{"id":12214,"date":"2020-02-25T07:51:58","date_gmt":"2020-02-25T07:51:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=12214"},"modified":"2020-02-28T08:35:42","modified_gmt":"2020-02-28T08:35:42","slug":"studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din PDM: opinii \u00een loc de fapte, titluri tenden\u021bioase \u0219i etichet\u0103ri f\u0103r\u0103 limit\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u0218tirea despre \u201eruptura din PDM\u201d \u0219i plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din frac\u021biunea parlamentar\u0103 \u0219i din partid a fost reflectat\u0103 de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate.<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-12216 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz-350x293.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"293\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz-350x293.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/img-studii-de-caz.png 940w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a> Majoritatea acestora \u2013 cu excep\u021bia Moldova 1, RTR Moldova, Jurnal TV \u0219i Unimedia.info \u2013 au admis cel pu\u021bin o abatere deontologic\u0103 \u0219i\/sau o tehnic\u0103 de manipulare \u00een prezentarea informa\u021biei. Cele mai multe au fost identificate \u00een cazul NTV Moldova, Accent TV, Primul \u00een Moldova \u0219i Kp.md. Cele patru institu\u021bii media au abordat la fel subiectul \u0219i au folosit etichet\u0103ri, titluri tenden\u021bioase, amestecul faptelor cu opiniile \u0219i schimb\u0103ri de accente. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a reflectat evenimentul despre plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din Partidul Democrat (PDM) printr-o \u0219tire \u00een <a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/30619\">buletinul informativ din 19 februarie 2020<\/a>. Televiziunea a abordat tenden\u021bios subiectul, pun\u00e2nd mai mult accentul pe opinii \u0219i judec\u0103\u021bi de valoare dec\u00e2t pe fapte. \u00cen \u0219tirea difuzat\u0103, <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titlu tenden\u021bios:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePDM, p\u0103r\u0103sit de \u00abGrupul Plahotniuc\u00bb\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Etichet\u0103ri:<\/strong> <em>\u201eRuptur\u0103 \u00een Partidul Democrat. Un grup format din 6 deputa\u021bi apropia\u021bi oligarhului fugar Vladimir Planotniuc&#8230;\u201d; \u201eGrupul separatist este condus de finul de cununie al lui Vladimir Plahotniuc, Andrian Candu\u201d; \u201ePavel Filip a reac\u021bionat la anun\u021bul grupului separatist din partid\u201d;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii\/sugestia:<\/strong> <em>\u201e&#8230;decizia vine dup\u0103 ce acum c\u00e2teva zile ace\u0219tia \u0219i-au pierdut func\u021biile de conducere din partid\u201d; \u201ePe l\u00e2ng\u0103 Candu, \u0219i Sergiu S\u00eerbu este un apropiat al oligarhului Plahotniuc, dat \u00een urm\u0103rire interna\u021bional\u0103 pentru mai multe infrac\u021biuni grave&#8230;\u201d; \u201eSergiu S\u00eerbu i-a oferit consultan\u021b\u0103 lui Plahotniuc \u0219i, potrivit unui comunicat de la Procuratura General\u0103, ar fi intermediat mituirea deputa\u021bilor comuni\u0219ti pentru ca ace\u0219tia s\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103seasc\u0103 PCRM\u201d;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Manipulare prin intermediul imaginilor\/transferul de imagine negativ\u0103.<\/strong> <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a insistat mai mult pe imagini cu Vladimir Plahotniuc, de la evenimente anterioare (chiar din debutul \u0219tirii), \u0219i mai pu\u021bin pe cele de la conferin\u021ba propriu-zis\u0103 a celor 6 deputa\u021bi. Totodat\u0103, 2\/3 din imaginile video ale \u0219tirii l-au avut \u00een prim-plan pe Vladimir Plahotniuc, dar nu pe actorii principali ai \u0219tirii (grupul celor 6 deputa\u021bi);<\/li>\n<li><strong>Schimbare de accente.<\/strong>\u00a0\u00cen cazul\u00a0<strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> \u0219tirea a fost mai mult despre <em>\u201eoligarhul fugar Vladimir Plahotniuc\u201d<\/em>, dec\u00e2t despre cei 6 deputa\u021bi PDM care au p\u0103r\u0103sit partidul.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=76113\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 19 februarie 2020<\/a>, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri la subiectul monitorizat. Redac\u021bia i-a pus \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 defavorabil\u0103 pe cei 6 deputa\u021bi, admi\u021b\u00e2nd mai multe \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri deontologice \u0219i tehnici de manipulare. \u00cen prima \u0219tire, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a men\u021bionat despre evenimentul propriu-zis, iar a doua a fost despre opiniile unor exper\u021bi politici pe marginea plec\u0103rii politicienilor din PDM. <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase:<\/strong> <em>\u201e<\/em><em>\u00ab<\/em><em>Gruparea lui Plahotniuc<\/em><em>\u00bb<\/em><em>\u201d a plecat din PDM\u201d; \u201eInteresele financiare \u0219i rocada politic\u0103\u201d;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong> <em>\u201e6 deputa\u021bi ai PDM, cunoscu\u021bi ca fiind apropia\u021bi lui Vladimir Plahotniuc, au plecat at\u00e2t din frac\u021biunea PDM, c\u00e2t \u0219i din partid\u201d; \u201e&#8230;trebuie specificat c\u0103 privind aspectul financiar din spatele deciziei de a p\u0103r\u0103si grupul lui Plahotniuc a l\u0103sat s\u0103 se \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 \u0219i pre\u0219edintele de onoare a PDM, Dumitru Diacov, atunci c\u00e2nd a scris \u00eentr-o postare pe o re\u021bea de socializare c\u0103 aceast\u0103 decizie a fost luat\u0103 \u00eempreun\u0103 cu sponsorii\u201d;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Generalizare\/etichetare:<\/strong> <em>\u201eParlamentarii grupului Plahotniuc, a\u0219a cum i-au botezat jurnali\u0219tii&#8230;\u201d;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Schimbare de accente:<\/strong> \u201e<em>Este de remarcat faptul c\u0103 Candu a confirmat ulterior c\u0103 a coordonat decizia de retragerea a grupului cu fostul pre\u0219edinte al PDM, Vladimir Plahotniuc\u201d<\/em>. Andrian Candu, at\u00e2t \u00een cadrul briefingului, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een alte interven\u021bii publice, a men\u021bionat c\u0103 el <em>\u201ea discutat \u0219i l-a anun\u021bat despre decizia lui\u201d<\/em>, \u00eens\u0103 nu a <em>\u201ecoordonat decizia\u201d<\/em>, a\u0219a cum au men\u021bionat jurnali\u0219tii de la <strong>Accent TV<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/wtG_mKCWGgE\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Pngbdh7NXp4\"><strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong><\/a> a reflectat \u0219tirea despre p\u0103r\u0103sirea partidului de c\u0103tre cei 6 deputa\u021bi folosind acela\u0219i scenariu \u0219i, \u00een mare parte, acela\u0219i text \u0219i imagini ca \u0219i <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong>. <strong>Primul \u00een Moldova<\/strong> l-a pus pe Andrian Candu \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 defavorabil\u0103, a abordat subiectul pe un ton tenden\u021bios \u0219i a f\u0103cut abuz de opinii\/judec\u0103\u021bi de valoare \u00een schimbul faptelor. Postul de televiziune a admis:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Etichet\u0103ri:<\/strong> <em>\u201eRuptur\u0103 \u00een PDM. Mai mul\u021bi deputa\u021bi apropia\u021bi oligarhului fugar Vladimir Plahotniuc au anun\u021bat c\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103sesc PDM\u201d; \u201eAndrian Candu este finul de cununie al oligarhului fugar Vladimir Plahotniuc\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opinii\/sugestie:<\/strong> <em>\u201eRuptur\u0103 \u00een PDM. Dup\u0103 ce au pierdut func\u021biile de conducere \u00een forma\u021biune, mai mul\u021bi deputa\u021bi democra\u021bi apropia\u021bi oligarhului fugar Vlad Plahotniuc anun\u021b\u0103 c\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103sesc partidul. Declara\u021bia a fost f\u0103cut\u0103 de finul de cununie al fostului lider democrat, Andrian Candu\u201d; \u201eDeputa\u021bii apropia\u021bi lui Vladimir Plahotniuc s-au declarat sup\u0103ra\u021bi de decizia PDM de a purta discu\u021bii cu frac\u021biunea PSRM, de\u0219i \u00een vara anului 2019 c\u00e2nd erau la conducerea PDM, S\u00eerbu \u0219i Candu au sus\u021binut idea unei coali\u021bii PDM-PSRM\u201d; \u201ePre\u0219edintele de onoare al PDM, Dumitru Diacov, a fost mai pu\u021bin tacticos, el s-a ar\u0103tat sigur c\u0103 aceast\u0103 decizie era a\u0219teptat\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 din perioada de conducere a lui Vladimir Plahotniuc c\u00e2nd grupul Candu preg\u0103tea fuziunea cu social-democra\u021bii\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rtr.md\/vesti-moldova\/102177956\/\">\u00cen buletinul informativ din 19 februarie 2020<\/a>, <strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a difuzat trei \u0219tiri despre subiectul monitorizat sau tangen\u021biale cu acesta. <strong>RTR Moldova<\/strong> a reflectat informa\u021bia obiectiv \u0219i echidistant, atribuind \u0219i oferind spa\u021biu de emisie, implicit dreptul la replic\u0103, tuturor celor implica\u021bi sau viza\u021bi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri despre decizia celor 6 deputa\u021bi de a p\u0103r\u0103si Partidul Democrat. Prima din ele a fost despre decizia propriu-zis\u0103 \u0219i briefingul sus\u021binut de deputa\u021bii care au p\u0103r\u0103sit PDM-ul, iar a doua despre reac\u021biile\/opiniile celorlalte partide despre aceast\u0103 scindare. <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> nu a admis abateri deontologice \u0219i nu a folosit tehnici de manipulare \u00een reflectarea informa\u021biei pe marginea subiectului monitorizat. <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a difuzat, la fel, dou\u0103 \u0219tiri <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/06501fd98e1ff9b5\/jurnalul-orei-19-19-februarie.html\">\u00een buletinul informativ din 19 februarie 2020<\/a> &#8211; una de la briefingul celor 6 deputa\u021bi care au anun\u021bat ie\u0219irea lor din PDM, iar a doua despre reac\u021bia PPDA. Televiziunea public\u0103 a reflectat informa\u021bia f\u0103r\u0103 a admite anumite abateri deontologice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103 <\/strong>a difuzat o \u0219tire la subiectul monitorizat. \u00cen informa\u021bia prezentat\u0103, acest post de televiziune a admis <strong>lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong>. \u00cen cadrul briefingului, Andrian Candu a men\u021bionat c\u0103 au existat mai mul\u021bi membri ai PDM care urmau s\u0103 se al\u0103ture grupului celor 6, \u00eens\u0103 ace\u0219tia au fost <em>\u201e\u0219antaja\u021bi de conducerea PDM\u201d<\/em>. Reie\u0219ind din faptul c\u0103 acuza\u021bia este grav\u0103, iar <strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> a inclus-o \u00een \u0219tire, jurnali\u0219tii aveau misiunea s\u0103 ofere\/solicite opinia\u00a0 conducerii PDM, ceea ce nu au f\u0103cut.<\/p>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/yWg2twOyOBA\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a prezentat \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 favorabil\u0103 decizia celor 6 deputa\u021bi de a p\u0103r\u0103si PDM-ul. Televiziunea a acordat acestui eveniment aproape 3\/4 din timpul de emisie a <a href=\"https:\/\/prime.md\/ro\/emisiune\/primele-stiri-19-februarie-2020-21-00-2512-video---97478.html\">buletinului de \u0219tiri din 19 februarie 2020<\/a> (aproape 32 de minute din 50 de minute \u00een total), difuz\u00e2nd 2 \u0219tiri \u0219i un interviu \u00een direct cu Andrian Candu (24 de minute sau aproape jum\u0103tate din timpul de emisie a buletinului de \u0219tiri). Printre abaterile admise de <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> se num\u0103r\u0103:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> \u00cen timpul briefingului, Candu a men\u021bionat c\u0103 unii din membrii PDM au fost \u0219antaja\u021bi s\u0103 nu se al\u0103ture grupului celor 6. <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> avea misiunea s\u0103 asigure dreptul la replic\u0103\/opinie reprezenta\u021bilor forma\u021biunii pe marginea acuza\u021biilor lansate, fie \u00een aceea\u0219i \u0219tire, fie \u00een \u0219tirea urm\u0103toare, \u00een care a fost prezentat\u0103 reac\u021bia lui Pavel Filip despre ie\u0219irea celor 6 din partid. Jurnali\u0219tii de la Prime TV nu i-au solicitat \u00eens\u0103 opinia privind presupusa \u0219antajare.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase \u0219i manipulatorii:<\/strong> <em>\u201eDecizie salutat\u0103\u201d<\/em> &#8211; prin acest titlu\u00a0<strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a sugerat (<strong>tehnica sugestiei<\/strong>) c\u0103 liderii PPDA au salutat decizia celor 6 deputa\u021bi de a p\u0103r\u0103si PDM-ul. Totu\u0219i, \u00een reac\u021biile reprezentan\u021bilor PPDA \u0219i declara\u021biile incluse \u00een \u0219tire nu se sugereaz\u0103 nici pe departe c\u0103 liderii acestui partid au <em>\u201esalutat decizia\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/prime.md\/embed\/97478.html\" width=\"600\" height=\"358\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen \u0219tirile sale, <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/un-grup-de-deputati-ai-pdm-a-decis-sa-paraseasca-fractiunea-democratilor-_3067251.html\">a reflectat informa\u021bia despre plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din PDM<\/a> utiliz\u00e2nd \u00een mare parte acela\u0219i text, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/liderii-ppda-saluta-decizia-deputatilor-democrati-care-au-parasit-formatiunea_3067306.html\">scenariu \u0219i imagini video<\/a> ca \u0219i <strong>Prime TV<\/strong>. Totodat\u0103, <strong>Publika TV<\/strong> a admis <strong>lipsa dreptului la replic\u0103<\/strong> atunci c\u00e2nd Pavel Filip a fost acuzat c\u0103 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publika.md\/vicepresedintele-tineretului-democrat-ion-harghel-a-parasit-echipa-lui-pavel-filip_3067264.html\"><em>\u201enu este un lupt\u0103tor&#8230; ci un executor\u201d<\/em><\/a> de fostul vicepre\u0219edinte al Tineretului Democrat, Ion Harghel.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pe 19 februarie 2020, <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a publicat 8 \u0219tiri despre plecarea deputa\u021bilor din PDM. Institu\u021bia a oferit detalii din cadrul briefingului, reac\u021bia lui Pavel Filip \u0219i a altor reprezenta\u021bi PDM, opiniile altor partide politice despre ruptura PDM (PSRM, PPDA), precum \u0219i p\u0103rerile unor anali\u0219ti politici despre eveniment. \u00cen una din \u0219tiri, <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a admis o <a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/opinie\/20200219\/29251645\/Scindarea-PDM-Roman-Mihaes.html\"><strong>generalizare\/trimire la surse imposibil de verificat:<\/strong><\/a> <em>\u201e<\/em><em>Observatorii politici apreciaz\u0103 c\u0103 acest grup de deputa\u021bi ar fi apropia\u021bi ai fostului lider PDM Vlad Plahotniuc\u201d. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a publicat 7 \u0219tiri despre ruptura din PDM pe parcursul zilei de 19 februarie 2020. <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a reflectat \u00een \u0219tiri separate opiniile \u0219i declara\u021biile tuturor p\u0103r\u021bilor implicate \u00een aceast\u0103 scindare (<a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/af398ca37ba0d9b2\/live-andrian-candu-despre-situatia-din-partidul-democrat.html\">Andrian Candu<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/a7704f632dc628bc\/filip-despre-plecarea-celor-sase-deputati-din-pd-nu-au-venit-la-partid-sa-si-expuna-nemultumirile-ci-au-ales-sa-fuga.html\">Pavel Filip<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/418a70c38ce86ab2\/reactia-lui-diacov-dupa-ce-grupul-candu-a-parasit-pd-este-regretabil-dar-pentru-noi-era-clar-mai-demult.html\">Dumitru Diacov<\/a>), inclusiv opinia unui <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/68a3a1b4e8706a3c\/analist-politic-despre-plecarea-grupului-candu.html?utm_source=Site%20Widgets&amp;utm_medium=Related%20Widget&amp;utm_campaign=Related%20Widget\">analist politic<\/a> (Igor Volni\u021bchi) \u0219i <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/6754b73ed85638eb\/socialist-despre-plecarea-grupului-candu-din-pd-asta-i-un-fel-de-bumerang-politic.html\">a unui reprezentat al PSRM<\/a> (Grigore Novac). \u00cen cazul acestei institu\u021bii media nu au fost identificate anumite abateri deontologice \u00een reflectarea informa\u021biei despre subiectul monitorizat.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a publicat 3 \u0219tiri pe 19 februarie 2020 despre scindarea din PDM. Institu\u021bia a reflectat tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103 informa\u021bia din ele. <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a admis:<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Kp.md_.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-12219 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Kp.md_-298x350.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"298\" height=\"350\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Kp.md_-298x350.png 298w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Kp.md_.png 660w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Etichetare\/Sugestie:<\/strong> \u201e<em>Cei mari \u0219ase \u0219i o surpriz\u0103: Un grup de deputa\u021bi ai PDM a p\u0103r\u0103sit frac\u021biunea parlamentar\u0103 (rus\u0103: <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3771099\/\"><em>\u201e\u0412\u0435\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043f\u043d\u0430\u044f <\/em><em>\u00ab<\/em><em>\u0448\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0430<\/em><em>\u00bb<\/em><em> \u0438 \u0441\u044e\u0440\u043f\u0440\u0438\u0437: \u0413\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u043f\u0443\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0414\u0435\u043c\u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u041c\u043e\u043b\u0434\u043e\u0432\u044b \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0438\u043d\u0443\u043b\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0443\u044e \u0444\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044e\u201d<\/em><\/a><em>)<\/em>. Astfel,<b>\u00a0<\/b>redac\u021bia\u00a0a sugerat c\u0103 cei 6 ar fi ni\u0219te vasali [<em>\u201e\u0448\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0430\u201d<\/em> \u00een rus\u0103 av\u00e2nd \u0219i conota\u021bia de slug\u0103, <em>n.a.<\/em>] ai lui Vladimir Plahotniuc. De altfel, acest termen a fost men\u021bionat \u0219i repetat \u00een toate cele 3 \u0219tiri publicate de <strong>Kp.md<\/strong>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ironie:<\/strong> <em>\u201eDespre aceasta a anun\u021bat Candu cu pu\u021bin timp \u00een urm\u0103 \u00een cadrul unui briefing. A promis, de asemenea, \u0219i surprize. Se va \u00eentoarce oare Plahotniuc \u0219i va coordona situa\u021bia? Sau va coordona din umbr\u0103?\u201d (rus\u0103: \u201e\u041e\u0431 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u041a\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0443 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0431\u0449\u0438\u043b \u0442\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430 \u0431\u0440\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043d\u0433\u0435. \u0410 \u0435\u0449\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043e\u0431<\/em><em>\u0435<\/em><em>\u0449\u0430\u043b \u0441\u044e\u0440\u043f\u0440\u0438\u0437\u044b. \u041f\u043b\u0430\u0445\u043e\u0442\u043d\u044e\u043a \u0432\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043b\u0438 \u0438 \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442 \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u044d\u0442\u043e? \u0418\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0442, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440, \u0432\u0442\u0435\u043c\u043d\u0443\u044e?\u201d)<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3771247\/\"><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong><\/a> <em>\u201e\u0218ase deputa\u021bi (&#8230;) apropia\u021bi lui Vlad Plahotniuc au p\u0103r\u0103sit ast\u0103zi r\u00e2ndurile PDM&#8230;\u201d (rus\u0103: \u201e\u0428\u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0434\u0435\u043f\u0443\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0432 (&#8230;) \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0412\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0430 \u041f\u043b\u0430\u0445\u043e\u0442\u043d\u044e\u043a\u0430, \u0441\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0438\u043d\u0443\u043b\u0438 \u0440\u044f\u0434\u044b \u0414\u041f\u041c&#8230;\u201d)<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Context: <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>Pe 19 februarie 2020, \u00een cadrul unui briefing de pres\u0103 organizat \u00een incinta Parlamentului, \u0219ase deputa\u021bi din frac\u021biunea Partidului Democrat au anun\u021bat c\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103sesc PDM-ul \u0219i urmeaz\u0103 s\u0103 formeze o nou\u0103 frac\u021biune parlamentar\u0103. Printre ace\u0219tia se num\u0103r\u0103 Andrian Candu, Sergiu S\u00eerbu, Vladimir Cebotari, Eleonora Graur, Corneliu Padnevici \u0219i Grigore Repesciuc. Motivul \u201erupturii\u201d, potrivit parlamentarilor, ar fi apropierea forma\u021biunii de PSRM \u0219i lipsa de viziune a conducerii PDM. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em><strong>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Sursa foto: Captur\u0103 privesc.eu<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">__________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Realizarea acestui articol a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului american \u0219i poporului britanic prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0218tirea despre \u201eruptura din PDM\u201d \u0219i plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din frac\u021biunea parlamentar\u0103 \u0219i din partid a fost reflectat\u0103 de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Majoritatea acestora \u2013 cu excep\u021bia Moldova 1, RTR Moldova, Jurnal TV \u0219i Unimedia.info \u2013 au admis cel pu\u021bin o abatere deontologic\u0103 \u0219i\/sau o tehnic\u0103 de manipulare \u00een prezentarea informa\u021biei.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":12215,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din PDM: opinii \u00een loc de fapte, titluri tenden\u021bioase \u0219i etichet\u0103ri f\u0103r\u0103 limit\u0103 - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u0218tirea despre \u201eruptura din PDM\u201d \u0219i plecarea celor 6 deputa\u021bi din frac\u021biunea parlamentar\u0103 \u0219i din partid a fost reflectat\u0103 de toate cele 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. Majoritatea acestora \u2013 cu excep\u021bia Moldova 1, RTR Moldova, Jurnal TV \u0219i Unimedia.info \u2013 au admis cel pu\u021bin o abatere deontologic\u0103 \u0219i\/sau o tehnic\u0103 de manipulare \u00een prezentarea informa\u021biei.Mai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-25T07:51:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-28T08:35:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/briefing-Candu.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"674\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"359\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/briefing-Candu.png\",\"width\":674,\"height\":359},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Plecarea celor 6 deputa\\u021bi din PDM: opinii \\u00een loc de fapte, titluri tenden\\u021bioase \\u0219i etichet\\u0103ri f\\u0103r\\u0103 limit\\u0103 - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-25T07:51:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-28T08:35:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-plecarea-celor-6-deputati-din-pdm-opinii-loc-de-fapte-titluri-tendentioase-si-etichetari-fara-limita\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12214"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12214"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12214\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12275,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12214\/revisions\/12275"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12215"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}