{"id":14009,"date":"2020-07-28T05:48:48","date_gmt":"2020-07-28T05:48:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=14009"},"modified":"2020-08-04T14:09:48","modified_gmt":"2020-08-04T14:09:48","slug":"studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. \u201eCirc\u201d \u0219i \u201ehaos\u201d: cum au relatat 12 institu\u021bii de pres\u0103 despre mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Subiectul privind mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu \u0219i dezbaterile din 20 iulie din cadrul Legislativului a<img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-13080 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/img-studii-de-caz.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"454\" height=\"381\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/img-studii-de-caz.png 940w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/img-studii-de-caz-350x293.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 454px) 100vw, 454px\" \/> fost reflectat de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Fiecare a abordat \u00eens\u0103 diferit informa\u021bia, \u00een mare parte prin prisma preferin\u021belor politice. NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova, Sputnik.md \u0219i Kp.md au favorizat \u0219i au prezentat \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103 Guvernul Chicu \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii Partidului Sociali\u0219tilor; \u00een cazul Prime TV \u0219i Publika TV a fost identificat\u0103 o u\u0219oar\u0103 favorizare a partidelor de opozi\u021bie; Televiziunea Central\u0103 a favorizat Partidul \u0218or, iar Jurnal TV a pus \u00een lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103 Partidul Demnitate \u0219i Adev\u0103r. Cu excep\u021bia RTR Moldova, celelalte institu\u021bii monitorizate au admis cel pu\u021bin o abatere deontologic\u0103. Cele mai des utilizate au fost amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor \u0219i lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103, urmate de selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a declara\u021biilor \u0219i etichet\u0103ri.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Totodat\u0103, mai multe institu\u021bii media au recurs la tehnica de manipulare a du\u0219manului intern, folosit\u0103 la pachet cu cea a Salvatorului na\u021bional (NTV Moldova, Primul \u00een Moldova, Accent TV). De asemenea, unele institu\u021bii media au estompat inten\u021bionat anumite detalii referitoare la subiectul monitorizat, fie prezent\u00e2nd doar opinii, fie accentu\u00e2nd doar viziunile unei singure p\u0103r\u021bi implicate (NTV Moldova, Kp.md). Au existat \u0219i redac\u021bii care au pus accentul pe elementul senza\u021bional \u0219i de scandal al subiectului, la fel diminu\u00e2nd importan\u021ba acestuia (Primul \u00een Moldova).\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/35373\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire de 8 minute \u0219i 45 secunde despre mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu \u0219i dezbaterile din Parlament.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/SByeVKdKzKY?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Postul de televiziune a prezentat dezechilibrat \u0219i tenden\u021bios informa\u021bia \u0219i a admis mai multe abateri deontologice \u0219i tehnici de manipulare. Printre acestea:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Schimbarea cursului logic al unei \u0219tiri.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Prezentarea ini\u021bial\u0103 a opiniilor \u0219i apoi a faptelor. \u00centreaga \u0219tire s-a concentrat pe raportul premierului Ion Chicu, f\u0103r\u0103 a fi men\u021bionate detalii din mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 depus\u0103 de PAS \u0219i PPDA;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eOpozi\u021bia a \u00eencercat s\u0103 z\u0103d\u0103rniceasc\u0103 prezentarea de c\u0103tre premierul Ion Chicu a raportului \u00een contextul mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Etichet\u0103ri:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201ePartidele conduse de Maia Sandu, Andrei N\u0103stase \u0219i oligarhul fugar Ilan \u0218or au \u00eencercat s\u0103 perturbe procesul prin strig\u0103te \u0219i trop\u0103ial\u0103. \u00cen ciuda acestui haos creat de opozi\u021bie, \u0219eful Cabinetului de mini\u0219tri \u0219i-a continuat discursul\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase\/Etichet\u0103ri:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eAlian\u021ba Haosului \u00een parlament\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Tehnica du\u0219manului intern\/Tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Pe de o parte, opozi\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103 \u00een context negativ, fiind acuzat\u0103 \u0219i \u00eenvinuit\u0103 de problemele cu care se confrunt\u0103 \u021bara. Pe de alt\u0103 parte, Cabinetul Chicu a fost prezentat \u00een context pozitiv, drept guvernul care a reu\u0219it s\u0103 fac\u0103 doar lucruri bune pentru cet\u0103\u021benii \u021b\u0103rii;\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Prezentarea\/includerea dezechilibrat\u0103 a declara\u021biilor.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Autorii au inclus \u00een \u0219tire 5 declara\u021bii directe ale premierului Ion Chicu, cu un timp total de emisie de 6 minute, \u00een timp ce declara\u021biile\/opiniile reprezentan\u021bilor opozi\u021biei nu au fost citate \u00een material;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Partidele de opozi\u021bie \u0219i unii politicieni (Maia Sandu) au fost viza\u021bi\/acuza\u021bi direct de premierul Ion Chicu, dar acestora nu li s-a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire tematic\u0103<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=jETPaM8nqpY\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Aceasta a avut un timp de emisie de 6 minute \u0219i 45 secunde. Canalul a prezentat informa\u021bia tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103 \u0219i a admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/jETPaM8nqpY\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Estompare.<\/strong> <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a estompat informa\u021bia privind mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 prin faptul c\u0103 a scos \u00een prim-plan elementele de scandal din Parlament (discu\u021biile \u00een contradictoriu dintre deputa\u021bii Dumitru Diacov \u0219i Marina Tauber) \u0219i a pus accentul pe raportul \u0219i performan\u021bele Guvernului, contabilizate de premierul Ion Chicu. Televiziunea a omis detaliile mo\u021biunii propriu-zise, precum \u0219i opinia opozi\u021biei pe marginea acesteia;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eHaos \u00een Parlament\u201d; \u201eTentative de boicot \u00een Parlament\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eOpozi\u021bia a creat haos \u00een Parlament, prin huiduieli \u0219i comportament inadecvat\u201d; \u201e\u0218edin\u021b\u0103 cu show politic ast\u0103zi \u00een Parlament. Exerci\u021biul de examinare a mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu s-a transformat \u00eentr-o ceart\u0103 ca la u\u0219a cortului&#8230;\u201d; \u201eSup\u0103r\u0103rile au \u00eenceput de la frac\u021biunea \u0218or&#8230;\u201d; \u201eSup\u0103r\u0103rile opozi\u021biei au ajuns la cote maxime, iar \u00een sala de \u0219edin\u021be spiritele s-au \u00eencins&#8230;\u201d; \u201eRaportul premierului nu i-a interesat pe autorii mo\u021biunii, care au lipsit \u00een mare parte din sal\u0103&#8230;\u201d; \u201eDeclara\u021biile premierului au fost confirmate indirect de deputa\u021bii din opozi\u021bie&#8230;\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Tehnica du\u0219manului intern\/Tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Pe de o parte, opozi\u021bia au fost prezentat\u0103 \u00eentr-un context negativ, fiind \u00eenvinuit\u0103 de problemele cu care se confrunt\u0103 Republica Moldova. Pe de alt\u0103 parte, Cabinetul Chicu a fost prezentat \u00een context pozitiv, drept guvernul care a reu\u0219it s\u0103 fac\u0103 doar lucruri bune pentru cet\u0103\u021benii \u021b\u0103rii.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Partidele de opozi\u021bie \u0219i unii politicieni (Maia Sandu) au fost viza\u021bi\/acuza\u021bi direct de premierul Ion Chicu, f\u0103r\u0103 a le fi fost acordat dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Etichetare:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eMo\u021biunea a fost semnat\u0103 de deputa\u021bii PPDA \u0219i PAS \u0219i sus\u021binut\u0103 de Partidul \u0218or \u0219i grupul Candu\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen cazul <\/span><strong>Accent TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> au fost monitorizate 2 \u0219tiri difuzate pe post (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/haos-in-parlament\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Haos \u00een Parlament<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u0219i<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/greceanii-opozitia-vrea-haos\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Grecean\u00eei: opozi\u021bia vrea haos<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) \u0219i 4 materiale publicate pe pagina web a televiziunii. Redac\u021bia a reflectat informa\u021bia tenden\u021bios \u0219i dezechilibrat, recurg\u00e2nd la acela\u0219i scenariu, imagini \u0219i text ca \u0219i <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u0219i <\/span><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>Accent TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/zurIa1I8a6Q?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii:<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/opozitia-a-suferit-un-esec-usturator-motiunea-de-cenzura-a-picat-iar-guvernul-chicu-a-ramas-sa-conduca-moldova\/\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eOpozi\u021bia a suferit un e\u0219ec ustur\u0103tor! Mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 a picat, iar Guvernul Chicu a r\u0103mas s\u0103 conduc\u0103 Moldova\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Partidele de opozi\u021bie \u0219i unii politicieni au fost viza\u021bi \u0219i acuza\u021bi direct de premierul Ion Chicu, pre\u0219edintele Igor Dodon \u0219i deputa\u021bii sociali\u0219ti Vlad Batr\u00eencea \u0219i Vladimir Golovatiuc, \u00eens\u0103 celor dint\u00e2i nu li s-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103 \u00een niciunul dintre cazuri;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Etichet\u0103ri:<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/opozitia-a-suferit-un-esec-usturator-motiunea-de-cenzura-a-picat-iar-guvernul-chicu-a-ramas-sa-conduca-moldova\/\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eDeputa\u021bii PAS, PPDA, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu grupul Candu \u0219i PP \u0218or au scandat lozinci, au \u021bipat, au b\u0103tut cu pumnii \u00een mas\u0103 \u0219i au fluierat \u00een timp ce \u0219eful Guvernului a prezentat raportul de activitate\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/a-tv.md\/vladimir-golovatiuc-marele-merit-al-guvernului-condus-de-ion-chicu-este-faptul-ca-a-reusit-sa-pastreze-integritatea-si-stabilitatea-tarii\/\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e&#8230; sus\u021binut\u0103 de grupurile Candu \u0219i \u0218or\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Tehnica du\u0219manului intern\/Tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Pe de o parte, opozi\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103 \u00eentr-un context negativ; pe de alt\u0103 parte, Guvernul Chicu a fost pus \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/6j36bvd8MFg?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Moldova 1<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a reflectat subiectul mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-20-iulie-2020\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een \u201eMesager\u201d-ul din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Televiziunea public\u0103 a difuzat o \u0219tire de la \u0219edin\u021ba Parlamentului \u0219i o transmisiune live din fa\u021ba Legislativului, de la protestul veteranilor, ambele cu un timp de emisie total de 10 minute \u0219i 40 de secunde. Televiziunea public\u0103 a admis c\u00e2teva abateri deontologice:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eDezbaterile nu au trecut f\u0103r\u0103 replici acide \u0219i haos&#8230; \u201d; \u201e&#8230;de aici \u0219i p\u00e2n\u0103 la haos a fost un mic pas&#8230;\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Selectarea p\u0103rtinitoarea a declara\u021biilor<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Jurnali\u0219tii au inclus \u00een \u0219tire declara\u021bii ale premierului Ion Chicu, \u00een timp ce \u00een cazul partidelor de opozi\u021bie au fost inserate doar \u00eentreb\u0103ri acordate premierului, nu \u0219i declara\u021bii directe din lu\u0103rile lor de cuv\u00e2nt pe marginea mo\u021biunii.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rtr.md\/vesti-moldova\/102190215\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire de 4 minute \u0219i 6 secunde la subiectul monitorizat. <\/span><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a prezentat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a admite careva abateri deontologice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat 3 \u0219tiri la subiect,<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/primelestiri.md\/ro\/primele-stiri-20-iulie-2020-21-00---100305.html\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Cu un total de emisie de 9 minute \u0219i jum\u0103tate, acestea s-au referit la mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 propriu-zis \u0219i dezbaterile din Parlament; protestul organizat \u00een fa\u021ba Legislativului; limitarea accesului reprezentan\u021bilor mass-media \u00een sala de plen. <\/span><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a reflectat neutru \u0219i echidistant informa\u021bia, oferind timp de emisie \u0219i asigur\u00e2nd dreptul la opinie tuturor celor implica\u021bi sau viza\u021bi. Totu\u0219i, a fost identificat un caz de amestec al faptelor cu opinii: <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e\u00centre timp, a fost ast\u0103zi circ la Parlament. Examinarea mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu a \u00eencins spiritele la maximum\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/primelestiri.md\/embed\/100305.html\" width=\"600\" height=\"358\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Redac\u021bia <\/span><strong>Publika TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat pe post \u0219i publicat pe site 16 \u0219tiri\/materiale cu referin\u021b\u0103 la mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu (dezbaterile \u00een plenul parlamentului, opiniile frac\u021biunilor parlamentare \u0219i ale pre\u0219edintelui \u021b\u0103rii, protestul din fa\u021ba Legislativului, anun\u021barea \u0219i organizarea \u0219edin\u021bei Legislativului \u00een ziua de luni, limitarea accesului presei \u00een Parlament). \u00cen cazul \u0219tirilor \u00een format video, <\/span><strong>Publika TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a recurs la acela\u0219i scenariu, folosind acela\u0219i text \u0219i imagini ca <\/span><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>Publika TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis urm\u0103toarele abateri deontologice:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/fractiunea-parlamentara-a-partidului-sor-insista-sa-participe-la-sedinta-legislativului_3080146.html\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Doi deputa\u021bi ai Partidului \u0218or au fost viza\u021bi \u0219i acuza\u021bi de sursa unei \u0219tiri (Nicolae Furtun\u0103) c\u0103 s-ar fi infectat de coronavirus <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201ela OrheiLand\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Celor din urm\u0103 nu li s-a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/o-noua-sedinta-un-nou-circ-deputatii-la-un-pas-de-bataie_3080161.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eO nou\u0103 \u0219edin\u021b\u0103, un nou circ. Deputa\u021bii, LA UN PAS de B\u0102TAIE\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/-show-la-parlament-diacov-marina-tu-ai-baut-medicamente-contra-covid-19-sau-de-temperatura_3080159.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eSHOW la Parlament. Diacov: Marina, tu ai b\u0103ut medicamente contra COVID-19 sau de temperatur\u0103?\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/haos-total-in-parlament-fluieraturi-si-imbranceli-in-cladirea-legislativului_3080170.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eHAOS TOTAL \u00een Parlament! Fluier\u0103turi \u015fi \u00eembr\u00e2nceli \u00een cl\u0103direa Legislativului\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/circ-la-parlament-agentii-de-paza-s-au-imbrancit-cu-jurnalistii-si-deputatii-iar-o-usa-din-sediul-legislativului-a-fost-sparta_3080196.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eCirc \u0219i haos \u00een Parlament\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/-show-la-parlament-diacov-marina-tu-ai-baut-medicamente-contra-covid-19-sau-de-temperatura_3080159.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eShow la Parlament. Deputa\u021bii Marina Tauber \u015fi Dumitru Diacov au fost protagoni\u0219tii unui schimb de replici amuzante \u00een debutul \u0219edin\u021bei de ast\u0103zi\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/reactia-zinaidei-greceanii-privind-haosul-de-la-sedinta-de-astazi-a-parlamentului_3080175.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eExaminarea mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu s-a transformat \u00eentr-un adev\u0103rat haos\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu-a-picat_3080194.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eIon Chicu nu a ezitat s\u0103 arunce s\u0103ge\u021bi spre opozi\u021bie\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a deschis<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/bc6ec32756f5590f\/jurnalul-orei-19-20-iulie.html\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">buletinul informativ din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> cu un reportaj despre subiectul monitorizat. \u00cen cele 7 minute, <\/span><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a reflectat neutru informa\u021bia despre mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u0219i dezbaterile din acea zi. Totu\u0219i, <\/span><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a pus accentul pe declara\u021biile reprezentan\u021bilor PPDA (Maria Ciobanu, Andrei N\u0103stase), \u00een defavoarea premierului Ion Chicu, citat direct cu\u00a0 c\u00e2teva declara\u021bii scurte. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, <\/span><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis \u0219i un caz de <\/span><strong>amestec al faptelor \u0219i opiniilor<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eDe notat c\u0103, la ultima \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 a Parlamentului, de joi, cei doi deputa\u021bi ai Partidului \u0218or nu aveau masc\u0103 de protec\u021bie. Nu aveau masc\u0103 \u0219i unii deputa\u021bi ai PD. Chiar \u0219i a\u0219a, conducerea Parlamentului, asigurat\u0103 de PSRM-PD, s-a gr\u0103bit s\u0103 anun\u021be \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 plenar\u0103 pentru ast\u0103zi\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/embed\/bc6ec32756f5590f\" width=\"650\" height=\"370\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat 3 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat,<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=_AFjZsEs4rQ\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 20 iulie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Cu un total de emisie de aproape 12 minute, <\/span><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis \u00een \u0219tirile difuzate:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e\u00cen ap\u0103rarea lui Ion Chicu au venit sociali\u0219tii care s-au n\u0103pustit asupra opozi\u021biei pentru a-i \u00eempiedica s\u0103 protesteze&#8230; \u201d; \u201eHaosul din plenul Parlamentului s-a extins \u0219i pe holul institu\u021biei\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">; <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eDeputa\u021bii au luptat \u00eempreun\u0103 cu jurnali\u0219tii pentru a primi acces \u00een Parlament\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (inclusiv <\/span><strong>generalizare<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">);\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Selectarea p\u0103rtinitoare \u0219i dispropor\u021bionat\u0103 a declara\u021biilor<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Premierul Ion Chicu a fost citat direct cu declara\u021bii generale \u0219i pu\u021bin relevante subiectului mo\u021biunii, \u00een timp ce reprezentan\u021bilor partidelor de opozi\u021bie li s-a oferit un timp generos de emisie, cu declara\u021bii desf\u0103\u0219urate;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Igor Dodon a fost acuzat de unele surse ale \u0219tirii, dar acestuia nu i s-a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/_AFjZsEs4rQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat 11 \u0219tiri la subiect, pe 20 iulie 2020, toate referindu-se la aspecte ce au vizat mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului <img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-14012 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/1-1024x545.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"564\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/1-1024x545.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/1-350x186.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/1.jpg 1240w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 564px) 100vw, 564px\" \/>Chicu. <\/span><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20200720\/30998654\/Marina-Tauber-a-fost-avertizatA-cA-va-fi-exclusA-de-la-Sedina-Parlamentului--Iata-de-ce-.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eDeputata din partea frac\u021biunii Partidului \u0218OR Marina Tauber s-a dat \u00een spectacol la \u00eenceputul \u0219edin\u021bei Parlamentului de ast\u0103zi\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00cen<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/society\/20200720\/30992077\/Parlamentul-va-decide-astazi-soarta-Guvernului-Chicu-Iata-ce-urmeaza.html\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">una din \u0219tiri<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a men\u021bionat despre declara\u021biile lui Igor Dodon, potrivit c\u0103rora <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e&#8230;tentativele de a demite Guvernul, dup\u0103 ce acesta a adoptat decizii importante pentru cet\u0103\u021beni, arat\u0103 mai cur\u00e2nd fie ca o aventur\u0103 a partidelor din fostul bloc ACUM, fie ca o \u00een\u021belegere cu for\u021bele oligarhice, care vor s\u0103-\u0219i restabileasc\u0103 controlul asupra institu\u021biilor de stat\u201d <\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(inclusiv, <\/span><strong>amestecul faptelor cu opinii<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">). Redac\u021bia nu a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103 reprezentan\u021bilor PAS \u0219i PPDA, acestea fiind acuzate\/vizate \u00een declara\u021bia \u0219efului statului.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Pe 20 iunie 2020, <\/span><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat 13 \u0219tiri la subiectul mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu. Redac\u021bia a admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/c49f4eb739667824\/video-scandal-in-parlament-pentru-accesul-presei-in-sala-vreti-sa-facem-centru-covid-aici-nu-suntem-la-piata.html\"> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eAccesul presei \u00een sala de \u0219edin\u021be s-a votat dup\u0103 minute \u00een \u0219ir de scandal \u0219i haos \u00een Legislativ\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/2f5d1d654f084bed\/igor-dodon-dupa-ce-motiunea-a-cazut-in-plen-sper-ca-maia-sandu-si-andrei-nastase-au-inteles-ca-nu-a-meritat-sa-si-puna-semnaturile-la-un-loc-cu-gruparile-mafiote.html\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">opinia pre\u0219edintelui Igor Dodon<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u0219i<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/4c8eb390f00398e4\/ion-terguta-astazi-politicienii-au-fost-din-nou-pitici.html\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a secretarului PPDA, Ion Tergu\u021b\u0103<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, pe marginea respingerii mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103. Primul a acuzat grupul parlamentar Pro-Moldova \u0219i Partidul \u0218or, precum \u0219i c\u00e2\u021biva politicieni (Maia Sandu \u0219i Andrei N\u0103stase); al doilea l-a vizat pe pre\u0219edintele Igor Dodon \u00een declara\u021bia sa. \u00cen niciunul dintre cazuri, celor viza\u021bi\/acuza\u021bi nu li s-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-14013 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"383\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/2.jpg 551w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/2-267x350.jpg 267w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 383px) 100vw, 383px\" \/>Kp.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat, pe 20 iulie 2020, 6 materiale cu referin\u021b\u0103 la mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu. <\/span><strong>Kp.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, pun\u00e2nd \u00een lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103 partidele de opozi\u021bie, iar \u00een lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103 &#8211; Executivul \u0219i partidele de guvern\u0103m\u00e2nt. Jurnali\u0219tii au admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor \u0219i opiniilor:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e\u00cen timpul discursului premierului Chicu \u00een Parlament (apropo, printre altele s-a discutat \u0219i despre mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u2013 <\/span><\/em><strong><em>ironie<\/em><\/strong><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">), opozi\u021bia s-a sup\u0103rat pentru <\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00ab<\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">atacul<\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00bb<\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> acestuia \u00een adresa Maiei Sandu \u0219i a organizat un bardac cu strig\u0103te, \u021bipete \u0219i trop\u0103ieli\u201d (orig. \u201e\u0412\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044c\u0435\u0440-\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430 \u041a\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u0432 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0435 (\u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0441\u044f\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0439, \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0441\u044f \u0432\u043e\u0442\u0443\u043c \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044c\u0435\u0440\u0443) \u043e\u043f\u043f\u043e\u0437\u0438\u0446\u0438\u044f \u043e\u0431\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0441\u044c \u0437\u0430 <\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00ab<\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0437\u0434<\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00bb<\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u043d\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u044e \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443. \u0418 &#8211; \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0440\u0434\u0430\u043a. \u0421 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u0432\u043e\u043f\u043b\u044f\u043c\u0438, \u0442\u043e\u043f\u0430\u043d\u044c\u0435\u043c\u201d)<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Etichet\u0103ri:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eParlamentul analizeaz\u0103 ast\u0103zi mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eenaintat\u0103 de Platforma DA, PAS \u0219i sus\u021binut\u0103 de grup\u0103rile Candu \u0219i \u0218or, aflate sub controlul oligarhului Vladimir Plahotniuc\u201d (orig. \u201e\u041f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u0441\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044f \u0432\u043e\u0442\u0443\u043c \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u044f, \u0432\u044b\u0434\u0432\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\u0439 \u0444\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u00ab\u041f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u044b \u0414\u0410\u00bb \u0438 \u041f\u0414\u0421 \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0433\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u041a\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443 \u0438 \u0428\u043e\u0440\u0430, \u043d\u0430\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044f\u0449\u0438\u0445\u0441\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043c \u043e\u043b\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0445\u0430 \u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u041f\u043b\u0430\u0445\u043e\u0442\u043d\u044e\u043a\u0430\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00cen una din \u0219tiri, deputatul PSRM Vasile Bolea a acuzat partidele de opozi\u021bie: <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eAlian\u021ba haosului Sandu-Candu-Plaha-\u0218or a transformat Parlamentul \u00een teritoriu pentru ap\u0103rarea aeroportului. Ei ap\u0103r\u0103 cu pumnii \u0219i cu din\u021bii miliardele furate de oligarhi\u201d\u00a0 (orig. \u201e\u0410\u043b\u044c\u044f\u043d\u0441 \u0445\u0430\u043e\u0441\u0430 \u0421\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443-\u041a\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443-\u041f\u043b\u0430\u0445\u0430-\u0428\u043e\u0440 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u0432 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u0440\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044e \u043f\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0430\u044d\u0440\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430. \u0417\u0443\u0431\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0438 \u043a\u0443\u043b\u0430\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u043e\u043d\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0449\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u043c\u0438\u043b\u043b\u0438\u0430\u0440\u0434\u044b, \u0443\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u043b\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0445\u0430\u043c\u0438\u201d)<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>Kp.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> nu a oferit \u00eens\u0103 dreptul la replic\u0103 celor viza\u021bi;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e\u00cen Parlament domne\u0219te haosul \u2013 au loc \u0219i b\u0103t\u0103i: deputa\u021bii din opozi\u021bie au f\u0103cut circ \u00een momentul discursului premierului \u2013 al\u021bii au mers s\u0103 \u00eei calmeze\u201d (orig. \u201e\u0412 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0435 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b \u0445\u0430\u043e\u0441 &#8211; \u0442\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u043e\u0448\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0430: \u0414\u0435\u043f\u0443\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044b \u043e\u0442 \u043e\u043f\u043f\u043e\u0437\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0448\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0442\u043e \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044c\u0435\u0440-\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430 &#8211; \u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0448\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u201d)<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eAnali\u0219tii politici men\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 a coincis cu decizia Guvernului Chicu de a anula contractul de concesionare a aeroportului\u201d (orig. \u201e\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0437\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0442, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u044b\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u0442\u0443\u043c\u0430 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0441\u043e\u0432\u043f\u0430\u043b\u043e \u0441 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u0430\u0431\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430 \u041a\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u0440\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0434\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440 \u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0438 \u0430\u044d\u0440\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430\u201d)<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Trimiterea la surse imposibil de verificat:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eCum au prev\u0103zut unii anali\u0219ti politici la \u00eenceputul \u0219edin\u021bei Parlamentului, opozi\u021bia nu a g\u0103sit voturile necesare\u201d (orig. \u201e\u041a\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0430\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0432 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e\u043c \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430, \u0443 \u043e\u043f\u043f\u043e\u0437\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0448\u043b\u043e\u0441\u044c \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u044b\u0445 \u0433\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432\u201d)<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>La 14 iulie 2020, PPDA a semnat o mo\u021biune de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu. La 16 iulie 2020, deputatul PPDA Alexandru Slusari a citit textul mo\u021biunii \u00een plenul Parlamentului, solicit\u00e2nd deputa\u021bilor PAS s\u0103 le urmeze exemplul \u0219i s\u0103 sus\u021bin\u0103 mo\u021biunea. \u00cen aceea\u0219i zi, documentul a fost transmis Comisiei juridice, iar potrivit legii, \u00een urm\u0103toarele dou\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni, Parlamentul era obligat s\u0103 dezbat\u0103 mo\u021biunea \u00eentr-o sesiune extraordinar\u0103. Ulterior, PAS a anun\u021bat c\u0103 va sus\u021bine mo\u021biunea \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu, la fel \u0219i deputatul neafiliat Octavian \u021a\u00eecu. La scurt timp, \u0219i grupul parlamentar Pro-Moldova, precum \u0219i Partidul \u0218or au anun\u021bat c\u0103 vor sus\u021bine mo\u021biunea \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u00cen diminea\u021ba zilei de 20 iulie 2020, Biroul permanent al Parlamentului a decis examinarea mo\u021biunii de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului \u00een aceea\u0219i zi. \u0218edin\u021ba legislativului a \u00eenceput la ora 14.00, iar dup\u0103 mai mult de patru ore de dezbateri, mo\u021biunea a fost respins\u0103. Pentru demiterea Cabinetului de mini\u0219tri au votat 46 de deputa\u021bi ai PPDA, PAS, grupului parlamentar Pro-Moldova \u0219i ai frac\u021biunii Partidului \u0218or. Mo\u021biunea nu a fost sus\u021binut\u0103 de deputa\u021bii PSRM \u0219i PDM, iar deputatul independent Alexandru Oleinic s-a ab\u021binut de la vot.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong><em>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>__________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Realizarea acestui articol a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului american \u0219i poporului britanic prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite.<\/em><\/p>\n<h5><em><strong>Sursa foto: Parlament.md<\/strong><\/em><\/h5>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subiectul privind mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu \u0219i dezbaterile din 20 iulie din cadrul Legislativului a fost reflectat de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Fiecare a abordat \u00eens\u0103 diferit informa\u021bia, \u00een mare parte prin prisma preferin\u021belor politice. NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova, Sputnik.md \u0219i Kp.md au favorizat \u0219i au prezentat \u00eentr-o<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":14015,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. \u201eCirc\u201d \u0219i \u201ehaos\u201d: cum au relatat 12 institu\u021bii de pres\u0103 despre mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Subiectul privind mo\u021biunea de cenzur\u0103 \u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu \u0219i dezbaterile din 20 iulie din cadrul Legislativului a fost reflectat de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Fiecare a abordat \u00eens\u0103 diferit informa\u021bia, \u00een mare parte prin prisma preferin\u021belor politice. NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova, Sputnik.md \u0219i Kp.md au favorizat \u0219i au prezentat \u00eentr-oMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-28T05:48:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-04T14:09:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/cover-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/cover-2.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. \\u201eCirc\\u201d \\u0219i \\u201ehaos\\u201d: cum au relatat 12 institu\\u021bii de pres\\u0103 despre mo\\u021biunea de cenzur\\u0103 \\u00eempotriva Guvernului Chicu - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-28T05:48:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-04T14:09:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/a165a1637d65d9e62c0fa2394a7fd62e\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-circ-si-haos-cum-au-relatat-12-institutii-de-presa-despre-motiunea-de-cenzura-impotriva-guvernului-chicu\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/a165a1637d65d9e62c0fa2394a7fd62e\",\"name\":\"czavatin@gmail.com\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14009"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14009"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14117,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14009\/revisions\/14117"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}