\u021bional\/Mesia:<\/a> <em>\u201ePartidul Sociali\u0219tilor, ca cea mai mare frac\u021biune din Parlament, este preg\u0103tit s\u0103 fac\u0103 tot ce este necesar pentru a ie\u0219i rapid din aceast\u0103 <\/em><em>criz\u0103\u201d (rus\u0103: \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u0441\u043e\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0432, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043a\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043d\u0435\u0439\u0448\u0430\u044f \u0444\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0432 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0435, \u043f\u043e-<\/em><em>\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0436\u043d\u0435\u043c\u0443 <\/em><em>\u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 <\/em><em>\u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0442\u044c <\/em><em>\u0432\u0441\u0451 <\/em><em>\u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 <\/em><em>\u0434\u043b\u044f <\/em><em>\u0431\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0433\u043e <\/em><em>\u0432\u044b\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0430 <\/em><em>\u0438\u0437 <\/em><em>\u044d\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e <\/em><em>\u043a\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0441\u0430)<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>La 16 februarie 2021, Curtea Constitu\u021b<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>ional\u0103 a Republicii Moldova a pronun\u021bat decizia prin care a respins cererea de suspendare a decretului pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu, din 11 februarie, privind desemnarea repetat\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> la func\u021bia de prim-ministru. Decizia magistra\u021bilor \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi este definitiv\u0103 \u0219i nu poate fi supus\u0103 niciunei c\u0103i de atac. Totodat\u0103<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>, CC a men\u021bionat c\u0103 pe 23 februarie 2021 va examina \u00een fond sesizarea depus\u0103 <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>de deputa\u021bii sociali\u0219ti Vasile Bolea, Grigore Novac \u0219i Alexandr Suhodolski privind constitu\u021bionalitatea decretului pre\u0219edintei Maia Sandu. <\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<strong><em>\u00cen \u0219edin\u021ba din 23 februarie, CC a examinat sesizarea deputa\u021bilor<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> sociali\u0219<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>ti \u0219i a declarat <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>decretul drept neconstitu\u021b<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>ional. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>__________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Realizarea acestui articol a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului american \u0219i poporului britanic prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite.<\/em><\/p>\n<h6><em>Sursa foto: diez.md<\/em><\/h6>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subiectul privind decizia CC pe marginea desemn\u0103rii repetate a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba la func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103 a fost abordat diferit de cele 12 institu\u021bii media. \u00cen timp\u00a0ce unele au prezentat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant (Moldova 1, RTR Moldova, Jurnal TV), altele au admis numeroase abateri deontologice \u0219i tehnici de manipulare (Accent TV, Primul \u00een<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":15627,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale (CC) privind desemnarea repetat\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba la func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103 \u2013 \u00eentre \u201euzurparea puterii \u00een stat\u201d \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103 - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Subiectul privind decizia CC pe marginea desemn\u0103rii repetate a Nataliei Gavrili\u021ba la func\u021bia de prim-ministr\u0103 a fost abordat diferit de cele 12 institu\u021bii media. \u00cen timp\u00a0ce unele au prezentat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant (Moldova 1, RTR Moldova, Jurnal TV), altele au admis numeroase abateri deontologice \u0219i tehnici de manipulare (Accent TV, Primul \u00eenMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-26T16:01:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-21T04:27:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/curtea-constitutionala.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"546\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/curtea-constitutionala.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":546},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Decizia Cur\\u021bii Constitu\\u021bionale (CC) privind desemnarea repetat\\u0103 a Nataliei Gavrili\\u021ba la func\\u021bia de prim-ministr\\u0103 \\u2013 \\u00eentre \\u201euzurparea puterii \\u00een stat\\u201d \\u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\\u0103 - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-26T16:01:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-21T04:27:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/cf78236650c3302660745f2495ae9efe\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-curtii-constitutionale-cc-privind-desemnarea-repetata-a-nataliei-gavrilita-la-functia-de-prim-ministra-intre-uzurparea-puterii-in-stat-si-lipsa-dre\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/cf78236650c3302660745f2495ae9efe\",\"name\":\"Bivol Liliana\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15607"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15607"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15607\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16035,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15607\/revisions\/16035"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}