{"id":13666,"date":"2020-06-17T09:00:50","date_gmt":"2020-06-17T09:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=13666"},"modified":"2020-06-24T19:00:36","modified_gmt":"2020-06-24T19:00:36","slug":"studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Adoptarea declara\u021biei privind condamnarea traseismului politic de c\u0103tre Parlament, reflectat\u0103 \u00een media prin prisma preferin\u021belor politice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong><em>Subiectul adopt\u0103rii de c\u0103tre Legislativ a unei declara\u021bii de condamnare a faptelor de traseism \u0219i corupere politic\u0103 a fost <img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-13080 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/img-studii-de-caz.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"472\" height=\"395\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/img-studii-de-caz.png 940w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/img-studii-de-caz-350x293.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 472px) 100vw, 472px\" \/>abordat \u00een \u0219tiri de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Unele au oferit un timp de emisie mai mare acestui subiect, \u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 prezinte \u00een detalii documentul adoptat (Jurnal TV, Moldova 1, Primul \u00een Moldova). Altele, dimpotriv\u0103, au \u00eencercat s\u0103 estompeze acest subiect printr-o prezentare general\u0103 \u0219i subiectiv\u0103 (Prime TV, Publika TV). Abaterea deontologic\u0103 admis\u0103 cel mai des a fost lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103 (NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova, Kp.md), urmat\u0103 de selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 \u0219i dezechilibrat\u0103 a surselor \u0219i declara\u021biilor (NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova), cazuri de etichet\u0103ri (Primul \u00een Moldova, Unimedia.info), sugestii (Sputnik.md) \u0219i amestec al faptelor cu opinii (Jurnal TV, Unimedia.info). <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a deschis<a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/34111\"> <span class=\"s2\">buletinul informativ din 11 iunie 2020<\/span><\/a> cu o \u0219tire de 4 minute despre declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 \u00een Parlament. Postul a prezentat subiectul selectiv, favoriz\u00e2nd Partidul Sociali\u0219tilor (PSRM) \u0219i Partidul Democrat (PDM), precum \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestor partide. Totodat\u0103, <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a prezentat \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103 exponen\u021bii grupului parlamentar Pro-Moldova. <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a mai admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li class=\"li3\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 \u0219i dezechilibrat\u0103 a declara\u021biilor\/surselor<\/strong>. <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> a inclus doar declara\u021bii directe ale reprezentan\u021bilor PSRM \u0219i PDM; <\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li5\"><span class=\"s5\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s1\">. Andrian Candu a fost vizat\/acuzat de sursele \u0219tirii, dar acestuia nu<\/span><span class=\"s5\"> i s-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ElNOYN8Sc4k?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s6\"><a href=\"http:\/\/a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=82812\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 11 iunie 2020<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s1\">, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri cu un total de emisie de aproximativ 3 minute. Prima din ele a fost o prezentare general\u0103 a documentului, f\u0103r\u0103 a include surse \u0219i\/sau declara\u021bii directe. Postul de televiziune a \u021binut s\u0103 sublinieze c\u0103 declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 de Parlament este o ini\u021biativ\u0103 venit\u0103 din partea coali\u021biei majoritare PSRM-PDM. Totodat\u0103, \u00een background, autorii l-au<\/span><span class=\"s3\"> men\u021bionat pe pre\u0219edintele Igor Dodon \u0219i au insistat c\u0103 <\/span><span class=\"s1\">el ar fi propus anterior de mai multe ori \u0219i a sus\u021binut o astfel de ini\u021biativ\u0103 (<\/span><span class=\"s3\"><strong>tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional\/Mesia<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s1\">). Astfel, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> l-a prezentat \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103 pe pre\u0219edintele statului, PSRM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid. A doua \u0219tire a fost f\u0103cut\u0103 \u00een baza unei singure declara\u021bii a deputatului socialist Grigore Novac, astfel fiind favorizat\u0103 forma\u021biunea din care face parte (<strong>selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a declara\u021biilor<\/strong>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe style=\"border: none; overflow: hidden;\" src=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/plugins\/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FAccentTVMoldova%2Fvideos%2F604673423499533%2F&amp;show_text=0&amp;width=560\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> difuzat o \u0219tire la subiectul<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=vy6WDe7gtMg\"> <span class=\"s7\">monitorizat, \u00een buletinul informativ din 11 iunie 2020<\/span><\/a>. \u0218tirea, cu un total de emisie de 4 minute \u0219i 28 de secunde, a avut aproximativ acela\u0219i scenariu, text \u0219i imagini video ca \u0219i cea de la <\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> (unica excep\u021bie fiind includerea unei scurte declara\u021bii directe, de 5 secunde, din partea lui Alexandru Slusari, deputat al Partidului Platforma Demnitate \u0219i Adev\u0103r). <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103. Acest post de televiziune a admis: <\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li class=\"li3\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Etichetarea:<\/strong> <\/span><span class=\"s3\"><em>\u201e&#8230; liderul PDM, Pavel Filip, a adus exemplul pentru frac\u021biunea care o conduce, <\/em><\/span><span class=\"s1\"><em>rupt\u0103 de fostul democrat Andrian Candu \u0219i condamnatul fugar Ilan \u0218or\u201d<\/em>; <\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li3\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> Andrian Candu \u0219i grupul parlamentar Pro-Moldova au fost acuza\u021bi direct de unele surse ale \u0219tirii, dar<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>acestora nu li s-a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103;<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li3\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Selectarea tenden\u021bioas\u0103 \u0219i neechilibrat\u0103 a declara\u021biilor\/surselor.<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> Reprezentan\u021bii PSRM \u0219i PDM au beneficiat de mai multe interven\u021bii directe \u00een \u0219tire, \u00een <\/span><span class=\"s1\">timp ce<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>opiniile celorlalte partide pe marginea subiectului nu au fost incluse, cu excep\u021bia unei scurte<\/span><span class=\"s3\"> declara\u021bii <\/span><span class=\"s1\">a lui Alexandru Slusari;<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li5\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional\/Mesia<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s5\">. <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s1\"> l-a prezentat pe Igor Dodon drept persoana care, anterior, a venit cu ini\u021biativa acestei declara\u021bii, <\/span><span class=\"s5\">pun\u00e2ndu-l astfel \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a difuzat<a href=\"https:\/\/rtr.md\/vesti-moldova\/102185359\/\"> <span class=\"s2\">o \u0219tire<\/span><\/a> \u2013 cu un total de emisie de aproximativ 3 minute \u0219i 30 secunde \u2013 \u00een care a men\u021bionat despre mai multe ini\u021biative discutate \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din 11 iunie a Parlamentului, inclusiv cea privind adoptarea declara\u021biei. Postul TV s-a referit la faptul c\u0103 documentul a fost discutat \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba legislativului \u0219i a fost aprobat unanim de deputa\u021bi. <strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a admite abateri deontologice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s6\"><a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-11-iunie-2020\">\u00cen \u201eMesager\u201d-ul din 11 iunie 2020<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s1\">, <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a difuzat o \u0219tire \u2013 cu un timp de emisie de 4 minute \u0219i 20 de secunde \u2013 despre declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 de Parlament, prin care institu\u021bia a condamnat traseismul politic. Televiziunea public\u0103 a prezentat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant, incluz\u00e2nd declara\u021bii ale tuturor frac\u021biunilor parlamentare pe marginea subiectului discutat. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> a reflectat informa\u021bia despre subiectul monitorizat <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=T3cJbLd339Y\"><span class=\"s7\">\u00een buletinul din 11 iunie 2020<\/span><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s1\">, \u00eentr-o \u0219tire de 4 minute \u0219i 10 secunde, \u00een care s-a referit la mai multe ini\u021biative dezb\u0103tute \u00een plenul Parlamentului. <strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> a prezentat \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103 PDM-ul \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestei forma\u021biuni. Aceast\u0103 institu\u021bie media a admis \u0219i un caz de <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opinii<\/strong>: <em>\u201eDeputa\u021bii s-au luat la har\u021b\u0103&#8230; \u201d<\/em>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/T3cJbLd339Y?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/primelestiri.md\/ro\/primele-stiri-11-iunie-2020-21-00---99135.html\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 11 iunie 2020<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s1\">, <strong>Prime TV<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire la subiectul monitorizat, cu un total de emisie de 45 secunde. Jurnali\u0219tii de la <\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> au men\u021bionat la general despre declara\u021bia <\/span><span class=\"s1\">adoptat\u0103 de Parlament, dar nu au inclus nicio surs\u0103 direct\u0103, \u0219i respectiv nu au amintit despre discu\u021biile \u00een contradictoriu din cadrul \u0219edin\u021bei parlamentare pe marginea acestui subiect. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a publicat<a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/deputatii-au-aprobat-in-unanimitate-declaratia-cu-privire-la-condamnarea-faptelor-de-traseism-si-corupere-politica_3077165.html\"> <span class=\"s2\">o \u0219tire<\/span><\/a> pe platforma sa online, \u00een care a f\u0103cut o prezentare general\u0103 a declara\u021biei, f\u0103r\u0103 a include surse cu declara\u021bii directe. <strong>Publika TV,<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\">\u00a0ca \u0219i\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Prime TV,<\/strong> a estompat subiectul privind declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 de Parlament prin care a condamnat traseismul politic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a difuzat<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/4650f4fd01bdd864\/jurnalul-orei-19-11-iunie.html\"> <span class=\"s2\">o \u0219tire<\/span><\/a> de aproape 6 minute la subiectul monitorizat. Informa\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103 detaliat, fiind incluse mai multe surse directe care s-au expus pe marginea ini\u021biativei. <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> a admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li class=\"li3\"><span class=\"s3\"><strong>Amestec al faptelor \u0219i opiniilor<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s1\">: <em>\u201eIni\u021biativa apar\u021bine PDM \u0219i acest lucru i-a surprins pe unii deputa\u021bi din actuala opozi\u021bie. Ace\u0219tia au remarcat c\u0103 printre autorii proiectului sunt unii care s-au plimbat anterior pe la mai multe partide\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201eo rund\u0103 de replici acide\u201d<\/em>;<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"li3\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> C\u00e2teva surse ale \u0219tirii (Lilian Carp, PAS; Denis Ulanov, Partidul \u0218or; Alexandru Slusari, PPDA) au adus acuza\u021bii anumitor politicieni (Marian Lupu, Viorica Abramciuc, Igor Dodon, Ion Ceban) \u00een declara\u021biile lor, iar acestora nu li s-a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/embed\/4650f4fd01bdd864\" width=\"650\" height=\"370\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\">Pe 11 iunie 2020, <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a publicat 2 \u0219tiri despre declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 de Parlament, prin care a fost condamnat traseismul politic.<a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/312f560b7cca8816\/transfugii-din-pro-moldova-nu-sunt-de-acord-cu-plecarea-deputatilor-dintr-un-partid-in-altul-cu-votul-acestora-declaratia-cu-privire-la-condamnarea-faptelor-de-traseism-si-corupere-politica-votata-in-parlament.html\"> <span class=\"s2\">\u00cen<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>una din ele<\/span><\/a>, <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a f\u0103cut o prezentare general\u0103 a declara\u021biei, iar<a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/0422763c89919823\/video-declaratiile-lui-candu-care-au-enervat-o-pe-babuc-si-replica-acesteia-din-sfanta-scriptura-pavel-filip-plecarile-din-pd-au-fost-pe-rand-pentru-ca-ofertele-erau-in-crestere.html\"> <span class=\"s2\">a doua \u0219tire<\/span><\/a> a inclus d<\/span><span class=\"s3\">eclara\u021biile deputa\u021bilor Monica Babuc, Pavel Filip \u0219i Andrian Candu cu accent pe conflictul dintre frac\u021biunile parlamentare ale c\u0103ror exponen\u021bi sunt. Ambele titluri ale \u0219tirilor au fost tenden\u021bioase \u0219i au inclus \u00een sine at\u00e2t <\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>etichet\u0103ri<\/strong>,<\/span><span class=\"s3\"> c\u00e2t \u0219i <strong>amestec de fapte \u0219i opinii<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s1\">: <em>\u201e<\/em><\/span><span class=\"s9\"><em>\u00ab<\/em><\/span><span class=\"s1\"><em>Transfugii<\/em><\/span><span class=\"s9\"><em>\u00bb<\/em><\/span><span class=\"s1\"><em> din Pro-Moldova nu sunt de acord cu plecarea deputa\u021bilor dintr-un partid \u00een altul: Cu votul acestora, Declara\u021bia cu privire la condamnarea faptelor de traseism \u0219i corupere politic\u0103, votat\u0103 \u00een Parlament\u201d; \u201eDeclara\u021biile lui Candu care au enervat-o pe Babuc \u0219i replica acesteia din Sf\u00e2nta Scriptur\u0103. Pavel Filip: Plec\u0103rile din PD au fost pe r\u00e2nd, pentru c\u0103 ofertele erau \u00een cre\u0219tere\u201d<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a publicat<a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20200611\/30540592\/Faptele-traseism-corupere-politica.html\"> <span class=\"s2\">o \u0219tire<\/span><\/a> la subiectul monitorizat. Articolul s-a referit la aspectele principale ale documentului adoptat \u00een Legislativ, o<img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-13673 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/sputnik-1024x561.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"568\" height=\"311\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/sputnik-1024x561.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/sputnik-350x192.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/sputnik.jpg 1246w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 568px) 100vw, 568px\" \/> declara\u021bie direct\u0103 a democratului\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"s1\">Alexandru Jizdan, care este autor al documentului, <\/span><span class=\"s3\">\u0219i c\u00e2teva detalii de context, implicit <\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>sugestia<\/strong> potrivit c\u0103reia Igor Dodon a fost, de fapt, cel care a sugerat \u0219i a anticipat aceast\u0103 ini\u021biativ\u0103 (<\/span><span class=\"s3\"><strong>tehnica Salvatorului na\u021bional\/Mesia<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s1\">). <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> a prezentat informa\u021bia folosind \u00een mare parte acela\u0219i scenariu ca \u0219i <\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> \u0219i <\/span><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Accent TV<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a publicat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri cu referin\u021b\u0103 la declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 de parlamentari. Ambele s-au bazat pe interven\u021biile directe din plen ale deputa\u021bilor sociali\u0219ti<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3905640\/\"> <span class=\"s2\">Grigore Novac<\/span><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s3\"> \u0219i<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3905743\/\"> <span class=\"s7\">Corneliu Furculi\u021b\u0103<\/span><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s1\"> (\u0219tirea \u00een cazul celui din urm\u0103 fiind preluat\u0103 de pe <strong>Aif.md<\/strong>). Astfel, <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a pus \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103 \u0219i a favorizat PSRM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid. De asemenea, <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> <strong>nu a asigurat dreptul la replic\u0103<\/strong> celor viza\u021bi \u0219i\/sau acuza\u021bi (Andrian Candu, grupul parlamentar Pro-Moldova) de sursele \u0219tirilor (Corneliu Furculi\u021b\u0103, Grigore Novac). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong><em>La 11 iunie 2020, \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba Parlamentului Republicii Moldova a fost propus\u0103 spre dezbatere \u0219i adoptare o Declara\u021bie ce are drept scop condamnarea faptelor de traseism \u0219i corupere politic\u0103. Ini\u021biativa a fost \u00eenaintat\u0103 de deputa\u021bii din frac\u021biunea PDM. Potrivit textului documentului, deputa\u021bii din Parlamentul Republicii Moldova condamn\u0103 cu vehemen\u021b\u0103 ac\u021biunile de traseism politic \u00een forul legiuitor al \u021b\u0103rii pentru \u00eentreaga perioad\u0103 a parlamentarismului \u021b\u0103rii. Documentul a generat discu\u021bii \u00een contradictoriu, dar a fost p\u00e2n\u0103 la urm\u0103 sus\u021binut de to\u021bi cei prezen\u021bi la \u0219edin\u021b\u0103. Declara\u021bia adoptat\u0103 nu are putere juridic\u0103, fiind mai degrab\u0103 un act simbolic, \u00eentruc\u00e2t mandatul deputa\u021bilor din Parlament, potrivit Constitu\u021biei \u021b\u0103rii, este unul imperativ.<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em><strong>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>_________________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Realizarea acestui articol a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului american \u0219i poporului britanic prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite.<\/em><\/p>\n<h5><em><strong>Sursa foto: Adevarul.md<\/strong><\/em><\/h5>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subiectul adopt\u0103rii de c\u0103tre Legislativ a unei declara\u021bii de condamnare a faptelor de traseism \u0219i corupere politic\u0103 a fost abordat \u00een \u0219tiri de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Unele au oferit un timp de emisie mai mare acestui subiect, \u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 prezinte \u00een detalii documentul adoptat (Jurnal TV, Moldova 1, Primul \u00een Moldova). Altele,<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":13672,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Adoptarea declara\u021biei privind condamnarea traseismului politic de c\u0103tre Parlament, reflectat\u0103 \u00een media prin prisma preferin\u021belor politice - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Subiectul adopt\u0103rii de c\u0103tre Legislativ a unei declara\u021bii de condamnare a faptelor de traseism \u0219i corupere politic\u0103 a fost abordat \u00een \u0219tiri de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Unele au oferit un timp de emisie mai mare acestui subiect, \u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 prezinte \u00een detalii documentul adoptat (Jurnal TV, Moldova 1, Primul \u00een Moldova). Altele,Mai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-17T09:00:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-06-24T19:00:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/cover-studiu-de-caz.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"804\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"490\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/cover-studiu-de-caz.jpg\",\"width\":804,\"height\":490},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Adoptarea declara\\u021biei privind condamnarea traseismului politic de c\\u0103tre Parlament, reflectat\\u0103 \\u00een media prin prisma preferin\\u021belor politice - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-17T09:00:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-24T19:00:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/d4aefe8396c0a64d7eda3cc959523074\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ru\/studiu-de-caz-adoptarea-declaratiei-privind-condamnarea-traseismului-politic-de-catre-parlament-reflectata-media-prin-prisma-preferintelor-politice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/d4aefe8396c0a64d7eda3cc959523074\",\"name\":\"Dodon Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13666"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13666"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13666\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13743,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13666\/revisions\/13743"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}