{"id":12943,"date":"2020-04-24T08:46:13","date_gmt":"2020-04-24T08:46:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=12943"},"modified":"2020-06-22T14:35:40","modified_gmt":"2020-06-22T14:35:40","slug":"studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Decizia CC privind legea de asumare a r\u0103spunderii de c\u0103tre Guvernul Chicu \u0219i mostrele de manipulare din partea presei afiliate PSRM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Republicii Moldova (CC) privind suspendarea Legii Nr. 56 din 2 aprilie 2020, prin<img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-12216 \" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz-350x293.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"401\" height=\"336\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz-350x293.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz.png 940w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 401px) 100vw, 401px\" \/> intermediul c\u0103reia Guvernul Chicu \u0219i-a asumat r\u0103spunderea \u00een fa\u021ba Parlamentului, a fost reflectat\u0103 de toate institu\u021biile monitorizate. Unele<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>s-au folosit de subiect<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>\u00a0ca s\u0103 defavorizeze \u0219i s\u0103 pun\u0103 \u00een<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103 partidele de opozi\u021bie care au depus\u00a0 sesiz\u0103ri la CC, inclusiv prin a nu oferi drept<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>la replic\u0103\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>(NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova, Sputnik.md, Kp.md). Mai mult, aceste institu\u021bii media au prezentat selectiv informa\u021bia \u0219i<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>au recurs la estomparea ei. Totodat\u0103, <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>NTV Moldova, Accent TV \u0219i Primul \u00een Moldova au reflectat subiectul monitorizat \u00eentr-o manier\u0103 dezinformatoare, suger\u00e2nd c\u0103 partidele de opozi\u021bie au solicitat anularea \u00eentregii legi, dar nu doar a unor articole (3) concrete din act.<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>C\u00e2teva<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>redac\u021bii<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>au prezentat neutru \u0219i echidistant informa\u021bia (Jurnal TV, Unimedia.info, Moldova 1, RTR Moldova). Printre cele mai frecvent admise abateri deontologice se num\u0103r\u0103 generalizarea, lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103, etichetarea \u0219i amestecul faptelor cu opinii.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/32397\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 13 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire (<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201ePierde poporul, c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103 grupul \u00abPro-\u0218or\u00bb\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) la subiectul monitorizat, <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">construit\u0103 \u00een baza unei singure declara\u021bii &#8211;<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">cea a deputatului PSRM Corneliu Furculi\u021b\u0103, care s-a referit la decizia enun\u021bat\u0103 de CC. <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a prezentat informa\u021bia tenden\u021bios, unilateral \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, admi\u021b\u00e2nd mai multe abateri deontologice, printre care:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/BpbpdBwIb9A?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase \u0219i manipulatorii\/Etichetare:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201ePierde poporul, c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103 grupul \u00abPro-\u0218or\u00bb\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Schimbarea<\/strong> <strong>accentelor:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201ePre\u0219edintele frac\u021biunii parlamentare a PSRM, Corneliu Furculi\u021b\u0103, a criticat dur ac\u021biunile partidelor conduse de Maia Sandu \u0219i Andrei N\u0103stase, care au determinat pronun\u021barea hot\u0103r\u00e2ri Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale. El afirm\u0103 c\u0103 din cauza lor au pierdut to\u021bi cet\u0103\u021benii \u0219i a c\u00e2\u0219tigat grupul Pro-\u0218or, asistat de deputa\u021bii Maiei Sandu \u0219i ai lui Andrei N\u0103stase\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a prezentat opinia unor surse f\u0103r\u0103 a expune ini\u021bial informa\u021bia factologic\u0103<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> &#8211; <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">detalii despre Legea Nr. 56; cine a depus sesiz\u0103rile la CC;<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ce a decis Curtea<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">etc., dup\u0103 care opinii pe marginea celor decise<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0&#8211; a\u0219a cum prev\u0103d normele de scriere a unei \u0219tiri. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maia Sandu \u0219i Andrei N\u0103stase au fost viza\u021bi\/acuza\u021bi direct de sursa \u0219tirii, iar jurnali\u0219tii <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> aveau obliga\u021bia s\u0103 le ofere acestora dreptul la replic\u0103, ceea ce nu s-a \u00eent\u00e2mplat.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Estompare.<\/strong> <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a prezentat informa\u021bia doar \u00een baza declara\u021biei unui deputat socialist, f\u0103r\u0103 a o completa cu detalii de context.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/32437\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen buletinul informativ in 14 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire la subiectul monitorizat, cu titlul:<\/span> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eSesiz\u0103ri ce ascund interese personale\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Informa\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103, la fel, \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios, unilateral \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103. Printre abateri s-au num\u0103rat:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/hd9N7Jl0x7s?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Generalizarea:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e&#8230;Aceasta a \u0219i stat la baza sesiz\u0103rilor depuse de deputa\u021bii din opozi\u021bie, consider\u0103 anali\u0219tii politici. Mai exact adresarea la \u00eenalta curte a avut scopul de a proteja interesele personale ale lui Ilan \u0218or, precizeaz\u0103 exper\u021bii\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Tehnica du\u0219manului intern.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Partidele de opozi\u021biei au fost prezentate \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103, fiind acuzate direct de c\u0103tre unele surse. Mai mult, partidelor de opozi\u021bie vizate<\/span> <strong>nu li s-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> pentru a-\u0219i prezenta opinia pe marginea acestui subiect.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Accent TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=79780\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 14 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> dou\u0103 \u0219tiri despre decizia CC. Prima din ele (<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eExper\u021bi: Nu este timpul pentru confrunt\u0103ri politice\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) s-a bazat pe opinia a 3 exper\u021bi<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">care s-au expus nu at\u00e2t marginea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi, c\u00e2t mai degrab\u0103 pe solicitarea depus\u0103 de partidele de opozi\u021bie \u0219i legalitatea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii Guvernului privind asumarea r\u0103spunderii (<\/span><strong>schimbarea accentelor<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">). A doua \u0219tire (<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eCet\u0103\u021benii, despre decizia CC\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) a fost de tip <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">vox-pop, iar aici autorii au admis:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/QCt6ZD-75-o?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201ePoliticienii din \u00eentreaga lume renun\u021b\u0103 la luptele reciproce pentru a-\u0219i consolida toate for\u021bele \u00een lupta \u00eempotriva coronavirusului. \u00cen Moldova, \u00eens\u0103, situa\u021bia este diferit\u0103. Aici opozi\u021bia inten\u021bioneaz\u0103 s\u0103 lanseze b\u0103t\u0103lii politice de amploare&#8230;\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Generalizarea:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eExper\u021bii sunt convin\u0219i c\u0103 sunt pu\u021bine \u0219anse ca \u00cenalta Curte s\u0103 le c\u00e2nte \u00een strun\u0103 opozi\u021biei, ci mai degrab\u0103 invers &#8211; le va p\u0103ta imaginea, iar \u00eentr-un final tot oamenii simpli vor avea de pierdut\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> At\u00e2t partidele de opozi\u021bie, c\u00e2t \u0219i Maia Sandu \u0219i Andrei N\u0103stase \u00een parte, au fost acuza\u021bi\/viza\u021bi direct \u00een \u0219tire, \u00eens\u0103 acestora nu li s-a oferit dreptul s\u0103 se expun\u0103 pe marginea acestui subiect sau pe marginea acuza\u021biilor aduse de unele surse \u00een adresa lor.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00een mare parte \u00een acela\u0219i fel ca \u0219i <\/span><strong>NTV Moldova, cu <\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">acela\u0219i scenariu \u0219i utiliz\u00e2nd acelea\u0219i surse. Postul de televiziune <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a difuzat o \u0219tire (<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eLegea a fost declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u021bional\u0103\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PWq0kpBC7bc\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 13 martie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u0219i alta\u00a0 (<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eEfect negativ asupra economiei\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=eGKfMNfsvDw\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 14 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis mai multe abateri:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Etichetare:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e&#8230;ar avea de c\u00e2\u0219tigat oligarhul fugar Ilan \u0218or\u201d.<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Partidele de opozi\u021bie (PAS, PPDA \u0219i grupul Pro-Moldova) \u0219i unii politicieni au fost viza\u021bi direct, dar acestora nu li s-a oferit dreptul la replic\u0103.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Generalizare:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eLupta politic\u0103 va lovi asupra businessului \u0219i asupra simplilor cet\u0103\u021beni. A\u0219a comenteaz\u0103 politologii \u0219i economi\u0219tii ac\u021biunile partidelor de opozi\u021bie care au depus cereri la CC\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Tehnica du\u0219manului intern.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Partidele \u0219i politicienii de opozi\u021bie au fost prezenta\u021bi \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103, fiind \u00eenvinui\u021bi de unele surse c\u0103 lupt\u0103 \u00eempotriva cet\u0103\u021benilor Republicii Moldova.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Moldova 1<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire despre decizia CC <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-13-aprilie-2020\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een \u201eMesager\u201d-ul din 13 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Informa\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">neutru \u0219i echidistant. Jurnali\u0219tii postului public <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">nu au admis <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">abateri deontologice \u0219i\/sau tehnici de dezinformare.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/1ca8b35324fb0883\/jurnalul-orei-19-13-aprilie.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 13 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire (<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eLegea declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u021bional\u0103\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) despre decizia CC. Televiziunea a prezentat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 admit\u0103 abateri deontologice sau tehnici de dezinformare.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a reflectat subiectul <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rtr.md\/vesti-moldova\/102181380\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 14 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Postul TV a \u00eenceput buletinul informativ cu o \u0219tire despre inten\u021bia Guvernului Chicu de a \u00eenainta repetat <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201elegea<\/span><\/em> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">care a fost declarat\u0103<\/span><\/em> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">anticonstitu\u021bional\u0103 cu pu\u021bin timp \u00een urm\u0103\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a inclus opiniile premierului Ion Chicu, ale pre\u0219edintelui Igor Dodon, ale deputa\u021bilor Corneliu Furculi\u021b\u0103 \u0219i<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0 <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Andrian Candu, \u0219i ale liderei PAS, Maia Sandu. \u00cen a doua \u0219tire, <\/span><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a prezentat argumentele pre\u0219edintelui CC, Vladimir \u021aurcan, privind decizia de a se retrage din procesul de examinare a sesiz\u0103rilor depuse de partidele de opozi\u021bie la CC. \u00cen acest caz, <\/span><strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> nu a admis abateri.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=GMABXy6yyjM\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 13 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. \u00cen mare parte, aceast\u0103 institu\u021bie media a reflectat informa\u021bia neutru \u0219i echidistant. Totu\u0219i, autorii au a admis un caz de <\/span><strong>generalizare<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e&#8230;Vladimir \u021aurcan a declarat c\u0103 se ab\u021bine de la examinarea sesiz\u0103rilor, dup\u0103 ce \u00een spa\u021biul mediatic au fost lansate critici dure \u00een adresa sa de c\u0103tre politicieni \u0219i societatea civil\u0103\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/GMABXy6yyjM?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat o \u0219tire despre decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/prime.md\/ro\/emisiune\/primele-stiri-13-aprilie-2020-21-00-2512-video---98279.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 13 aprilie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Informa\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod neutru.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Singura abatere admis\u0103 de jurnali\u0219ti vizeaz\u0103 faptul c\u0103, odat\u0103 ce au<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">difuzat opiniile \u0219i declara\u021biile reprezentan\u021bilor<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0 <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Guvernului, PAS, PPDA \u0219i ai grupului Pro-Moldova (din cadrul \u0219edin\u021bei CC), atunci, pentru asigurarea echilibrului, <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">era indicat s\u0103 se ofere spa\u021biu de emisie pentru opinii directe \u0219i reprezentan\u021bilor PSRM (de asemenea<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">prezen\u021bi<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">la \u0219edin\u021ba CC). Totodat\u0103, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/primelestiri.md\/ro\/primele-stiri-14-aprilie-2020-21-00---98305.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 14 martie 2020<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat. Una din ele s-a referit la briefingul pre\u0219edintelui CC, Vladimir \u021aurcan, \u00een cadrul c\u0103ruia judec\u0103torul \u0219i-a argumentat decizia de a se retrage din procesul de examinare a sesiz\u0103rilor. A doua a vizat opinia premierului Chicu pe marginea sesiz\u0103rilor opozi\u021biei, dar \u0219i replica celor din urm\u0103. \u00cen acest caz, <\/span><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a admis un caz de <\/span><strong>amestec al faptelor cu opinii<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eDecizia \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi l-a sup\u0103rat pe premierul Ion Chicu\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen perioada 13-14 aprilie 2020, <\/span><strong>Publika TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a difuzat la televizor<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u0219i a publicat pe platforma online 4 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat. \u00cen reflectarea informa\u021biei, jurnali\u0219tii de la <\/span><strong>Publika TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> au urmat<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">acela\u0219i scenariu, au folosit acelea\u0219i imagini video \u0219i acela\u0219i text ca \u0219i \u00een cazul <\/span><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat 7 \u0219tiri \u00een perioada 13-14 aprilie 2020 la subiectul monitorizat. Portalul\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/b43e6f994190eb95\/live-curtea-constitutionala-examineaza-legea-asupra-careia-guvernul-si-a-asumat-raspunderea.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">transmis \u00een direct \u0219edin\u021ba CC<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, a prezentat \u00eentr-o \u0219tire <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/643e9ac89bc41829\/curtea-constitutionala-argumenteaza-decizia-privind-legea-anticriza-a-guvernului-chicu-o-incalcare-de-procedura.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">decizia integral\u0103 \u0219i argumentarea CC<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, precum \u0219i <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/0cb6dfa6870208ee\/reactiile-opozitiei-dupa-ce-legea-asumata-de-guvernul-chicu-a-fost-declarata-neconstitutionala.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">opiniile partidelor de opozi\u021bie asupra deciziei CC<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00een alt material<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Totodat\u0103, <\/span><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a relatat <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">despre <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/6e99340098b7186c\/presedintele-curtii-constitutionale-vladimir-turcan-tine-o-conferinta-de-presa.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">declara\u021biile pre\u0219edintelui Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, Vladimir \u021aurcan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> privind decizia acestuia de a se retrage din procesul de examinare, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/ebf93bce6a7ca1857\/precizarile-lui-igor-dodon-despre-discutia-cu-seful-cc-dialogul-interinstitutional-al-presedintelui-se-circumscrie-in-exercitiul-separarii-si-colaborarii-puterilor.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">unele preciz\u0103ri ale pre\u0219edintelui Igor Dodon<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, dar \u0219i <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/0f4b08682ddee8b2\/guvernul-chicu-incearca-aceeasi-portita-executivul-isi-va-asuma-din-nou-raspunderea-pe-aceeasi-lege.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ac\u021biunile de viitor ale Guvernului Chicu<\/span><\/a> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">odat\u0103 ce legea a fost abrogat\u0103<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Redac\u021bia a prezentat informa\u021bia neutru, echidistant \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 abateri deontologice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-12946 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/sputnik-1-350x186.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"186\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/sputnik-1-350x186.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/sputnik-1.jpg 907w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen perioada 13-14 aprilie 2020, <\/span><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat 4 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/society\/20200413\/29862725\/Vladimir-Turcan-Ma-voi-abtine-de-la-examinarea-contestatiilor-legii-asumate-de-Guvern.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00cen una din\u00a0<\/span><\/a><a style=\"text-align: justify;\" href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/society\/20200413\/29862725\/Vladimir-Turcan-Ma-voi-abtine-de-la-examinarea-contestatiilor-legii-asumate-de-Guvern.html\">acestea<\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, institu\u021bia nu a oferit <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: justify;\">drept<\/strong> <strong style=\"text-align: justify;\">la replic\u0103<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> partidelor de opozi\u021bie vizate \u0219i acuzate direct de pre\u0219edintele Igor Dodon \u0219i prim-ministrul <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ion Chicu.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kp.md<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> a publicat 3 articole cu referire la decizia CC. Portalul a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103, prezent\u00e2nd partidele de opozi\u021bie (PAS, PPDA, Grupul Pro-Moldova, Partidul \u0218or) \u0219i\/sau reprezentan\u021bii acestora (Maia Sandu, Andrei N\u0103stase, Alexandru Slusari) \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 exclusiv negativ\u0103. Printre abaterile admise de aceast\u0103 institu\u021bie media se num\u0103r\u0103:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3834574\/\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii\/titluri tenden\u021bioase<\/strong><\/a><strong>:<\/strong> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201eCurtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Moldovei a decis: taxele aeroportuare r\u0103m\u00e2n \u00een buzunarul lui Ilan \u0218or (&#8230;)<\/span><\/em> <em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a luat decizia \u00een favoarea \u00abPro-\u0218OR\u00bb: taxele aeroportuare nu vor fi transferate \u00een bugetul de stat\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (orig. <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e\u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u043b: \u0430\u044d\u0440\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0431\u043e\u0440 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u0418\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u0428\u043e\u0440\u0430 (&#8230;) \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u043b \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443 \u00abPro-SOR\u00bb: \u0430\u044d\u0440\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0431\u043e\u0440 \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f\u0442 \u0432 \u0433\u043e\u0441\u0431\u044e\u0434\u0436\u0435\u0442\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">).\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3834635\/\"><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong><\/a><strong>.<\/strong><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00cen una din \u0219tiri, partidele de opozi\u021bie au fost \u00eenvinuite de <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201epropagand\u0103 \u0219i specula\u021bii\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (orig. <\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201e\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430 \u0438 \u0441\u043f\u0435\u043a\u0443\u043b\u044f\u0446\u0438\u0438\u201d<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">),\u00a0 f\u0103r\u0103 a le fi oferit dreptul la replic\u0103.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>La 2 aprilie 2020, Guvernul \u0219i-a asumat r\u0103spunderea asupra <\/em><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/mf.gov.md\/ro\/content\/proiectul-hg-cu-privire-la-angajarea-r%C4%83spunderii-asupra-proiectului-de-lege-privind-0\"><strong><em>unui proiect de lege (Nr. 56)<\/em><\/strong><\/a><strong><em> care prevedea mai multe m\u0103suri de sus\u021binere a cet\u0103\u021benilor \u0219i mediului de afaceri \u00een perioada st\u0103rii de urgen\u021b\u0103 \u0219i presupunea modificarea mai multor legi \u00een acest sens. La 7 aprilie 2020, c\u00e2\u021biva deputa\u021bi ai PAS, PPDA \u0219i ai grupului Pro-Moldova au depus c\u00e2teva sesiz\u0103ri la Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 pentru a anula trei prevederi \u201eextrem de nocive care au fost b\u0103gate pe ultima sut\u0103 de metri \u00een asumarea de Guvern\u201d, cum a men\u021bionat Dinu Pl\u00eeng\u0103u, deputat PPDA. Printre prevederile catalogate drept \u201eabuzive\u201d s-au num\u0103rat <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>cele cu privire la modificarea privind vizibilitatea produselor din tutun, introducerea \u00een regim duty-free a m\u0103rfurilor cu acciz \u0219i introducerea taxelor pe resurse naturale. \u00cen baza acestor sesiz\u0103ri, la 9 aprilie 2020, magistra\u021bii CC au decis suspendarea \u00eentregului proiectul<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>de lege prin care Guvernul \u0219i-a angajat r\u0103spunderea. Pe 13 aprilie 2020, CC s-a \u00eentrunit \u00eentr-o \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 \u00een care a decis c\u0103 Legea prin care Guvernul \u0219i-a asumat r\u0103spunderea este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em><strong>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em><strong>___________________________<\/strong><\/em><em><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Realizarea acestui articol a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului american \u0219i poporului britanic prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite.<\/em><\/p>\n<h5><strong><em>Sursa foto: captur\u0103 foto Unimedia.info<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Republicii Moldova (CC) privind suspendarea Legii Nr. 56 din 2 aprilie 2020, prin intermediul c\u0103reia Guvernul Chicu \u0219i-a asumat r\u0103spunderea \u00een fa\u021ba Parlamentului, a fost reflectat\u0103 de toate institu\u021biile monitorizate. Unele s-au folosit de subiect\u00a0ca s\u0103 defavorizeze \u0219i s\u0103 pun\u0103 \u00een lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103 partidele de opozi\u021bie care au depus\u00a0 sesiz\u0103ri la<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":12944,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Decizia CC privind legea de asumare a r\u0103spunderii de c\u0103tre Guvernul Chicu \u0219i mostrele de manipulare din partea presei afiliate PSRM - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Republicii Moldova (CC) privind suspendarea Legii Nr. 56 din 2 aprilie 2020, prin intermediul c\u0103reia Guvernul Chicu \u0219i-a asumat r\u0103spunderea \u00een fa\u021ba Parlamentului, a fost reflectat\u0103 de toate institu\u021biile monitorizate. Unele s-au folosit de subiect\u00a0ca s\u0103 defavorizeze \u0219i s\u0103 pun\u0103 \u00een lumin\u0103 negativ\u0103 partidele de opozi\u021bie care au depus\u00a0 sesiz\u0103ri laMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-04-24T08:46:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-06-22T14:35:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/unimedia.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"647\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"362\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/unimedia.jpg\",\"width\":647,\"height\":362},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Decizia CC privind legea de asumare a r\\u0103spunderii de c\\u0103tre Guvernul Chicu \\u0219i mostrele de manipulare din partea presei afiliate PSRM - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-24T08:46:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-06-22T14:35:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/a165a1637d65d9e62c0fa2394a7fd62e\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-decizia-cc-privind-legea-de-asumare-raspunderii-de-catre-guvernul-chicu-si-mostrele-de-manipulare-din-partea-presei-afiliate-psrm\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/a165a1637d65d9e62c0fa2394a7fd62e\",\"name\":\"czavatin@gmail.com\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12943"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12943"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13704,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12943\/revisions\/13704"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}