{"id":10722,"date":"2019-05-02T06:40:59","date_gmt":"2019-05-02T06:40:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=10722"},"modified":"2019-05-20T14:02:36","modified_gmt":"2019-05-20T14:02:36","slug":"studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Alfabetul media al negocierilor post-electorale dintre PSRM \u015fi Blocul ACUM: \u00eentre fapte, opinii, etichet\u0103ri, generaliz\u0103ri \u0219i ironii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Modu<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>l \u00een care a fost reflectat subiectul privind negocierile post-electorale dintre Partidul<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-10334\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto-350x293.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"293\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto-350x293.png 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto.png 940w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a> Sociali\u0219tilor din Republica Moldova (PSRM) \u0219i Blocul ACUM &#8211; care au avut loc pe 11 aprilie 2019 &#8211; au oscilat \u00een func\u021bie de preferin\u021bele politice ale celor 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. \u0218i anume, multe dintre ele au tratat subiectul \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i dezechilibrat, prezent\u00e2nd cele dou\u0103 forma\u021biuni politice \u0219i pe exponen\u021bii acestora fie \u00een context negativ, fie \u00een unul pozitiv, abordare direct propor\u021bional\u0103 cu atitudinea proprietarilor fa\u021b\u0103 de cele dou\u0103 entit\u0103\u021bi parlamentare. Unele institu\u021bii media au abuzat de etichet\u0103ri repetitive (Prime TV), altele au selectat, au inclus \u0219i au prezentat dispropor\u021bionat opiniile actorilor principali \u00een subiectul monitorizat (NTV Moldova, Sputnik.md), iar un al treilea grup a f\u0103cut apel la ironii (TV8), titluri tenden\u021bioase \u0219i generaliz\u0103ri (Accent TV), precum \u0219i la transferul de imagine negativ\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 a asigura dreptul la replic\u0103 celor viza\u021bi (Televiziunea <\/em><\/strong><strong>Central\u0103). <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.prime.md\/ro\/emisiune\/primele-stiri_2514_video_89964_pagev_2.html\"><strong>Prime TV<\/strong><\/a> a difuzat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri despre negocierile dintre PSRM \u0219i Blocul ACUM: una dintre ele s-a referit la reuniunea celor dou\u0103 entit\u0103\u021bi politice, iar a doua a inclus opiniile unor exper\u021bi pe marginea negocierilor. Informa\u021bia a fost reflectat\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod dezechilibrat \u0219i tenden\u021bios. PSRM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid au fost prezenta\u021bi \u00eentr-un context neutru, iar membrii Blocului ACUM &#8211; \u00eentr-un context exclusiv negativ. <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a admis \u00een cele dou\u0103 \u0219tiri difuzate:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><iframe style=\"border: 0px;\" src=\"https:\/\/www.prime.md\/ro\/embed\/149412\" width=\"770\" height=\"433\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong> <em>\u201eNegocierile au e\u0219uat\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201eInterese voalate\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Etichet\u0103ri repetitive:<\/strong> <em>\u201eDiscu\u021biile dintre PSRM \u0219i binomul PAS-PPDA privind crearea majorit\u0103\u021bii parlamentare au e\u0219uat\u201d; \u201eDe\u0219i cei de la binomul PAS-PPDA au spus c\u0103 nu sunt interesa\u021bi de func\u021bii, \u00een timpul \u00eentrevederii&#8230;\u201d; \u201eDe aceast\u0103 p\u0103rere sunt mai mul\u021bi anali\u0219ti politici care au comentat negocierile e\u0219uate dintre binomul PAS-PPDA \u0219i PSRM\u201d; \u201e&#8230;iar analistul politic Corneliu Ciurea consider\u0103 c\u0103 binomul PAS-PPDA a \u00eenaintat condi\u021bii exagerate\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Selectarea unilateral\u0103 \u0219i tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a opiniilor.<\/strong> <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a inclus doar opiniile unor exper\u021bi care, exclusiv, au afirmat \u0219i au sus\u021binut c\u0103 discu\u021biile \u0219i negocierile dintre PSRM \u0219i Blocul ACUM au e\u0219uat.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen perioada vizat\u0103 de acest studiu de caz, (11-13 aprilie 2019),<strong> Canal 3<\/strong> nu a reflectat \u00een nici un buletin de \u0219tiri subiectul negocierilor dintre PSRM \u0219i Blocul ACUM, ceea ce poate fi calificat drept <strong>omisiune<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/22258\"><strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong><\/a> a prezentat subiectul dispropor\u021bionat \u0219i tenden\u021bios, reflect\u00e2nd Blocul ACUM \u0219i pe reprezentan\u021bii acestei forma\u021biuni \u00een context negativ, \u00een timp ce PSRM a ap\u0103rut \u00een context exclusiv pozitiv. Astfel, \u00een timp ce reprezentan\u021bii Blocului ACUM au venit <em>\u201etotal nepreg\u0103ti\u021bi\u201d<\/em>, <em>\u201eau f\u0103cut declara\u021bii populiste\u201d \u0219i<\/em> <em>\u201eau recurs la atacuri verbale\u201d<\/em>, cei ai PSRM \u0219i-au dorit un dialog constructiv. Totodat\u0103, <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a mai admis:<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/wstI1OdazKg?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong> <em>\u201e&#8230;iar fa\u021b\u0103 de principalele func\u021bii \u00een stat, Blocul ACUM a \u021binut mor\u021bi\u0219, Andrei N\u0103stase &#8211; pre\u0219edinte de Parlament, iar Maia Sandu &#8211; \u0219efa Guvernului. Sociali\u0219tii s\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 func\u021bii&#8230;\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Timp de emisie dispropor\u021bionat pentru opinii\/declara\u021bii.<\/strong> PSRM a avut parte de timp de emisie dublu pentru opiniile \u0219i declara\u021biile reprezentan\u021bilor s\u0103i, \u00een timp ce exponen\u021bii Blocului ACUM au fost defavorizat \u00een acest sens, beneficiind de spa\u0163iu de emisie mult mai mic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=58219\"><strong>Accent TV<\/strong><\/a> a difuzat trei \u0219tiri despre negocierile dintre PSRM \u0219i Blocul ACUM. Informa\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103 dezechilibrat \u0219i tenden\u021bios. PSRM a fost prezentat \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103, drept un partid constructiv, \u00een timp ce reprezentan\u021bii Blocului ACUM &#8211; \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 exclusiv negativ\u0103. <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a recurs la:<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/sDbABv_Lj-w?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong> <em>\u201e\u00centrevederea a \u00eenceput prin faptul c\u0103 negociatorii de la Blocul ACUM au constatat c\u0103 nivelul de \u00eencredere dintre p\u0103r\u021bile de negociere este de zero. Negociatorii au \u00eencercat \u00een mod constant s\u0103 ob\u021bin\u0103 de la sociali\u0219ti un r\u0103spuns la se pare c\u0103 singura \u00eentrebare care \u00eei intereseaz\u0103&#8230;\u201d; \u201eS-a dovedit c\u0103 negociatorii din partea Blocului ACUM nici nu au \u00eencercat s\u0103 fac\u0103 cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 cu propunerile sociali\u0219tilor\u201d; \u201eDup\u0103 cum s-a dovedit, motivul pentru o asemenea preg\u0103tire a reprezenta\u021bilor Blocului ACUM este destul de simpl\u0103: ei nu doresc s\u0103 formeze o majoritate parlamentar\u0103, nici crearea unei coali\u021bii cu o ulterioar\u0103 alegere a Guvernului\u201d; \u201ePozi\u021bia Blocului ACUM a fost f\u0103cut\u0103 praf \u0219i de Ghenadie Vaculovschi&#8230;\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Neasigurarea dreptului la replic\u0103.<\/strong> \u00cen \u0219tirea despre declara\u021biile post-eveniment ale celor dou\u0103 entit\u0103\u021bi politice, pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 faptul c\u0103 i s-a oferit spa\u021biu de emisie pentru declara\u021bii doar PSRM-ului, <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> nu i-a asigurat Blocului ACUM dreptul la opinie\/replic\u0103. Mai ales c\u0103 reprezentan\u021bii PSRM au acuzat \u0219i au vizat direct Blocul ACUM de <em>\u201enepreg\u0103tire\u201d<\/em>, <em>\u201enecunoa\u0219tere\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Selectarea unilateral\u0103 \u0219i tenden\u021bioas\u0103 a opiniilor.<\/strong> <strong>Accent TV<\/strong> a inclus doar opiniile unor exper\u021bi care au afirmat \u0219i au sus\u021binut c\u0103 PSRM <em>\u201ea dat dovad\u0103 de deschidere \u0219i maxim\u0103 flexibilitate\u201d<\/em>, \u00een timp ce <em>\u201eopozi\u021bia Blocului ACUM este rupt\u0103 de realitate \u0219i nu corespunde a\u0219tept\u0103rilor aleg\u0103torilor s\u0103i\u201d<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Titluri tenden\u021bioase\/Generaliz\u0103ri:<\/strong> <em>\u201eExper\u021bii au f\u0103cut praf \u0219i pulbere pozi\u021bia Blocului ACUM\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=zwik63tt3Vo&amp;t=2s\"><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong><\/a> a prezentat subiectul \u00een buletinul de \u0219tiri principal din ziua evenimentului. Aceast\u0103 institu\u021bie media a folosit <strong>titluri ironice \u0219i tenden\u021bioase<\/strong>: <em>\u201eSup\u0103r\u0103ri, voci ridicate \u0219i t\u00e2rg de func\u021bii. A\u0219a s-a desf\u0103\u0219urat prima \u00eent\u00e2lnire dintre PSRM-ACUM\u201d<\/em>; \u0219i a f\u0103cut t<strong>rimitere la surse imposibil de verificat (vagi), inclusiv transfer de imagine negativ\u0103: <\/strong><em>\u201eDe asemenea, ace\u0219tia [exper\u021bii \u0219i anali\u0219tii politici, n.a.] au mai subliniat c\u0103 Blocul ACUM a fost creat pentru a-i salva de la \u00eenchisoare pe Filat, Platon \u0219i \u021aopa\u201d<\/em>. \u00a0Odat\u0103 cu tirajarea acestor acuza\u021bii (chiar dac\u0103 ele au fost enun\u021bate de \u201e<em>unii exper\u021bi<\/em>\u201d), <strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> era obligat\u0103 s\u0103 ofere \u0219i dreptul la replic\u0103 pentru reprezentan\u021bii Blocului ACUM, ceea ce institu\u021bia media vizat\u0103 nu a f\u0103cut.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/zwik63tt3Vo?start=2&#038;feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/protv.md\/jurnale-de-stiri\/stirile-pro-tv-de-la-ora-20-00-cu-sorina-obreja-11-04-2019---2489017.html\"><strong>PRO TV Chi\u0219in\u0103u<\/strong><\/a> a reflectat subiectul \u00een buletinul principal de \u0219tiri din 11 aprilie 2019. Informa\u021bia a fost prezentat\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant, <strong>PRO TV Chi\u0219in\u0103u<\/strong> neadmi\u021b\u00e2nd \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri ale normelor deontologice sau folosirea unor tehnici de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/tv8.md\/tv8-show\/stiri-cu-angela-gonta-hd-11-04-19\/\"><strong>TV8<\/strong><\/a> a reflectat, \u00een mare parte, neutru \u0219i echidistant subiectul negocierilor dintre PSRM \u015fi Blocul ACUM. Totu\u0219i, \u00een unele cazuri, <strong>TV8<\/strong> a admis <strong>elemente de ironie<\/strong>: <em>\u201eMinunea s-a produs. Pentru prima dat\u0103 Blocul ACUM \u0219i PSRM s-au v\u0103zut fa\u021b\u0103 \u00een fa\u021b\u0103, \u00eens\u0103 discu\u021biile s-au soldat doar cu fraze t\u0103ioase aruncate peste mas\u0103\u201d<\/em>; \u0219i formul\u0103ri care pot fi calificate drept <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201e&#8230;cei din ACUM au p\u0103rut \u00eens\u0103 nepreg\u0103ti\u021bi\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/B3Rn48MhZAQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-11-aprilie-2019\">\u00cen \u201eMesager\u201d-ul din 11 aprilie 2019<\/a>, <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i echidistant. Televiziunea public\u0103 a admis totu\u0219i un caz ce poate fi calificat drept <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201e&#8230;\u00een scurt timp discu\u021biile au degenerat \u00een certuri\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/c9fa2b28eefcbb65\/jurnalul-orei-19-11-aprilie.html\"><strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong><\/a> a reflectat informa\u021bia \u00eentr-un mod neutru, echidistant \u0219i oferindu-le tuturor actorilor implica\u021bi spa\u021biu de emisie pentru declara\u021bii. \u00cen cazul acestei institu\u021bii media nu au fost consemnate anumite \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri deontologice \u0219i\/sau folosirea unor anumite tehnici de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p><iframe src=\"http:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/embed\/c9fa2b28eefcbb65\" width=\"650\" height=\"370\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a publicat dou\u0103 \u0219tiri despre negocierile dintre PSRM \u0219i Blocul ACUM. <a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20190411\/25458752\/Punct-Coalitie-PSRM--Blocul-ACUM-nu-va-fi.html\">Una din ele<\/a> (<em>\u201eDecis: Coali\u021bia<a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/sputnik.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-10723 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/sputnik-350x187.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"399\" height=\"213\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/sputnik-350x187.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/sputnik.jpg 903w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 399px) 100vw, 399px\" \/><\/a> PSRM &#8211; Blocul ACUM nu va fi\u201d<\/em>) s-a referit la \u00eent\u00e2lnirea din 11 aprilie 2019 a celor dou\u0103 entit\u0103\u021bi politice, iar <a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/politics\/20190411\/25448166\/Ce-scopuri-urmareste-blocul-ACUM.html\">a doua<\/a> (<em>\u201eCe scopuri urm\u0103re\u0219te, de fapt, Blocul ACUM\u201d<\/em>) a expus opinia unui analist politic (Valeriu Reni\u021b\u0103) pe marginea negocierilor. <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a f\u0103cut uz de <strong>tehnica de manipulare a informa\u021biei prioritare<\/strong>, men\u021bion\u00e2nd \u00een titlul unei \u0219tiri o opinie &#8211; \u201e<em>Decis: Coali\u021bia PSRM &#8211; Blocul ACUM nu va fi\u201d<\/em> &#8211; \u015fi doar ulterior, \u00een informa\u021bia prezentat\u0103 \u00een corpul \u0219tirii, a men\u021bionat c\u0103 cele discutate de c\u0103tre reprezentan\u021bii PSRM \u0219i cei ai Blocului ACUM vor fi expuse \u0219i analizate <em>\u201e\u00een cadrul Consiliului Republican al PSRM\u201d<\/em>. \u00cen acela\u0219i sens, <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a recurs \u0219i la <strong>amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>, prezent\u00e2nd o opinie drept un adev\u0103r de ultim\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103: <em>\u201eDecis: Coali\u021bia PSRM &#8211; Blocul ACUM nu va fi\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kp.md<\/strong> nu a avut con\u021binut propriu la subiectul monitorizat. Totu\u0219i, <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3444949\/\">preluat<\/a> \u0219i re-publicat <a href=\"http:\/\/socialistii.md\/ru\/respublikanskij-sovet-psrm-rassmotrit-itogi-vstrechi-predstavitelej-psrm-i-bloka-acum\/\">un comunicat oficial<\/a> al PSRM, precum \u0219i patru \u0219tiri &#8211; toate preluate de pe <strong>AiF.md<\/strong>. Prin modul de selectare, dar \u0219i sursele din care a fost preluat\u0103 informa\u021bia, se poate conchide c\u0103 redac\u021bia <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a reflectat p\u0103rtinitor \u015fi tenden\u021bios evenimentul monitorizat: toate \u0219tirile \u0219i informa\u021bia preluat\u0103 a tratat \u00een context exclusiv negativ Blocul ACUM \u0219i \u00eentr-un mod neutru \u0219i\/sau pozitiv PSRM \u0219i pe reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a difuzat <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/ae54e572dc4f28db\/live-partidul-socialistilor-din-republica-moldova-si-blocul-acum-la-masa-de-discutii.html?utm_source=Site%20Widgets&amp;utm_medium=Trend%20News%20Widget&amp;utm_campaign=Trend%20News%20Widget\">imagini \u0219i text live de la evenimentul negocierilor<\/a> dintre PSRM \u0219i Blocul ACUM. Aceast\u0103 institu\u021bie media nu a admis \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri deontologice \u0219i nu a folosit vreo tehnic\u0103 de manipulare \u00een informa\u021bia publicat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>La 10 aprilie 2019, Partidul Sociali\u015ftilor din Republica Moldova a invitat oficial \u00a0grupurile parlamentare ale PPDA \u0219i PAS (Blocul ACUM) la negocieri privind crearea unei coali\u021bii de guvernare. \u00cent\u00e2lnirea s-a produs a doua zi, 11 aprilie 2019, ora 11.00, \u00een sala 508 din anexa Parlamentului, iar la eveniment a avut acces \u0219i presa. Fiecare dintre cele dou\u0103 forma\u021biuni politice au \u00eenaintat o serie de condi\u021bii de baz\u0103. Din partea Blocului ACUM la \u00eentrunire au participat Alexandru Slusari \u015fi Mihai Pop\u015foi, \u00een timp ce PSRM a fost reprezentat de deputa\u021bii Ion Ceban, Garik Vartanean, Vlad B\u0103tr\u00eencea \u015fi Fadei Nagacevschi. Ini\u0163ial, la \u00eentrunire a fost prezent\u0103 \u0219i lidera sociali\u0219tilor, Zinainda Grecean\u00eei, \u00eens\u0103 aceasta a p\u0103r\u0103sit sala \u00eenainte de \u00eenceperea discu\u0163iilor, men\u0163ion\u00e2nd drept argument absen\u021ba, de la acest eveniment, a liderilor Blocului ACUM. \u00cen urma acestei \u00eentruniri, exponen\u021bii PSRM au men\u021bionat c\u0103 vor prezenta cele discutate la negocieri \u00een cadrul \u0219edin\u021bei Consiliului Republican al partidului, care a avut loc a doua zi (12 aprilie 2019). Doar ulterior se va lua o decizie \u00een acest sens. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em><strong>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">_________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Realizarea acestui studiu de caz a fost posibil\u0103 datorit\u0103 suportului generos din partea poporului American \u0219i cel Britanic, prin intermediul Agen\u021biei Statelor Unite pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID) \u0219i al UK Aid. Con\u021binutul acestui material \u021bine de responsabilitatea Centrului pentru Jurnalism Independent \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar viziunea UK Aid, a USAID sau a Guvernului Statelor Unite ale Americii.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Modul \u00een care a fost reflectat subiectul privind negocierile post-electorale dintre Partidul Sociali\u0219tilor din Republica Moldova (PSRM) \u0219i Blocul ACUM &#8211; care au avut loc pe 11 aprilie 2019 &#8211; au oscilat \u00een func\u021bie de preferin\u021bele politice ale celor 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. \u0218i anume, multe dintre ele au tratat subiectul \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":10724,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Alfabetul media al negocierilor post-electorale dintre PSRM \u015fi Blocul ACUM: \u00eentre fapte, opinii, etichet\u0103ri, generaliz\u0103ri \u0219i ironii - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Modul \u00een care a fost reflectat subiectul privind negocierile post-electorale dintre Partidul Sociali\u0219tilor din Republica Moldova (PSRM) \u0219i Blocul ACUM &#8211; care au avut loc pe 11 aprilie 2019 &#8211; au oscilat \u00een func\u021bie de preferin\u021bele politice ale celor 12 institu\u021bii media monitorizate. \u0218i anume, multe dintre ele au tratat subiectul \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219iMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-02T06:40:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-20T14:02:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/cover.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"711\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"350\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/cover.jpg\",\"width\":711,\"height\":350},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Alfabetul media al negocierilor post-electorale dintre PSRM \\u015fi Blocul ACUM: \\u00eentre fapte, opinii, etichet\\u0103ri, generaliz\\u0103ri \\u0219i ironii - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-02T06:40:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-20T14:02:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-alfabetul-media-al-negocierilor-post-electorale-dintre-psrm-si-blocul-acum-intre-fapte-opinii-etichetari-generalizari-si-ironii\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10722"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10722"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10722\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10815,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10722\/revisions\/10815"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}