{"id":10439,"date":"2019-03-05T08:33:42","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T08:33:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mediacritica.md\/?p=10439"},"modified":"2019-03-29T10:13:21","modified_gmt":"2019-03-29T10:13:21","slug":"studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Studiu de caz. Rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare \u00een vizorul presei sau cum au num\u0103rat procentele \u0219i mandatele cele 12 institu\u021bii media"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>Rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare din 24 februarie 2019 au fost prezentate de <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-10334\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"505\" height=\"424\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto.png 940w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cover-foto-350x293.png 350w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a>cele 12 institu\u021bii media \u00een func\u021bie de preferin\u021bele lor politice. Astfel, pentru unii, c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103tori ai scrutinului au fost PDM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestei forma\u021biuni (Prime TV, Canal 3); pentru al\u021bii \u00eenving\u0103tor a fost PSRM (NTV Moldova, Accent TV); \u00een timp ce pentru o a treia categorie (Televiziunea Central\u0103), Partidul Politic \u201e\u0218or\u201d cu cele \u0219apte mandate a cucerit deta\u0219at Orheiul \u0219i, prin extensie, \u00eentreaga \u021bar\u0103 (asta dac\u0103 analiz\u0103m importan\u021ba \u0219i timpii de emisie atribuit acestei forma\u021biuni politice). Principala constatare \u00een acest sens este c\u0103 mass-media, pentru c\u00e2teva zile, au luat locul Comisiei Electorale Centrale (CEC) \u0219i s-au ocupat de \u00eemp\u0103r\u021birea mandatelor de deputat dup\u0103 bunul lor plac \u0219i&#8230; culoarea politic\u0103 a proprietarilor. La fel cre\u0219tea \u0219i\/sau se mic\u0219ora \u0219i num\u0103rul deputa\u021bilor. La faza ini\u021bial\u0103, cifrele au oscilat de la o institu\u021bie media la alta: pentru cele afiliate PDM acest partid a luat 31 de mandate; pentru cele apropiate PPDA, Blocul electoral ACUM avea 27 de deputa\u021bi; media apar\u021bin\u00e2nd lui Ilan \u0218or erau convinse c\u0103 partidul acestuia are opt deputa\u021bi \u00een viitorul Parlament, iar cele ce sus\u021bin PSRM speculau cu cifra de 35-36 de deputa\u021bi. Diferite au fost \u0219i \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rile deontologice \u0219i tehnicile de manipulare la care s-a recurs &#8211; de la amestecul faptelor cu opiniile (\u00eenc\u0103lcare admis\u0103 de toate institu\u021biile media, cu excep\u021bia Moldova 1, PRO TV Chi\u0219in\u0103u \u0219i TV8) p\u00e2n\u0103 la cazuri de estomp\u0103ri, etichet\u0103ri, sugestii \u0219i informa\u021bii false.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.prime.md\/ro\/emisiune\/primele-stiri_2514_video_87537.html\">Prime TV<\/a><\/strong> a reflectat rezultatele alegerilor \u00een principalul buletin de \u0219tiri din 25 februarie, \u00eentr-un mod lipsit de <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/prime-tv.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-10441\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/prime-tv-350x182.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"182\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/prime-tv-350x182.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/prime-tv.jpg 776w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a>neutralitate \u0219i echidistan\u021b\u0103, pun\u00e2nd accentul pe scorurile luate de PDM \u0219i Partidul \u201e\u0218or\u201d \u00een circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i de exponen\u021bii acestor forma\u021biuni \u00een circumscrip\u021biile uninominale. \u00cen cazul celorlalte partide &#8211; ex., PSRM, Blocul electoral ACUM &#8211; rezultatele au fost prezentat tenden\u021bios, fie \u00een context negativ, fie diminu\u00e2nd din importan\u021ba scorului luat de acestea. Spre exemplu, <strong>dac\u0103<\/strong> <em>\u201eliderul PDM, Vladimir Plahotniuc, ini\u021biatorul \u0219i promotorul sistemului mixt de vot, este unul dintre candida\u021bii care a beneficiat de sus\u021binerea masiv\u0103 a locuitorilor din Nisporeni&#8230; \u0218i premierul Pavel Filip a avut sus\u021binerea aleg\u0103torilor din raionul s\u0103u de ba\u0219tin\u0103\u201d<\/em>, <strong>iar<\/strong> <em>\u201eIlan \u0218or a c\u00e2\u0219tigat deta\u0219at \u00een circumscrip\u021bia&#8230;\u201d<\/em>, <strong>atunci<\/strong> <em>\u201eMaia Sandu a acumulat aproape 81% din voturi\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a admis <strong>amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201eLiderii Blocului PAS-PPDA, care au criticat sistemul mixt de vot, au beneficiat \u0219i ei de noul sistem. Spre deosebire de mul\u021bi al\u021bi candida\u021bi, cei doi au ales s\u0103 nu lupte pentru fotoliul de deputat \u00een raioanele de ba\u0219tin\u0103\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e\u00cen ciuda faptului c\u0103 Blocul PAS-PPDA este al doilea \u00een circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103, Maia Sandu \u0219i Andrei N\u0103stase declar\u0103 c\u0103 scrutinul a fost fraudat masiv&#8230;\u201d<\/em>. \u00cen plus, postul a f\u0103cut uz de <strong>tehnica sugestiei \u0219i a informa\u021biei prioritare:<\/strong> <em>\u201eV\u0103 prezent\u0103m datele \u00een ordinea \u00een care au fost \u00een buletinele de vot&#8230;\u201d<\/em>. Deci, <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> nu a prezentat rezultatele \u00een ordinea procentelor acumulate (cum a f\u0103cut-o \u00een cazul circumscrip\u021biilor uninominale), ci s-a condus de num\u0103rul din buletinele de vot, manipul\u00e2nd \u0219i suger\u00e2ndu-le consumatorilor media c\u0103 PDM a c\u00e2\u0219tigat \u0219i pe lista na\u021bional\u0103 mai multe voturi dec\u00e2t celelalte partide. A\u0219adar, <strong>Prime TV<\/strong> a prezentat p\u0103rtinitor rezultatele, pentru a scoate \u00een prim-plan PDM ca \u0219i forma\u021biune politic\u0103 \u0219i a-l prezenta \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103 \u0219i \u00een acest caz: <em>\u201e&#8230;cele mai multe mandate de deputat revenindu-le deputa\u021bilor \u0219i sociali\u0219tilor&#8230;\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/canal-3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-10442 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/canal-3-350x204.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"393\" height=\"229\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/canal-3-350x204.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/canal-3.jpg 694w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 393px) 100vw, 393px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canal3.md\/ro\/stirile-canal-3-17-00-25-02-2019_85314.html\">Canal 3<\/a><\/strong> a reflectat rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare, folosind acela\u0219i mod de abordare, scenariu, imagini \u0219i text ca \u0219i <strong>Prime TV, <\/strong>pun\u00e2nd accent pe rezultatele PDM \u0219i ale reprezentan\u021bii acestui partid. De asemenea, <strong>Canal 3<\/strong> a relatata \u00eentr-un mod tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103 despre rezultatele altor forma\u021biuni politice (PSRM, Blocul electoral ACUM). Astfel, dac\u0103 <em>\u201eliderul PDM, Vlad Plahotniuc a c\u00e2\u0219tigat deta\u0219at alegerile parlamentare din circumscrip\u021bia cu num\u0103rul 17&#8230; \u0219i el se num\u0103r\u0103 printre candida\u021bii care au acumulat cele mai multe voturi din partea aleg\u0103torilor\u201d<\/em>, <em>\u201e&#8230;fiind votat masiv de locuitorii din Groze\u0219ti, satul s\u0103u de ba\u0219tin\u0103&#8230;\u201d<\/em>, sau <em>\u201ePavel Filip a\u00a0 ob\u021binut&#8230;\u201d<\/em>, atunci reprezentan\u021bii altor partide <em>\u201e&#8230;au fost la mare distan\u021b\u0103 \u00een urm\u0103&#8230;\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>La fel,<strong> Canal 3<\/strong> a omis inten\u021bionat s\u0103 relateze despre rezultatul \u00een cifre luat de Maia Sandu \u00een circumscrip\u021bia Europa de Vest (peste 80%) \u0219i Andei N\u0103stase \u00een circumscrip\u021bia 33 (peste 45%), \u00een schimb, \u00een cazul liderilor PDM care au c\u00e2\u0219tigat \u00een circumscrip\u021bii, a men\u021bionat \u00een detalii scorul \u0219i rezultatele acestora. \u00cen acest sens, <strong>Canal 3<\/strong> a manipulat prin intermediul <strong>tehnicii estomp\u0103rii,<\/strong> limit\u00e2nd accesul la o informa\u021bie corect\u0103 \u0219i echidistant\u0103 pentru consumatorii media. Totodat\u0103, postul a admis cazuri de <strong>etichet\u0103ri &#8211;<\/strong> <em>\u201eIon Tergu\u021b\u0103, reprezentantul Blocului binomului PAS-PPDA\u201d <\/em>&#8211; \u0219i a recurs la <strong>selectarea p\u0103rtinitoare a surselor, <\/strong>\u0219i anume: reprezentan\u021bii PDM au fost inclu\u0219i cu declara\u021bii directe, \u00een timp ce reprezentan\u021bii celorlalte partide fie nu au fost inclu\u0219i deloc, fie doar au fost parafraza\u021bi.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ntv.md\/news\/21676\">NTV Moldova<\/a><\/strong> a reflectat rezultatele preliminare ale campaniei \u00eentr-un mod lipsit de echidistan\u021b\u0103 \u0219i de neutralitate. Astfel, aceast\u0103 televiziune a prezentat masiv \u0219i \u00een detalii rezultatele PSRM \u0219i ale reprezentan\u021bilor respectivului partid, dar mai pu\u021bin sau chiar deloc scorurile acumulate de ceilal\u021bi concuren\u021bi electorali (PDM, Blocul electoral ACUM, Partidul \u201e\u0218or\u201d): <em>\u201ePSRM, cel mai mare scor electoral&#8230;\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201e&#8230;\u00een circumscrip\u021bia 1, Zinaida Grecean\u00eei a ob\u021binut o victorie categoric\u0103&#8230;\u201d<\/em> (<strong>amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>); <em>\u201ePSRM a mai \u00eenregistrat victorii \u00een circumscrip\u021biile&#8230; F\u0103le\u0219ti, Ocni\u021ba, R\u00e2\u0219cani&#8230; \u0219i ambele circumscrip\u021bii din B\u0103l\u021bi&#8230;\u201d<\/em>. \u0218i dac\u0103, \u00een cazul rezultatelor preliminare ob\u021binute de PSRM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii sociali\u0219tilor, <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong> a difuzat trei \u0219tiri, atunci scorurile celorlalte forma\u021biuni \u0219i declara\u021biile liderilor acestora au \u00eenc\u0103put \u00eentr-o singur\u0103 \u0219tire.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Ov4vYPmZTq4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/a-tv.md\/index.php?newsid=56225\">Accent TV<\/a><\/strong> a reflectat rezultatele scrutinului, utiliz\u00e2nd acela\u0219i scenariu, text, imagini \u0219i mod de abordare ca \u0219i <strong>NTV Moldova<\/strong>. La fel, a insistat masiv pe rezultatele detaliate ale PSRM, \u00een schimb, a prezentat \u00eentr-un mod foarte general rezultatele ob\u021binute de celelalte partide (PDM, Blocul electoral ACUM, Partidul \u201e\u0218or\u201d): <em>\u201e&#8230;celelalte circumscrip\u021bii au fost \u00eemp\u0103r\u021bite de PDM, Blocul electoral ACUM \u0219i candida\u021bi independen\u021bi\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/drUNXWqhP2M?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=g6OFZrummQY\">Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/a><\/strong> a reflectat tenden\u021bios \u0219i lipsit de neutralitate rezultatele alegerilor &#8211; \u00een mod exclusiv pozitiv Partidul \u201e\u0218or\u201d \u0219i neutru PDM, \u0219i \u00een context exclusiv negativ PSRM \u0219i Blocul electoral ACUM. Astfel, postul TV \u0219i-a demonstrat lipsa de echidistan\u021b\u0103 \u00een procesul de informare. De asemenea, institu\u021bia media a admis <strong>falsuri \u0219i, \u00een c\u00e2teva r\u00e2nduri, a prezentat gre\u0219it cifrele<\/strong>: atunci c\u00e2nd a men\u021bionat, spre exemplu &#8211; verbal, dar \u0219i grafic &#8211; c\u0103 PDM a ob\u021binut 34 de mandate \u00een viitorul Parlament, iar PSRM &#8211; 31, c\u00e2nd de fapt era invers. La fel, <strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> a admis cazuri de <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201eTrebuie remarcat faptul c\u0103, conform statisticilor, alegerile parlamentare din 2019 s-au dovedit a fi cele mai nepopulare \u00een r\u00e2ndul cet\u0103\u021benilor. Prezen\u021ba aleg\u0103torilor a fost cea mai sc\u0103zut\u0103 dup\u0103 proclamarea independen\u021bei Republicii Moldova&#8230;\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"865\" height=\"487\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/g6OFZrummQY?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> a mai admis:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Sugestia\/amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong> <em>\u201ePotrivit CEC, diaspora, de asemenea, nu a fost prea activ\u0103. De exemplu, \u00een circumscrip\u021bia nr. 50, unde potrivit datelor preliminare a c\u00e2\u0219tigat Maia Sandu, prezen\u021ba la vot a fost mai mic\u0103 dec\u00e2t la alegerile preziden\u021biale din 2016. De\u0219i ea a acumulat peste 80%, aceste procente sunt parte a unui num\u0103r foarte mic de votan\u021bi\u201d<\/em>. A\u0219adar, <strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> a sugerat (<strong>tehnica sugestiei<\/strong>) c\u0103 scorul Maiei Sandu nu e reprezentativ. \u00cen schimb, <em>\u201eIlan \u0218or \u0219i Marina Tauber au c\u00e2\u0219tigat deta\u0219at alegerile pentru circumscrip\u021biile din Orhei. Ace\u0219tia i-au devansat pe candida\u021bii Blocului ACUM, Valeriu Munteanu \u0219i Mariana Cu\u0219nir, precum \u0219i pe democra\u021bii Tudor Golub \u0219i Vasile Costin\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Prezentarea selectiv\u0103 a informa\u021biei \u0219i datelor:<\/strong> \u00cen circumscrip\u021biile unde Partidul \u201e\u0218or\u201d a c\u00e2\u0219tigat alegerile, <strong>Televiziunea Central\u0103<\/strong> a reflectat \u00een detalii rezultatele votului aleg\u0103torilor, \u00een schimb, \u00een localit\u0103\u021bile \u00een care aceast\u0103 forma\u021biune politic\u0103 a \u00eenregistrat scoruri modeste, institu\u021bia nici m\u0103car nu a men\u021bionat despre \u00eenving\u0103tori.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201ePrin rezultatele ob\u021binute, liderul Partidului \u201e\u0218or\u201d a confirmat \u00eenc\u0103 o dat\u0103 \u00eencrederea oamenilor \u0219i recuno\u0219tin\u021ba lor pentru toate proiectele de succes realizate \u00een ultimii trei ani&#8230; Semn c\u0103 toate schimb\u0103rile pozitive vor avea continuitate, iar \u00een viitor urmeaz\u0103 construc\u021bia altor locuin\u021be sociale, magazine sociale, reconstruc\u021bia gr\u0103dini\u021belor, reabilitatea drumurilor&#8230;\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Falsuri<\/strong>: <em>\u201eZinaida Grecean\u00eei a acumulat pu\u021bin peste 14%&#8230;\u201d<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jurnaltv.md\/news\/23f41b5a34b7a802\/jurnalul-orei-19-25-februarie.html\">\u00cen buletinul principal al zilei de 25 februarie 2019<\/a>, <strong>Jurnal TV<\/strong> a difuzat patru \u0219tiri despre rezultatele preliminare ale <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/jurnal.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-10443\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/jurnal-350x175.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"175\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/jurnal-350x175.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/jurnal.jpg 731w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a>alegerilor parlamentare, \u00een cadrul c\u0103rora a prezentat \u00eentr-un mod pozitiv Blocul electoral ACUM \u0219i pe exponen\u021bii acestuia, \u0219i de o manier\u0103 neutr\u0103 \u0219i\/sau negativ\u0103 celelalte forma\u021biuni. Postul TV a admis \u0219i cazuri de <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em>\u201e\u00cen circumscrip\u021bia SUA-Canda a c\u00e2\u0219tigat la fel exponentul Blocului ACUM, Dumitru Alaiba, cu peste 50%, \u00een timp ce candidatul sus\u021binut de guvernare a acumulat 24%\u201d<\/em>; <em>\u201eSistemul mixt de vot adoptat de PDM \u0219i PSRM a adus roade electorale doar unuia dintre cei doi actori politici. Rezultatele alegerilor de ieri arat\u0103 c\u0103 singura forma\u021biune politic\u0103 ce a avut de c\u00e2\u0219tigat de pe urma schimb\u0103rii sistemului electoral este PDM, care va ob\u021bine mai multe mandate dec\u00e2t scorul pe lista na\u021bional\u0103&#8230;\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Postul public <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/trm.md\/ro\/mesager\/mesager-din-25-februarie-2019\">Moldova 1<\/a><\/strong> a reflectat mai \u00eent\u00e2i rezultatele preliminare pe circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i apoi cele pe circumscrip\u021biile uninominale. <strong>Moldova 1<\/strong> a prezentat informa\u021bia \u00een mod echidistant \u0219i neutru, neadmi\u021b\u00e2nd \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri ale normelor deontologice \u0219i folosirea unor tehnici de manipulare. \u0218i <strong>PRO TV Chi\u0219in\u0103u<\/strong>, \u00een <a href=\"http:\/\/protv.md\/stiri\/jurnale-de-stiri\/stirile-pro-tv-de-la-ora-20-00-cu-sorina-obreja-25-02-2019---2494971.html\">principalul buletin de \u0219tiri din 25 februarie 2019<\/a>, a reflectat rezultatele \u00een mod neutru \u0219i echidistant, atribuind timpi egali de emisie pentru toate partidele care au c\u00e2\u0219tigat mandate de deputat pe circumscrip\u021biile na\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i cele uninominale. La fel a procedat <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/tv8.md\/tv8-show\/stiri-cu-angela-gonta-hd-25-02-19\/\">TV8<\/a><\/strong> &#8211; a reflectat rezultatele neutru \u0219i echidistant, f\u0103r\u0103 a admite \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri deontologice sau utilizarea tehnicilor de manipulare.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/sputnik.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-10444 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/sputnik-350x190.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"190\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/sputnik-350x190.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/sputnik.jpg 897w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a>\u00cen cazul <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> au fost selectate \u0219i analizate 22 de \u0219tiri care au reflectat rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor at\u00e2t pe circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103, c\u00e2t \u0219i pe cele uninominale. <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a prezentat \u00eentr-o imagine exclusiv pozitiv\u0103 PSRM \u0219i Partidul \u201e\u0218or\u201d, \u00een timp ce celelalte forma\u021biuni politice au ap\u0103rut \u00een context fie neutru, fie negativ (PDM, Blocul electoral ACUM, PL). \u00cen unele \u0219tiri, <strong>Sputnik.md<\/strong> a admis <strong>manipul\u0103ri prin intermediul titlurilor<\/strong>: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/elections2019\/20190225\/24952199\/Gagauzia-socialistii-au-castigat-alegerile.html\">\u201e\u00cen G\u0103g\u0103uzia, sociali\u0219tii au c\u00e2\u0219tigat cu o majoritate cov\u00e2r\u0219itoare\u201d<\/a><\/em>; <em><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/elections2019\/20190224\/24932894\/Infrngere-grea-pentru-Dorin-Chirtoaca-A-pierdut-in-fata-Ninei-Costiuc-primar-de-Budesti.html\">\u201e\u00cenfr\u00e2ngere grea pentru Dorin Chirtoac\u0103: A pierdut \u00een fa\u021ba candidatului ACUM, Mihai Pop\u0219oi\u201d<\/a><\/em><em>,<\/em> dar \u0219i <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/society\/20190224\/24927857\/Alegeri-parlamentare-2019-Ilan-sor-castiga-detasat-in-circumscriptia-Orhei.html\">\u201eRezultatele preliminare prezentate de Comisia Electoral\u0103 Central\u0103 arat\u0103 clar c\u0103 primarul de Orhei, Ilan \u0218or, conduce deta\u0219at \u00een circumscrip\u021bia 18, Orhei\u201d<\/a><\/em><em>; <a href=\"https:\/\/sputnik.md\/society\/20190224\/24927857\/Alegeri-parlamentare-2019-Ilan-sor-castiga-detasat-in-circumscriptia-Orhei.html\">\u201eAstfel, acum le putem da dreptate sociologilor, care ar\u0103tau \u00een sondajele din campania electoral\u0103 c\u0103 primarul de Orhei va c\u00e2\u0219tiga \u00een aceast\u0103 circumscrip\u021bie. Anali\u0219tii politici \u0219i sociologii, nu i-au dat din start lui Valeriu Munteanu prea multe \u0219anse de c\u00e2\u0219tig, cu toate acestea, candidatul ACUM s-a \u00eenc\u0103p\u0103\u021b\u00e2nat s\u0103 demonstreze c\u0103-l poate \u00eenvinge pe primarul de Orhei, Ilan \u0218or\u201d<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a publicat \u0219apte \u0219tiri \u0219i\/sau reportaje despre rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare. <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/kp.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-10445\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/kp-350x318.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"318\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/kp-350x318.jpg 350w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/kp.jpg 526w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/><\/a>operat, \u00een diferite materiale, cu diferite cifre privind num\u0103rul de mandate ob\u021binute de cele patru forma\u021biuni politice \u00een parte. Astfel, dac\u0103 \u00een unul din articole PSRM a luat 33 mandate \u00een total, atunci \u00een altul s-a men\u021bionat despre 34 mandate, iar \u00een cazul unui al treilea articol s-a operat cu cifra de 35 mandate c\u00e2\u0219tigate de acest partid. F\u0103r\u0103 o verificare prealabil\u0103 a informa\u021biei, publicarea ei poate fi considerat\u0103 drept manipulare a consumatorilor media. De asemenea, <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> a admis cazuri de <strong>amestec al faptelor cu opiniile<\/strong>: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/online\/news\/3397078\/\">\u201eAu devenit cunoscute numele a 48 deputa\u021bi noroco\u0219i\u201d<\/a><\/em><em> (orig. \u201e\u0421\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u044b \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0430 48 \u0441\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043b\u0438\u0432\u0447\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432 &#8211; \u043d\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0445 \u0434\u0435\u043f\u0443\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0432\u201d); <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26946.7\/3997929\/\">\u201eLiderii opozi\u021biei de dreapta \u00ee\u0219i smulg p\u0103rul din cap&#8230;\u201d<\/a> (orig. \u201e\u041b\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0440\u044b \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u043f\u043f\u043e\u0437\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0440\u0432\u0443\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0435\u0431\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0441\u044b &#8211; \u00ab\u041c\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0442\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u044b\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043d\u0443\u044e \u043a\u0430\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044e, \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u043c\u0435\u043d \u043d\u0430 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u043b\u0438, \u0438\u043c \u0437\u0430\u043f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438!\u00bb\u201d<\/em>). Totodat\u0103, multe dintre articolele <strong>Kp.md<\/strong> nu au fost marcate clar din ce categorie fac parte: opinii sau \u0219tiri\/reportaje, cum este cazul al dou\u0103 materiale &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26946.5\/3997947\/\">unul semnat Leonid Reabkov<\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kp.md\/daily\/26947\/3998977\/\">altul de Tatiana Vladimirskaia<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen cazul <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> au fost analizate 17 \u0219tiri ce au reflectat rezultatele alegerilor at\u00e2t pentru unele <a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/unimedia.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-10440 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/unimedia-286x350.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"295\" height=\"361\" srcset=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/unimedia-286x350.jpg 286w, https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/unimedia.jpg 458w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 295px) 100vw, 295px\" \/><\/a>circumscrip\u021bii uninominale, c\u00e2t \u0219i pe circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103. S-a sesizat o reflectare pozitiv\u0103 \u00een favoarea Blocului electoral ACUM \u0219i a reprezentan\u021bilor acestuia, \u0219i o abordare u\u0219or negativ\u0103, iar pe alocuri ironic\u0103, \u00een cazul PDM, al Partidului Politic \u201e\u0218or\u201d \u0219i al PSRM. Pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 aceasta, <strong>Unimedia.info<\/strong> a mai admis \u00een \u0219tirile monitorizate:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><span class=\"_5yl5\">Titluri tendentioanse si ironice<\/span>:<\/strong> <em><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/af28323e1757593b\/cadou-de-ziua-sa-primarul-de-hincesti-a-castigat-un-loc-in-parlament-pe-circumscriptia-nr-38.html\">\u201eCadou de ziua sa? Primarul de H\u00e2nce\u0219ti a c\u00e2\u0219tigat un loc \u00een Parlament pe circumscrip\u021bia nr. 38\u201d<\/a><\/em>; <em><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/a8a407d63ad32827\/independentei-transnistriei-sau-cum-2-politicieni-apropiati-cercurilor-puterii-au-castigat-detasat-alegerile-in-circumscriptiile-din-stanga-nistrului.html\">\u201eIndependen\u021bii Transnistriei\u201d sau cum doi politicieni apropia\u021bi cercurilor Puterii au c\u00e2\u0219tigat deta\u0219at alegerile \u00een circumscrip\u021biile din St\u00e2nga Nistrului\u201d<\/a><\/em>; <em><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/c455c9645eef68e7\/infrangere-zdrobitoare-pentru-monica-babuc-la-ialoveni-candidatul-acum-liviu-vovc-va-reprezenta-circumscriptia-22-in-parlament.html\">\u201e\u00cenfr\u00e2ngere zdrobitoare pentru Monica Babuc la Ialoveni! Candidatul ACUM, Liviu Vovc, va reprezenta circumscrip\u021bia 22 \u00een Parlament\u201d<\/a><\/em>; <em><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/c1631d12b4513a66\/ko-pentru-constantin-tutu-andrei-nastase-il-depaseste-pe-democrat-pe-circumscriptia-nr-33.html\">\u201eKO pentru Constantin \u021au\u021bu: Andrei N\u0103stase, lider pe circumscrip\u021bia nr. 33\u201d<\/a><\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amestecul faptelor cu opiniile:<\/strong> <em>\u201eVotul pare mai neverosimil, dac\u0103 ne uit\u0103m la statisticile alegerilor na\u021bionale pe st\u00e2nga Nistrului. Aici, PSRM c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103 confortabil, adun\u00e2nd peste o jum\u0103tate din num\u0103rul total de voturi, 16 401. La uninominal \u00eens\u0103, de\u0219i a prezentat candida\u021bi, a pierdut lamentabil\u201d; \u201eZvonurile despre sus\u021binerea acestora de c\u0103tre cercurile de putere de la Chi\u0219in\u0103u \u00een str\u00e2ns\u0103 leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu cele de la Tiraspol pot avea un dram de adev\u0103r\u201d; \u201eChiar dac\u0103 apare \u00een Raportul Kroll, Melnic nu a fost anchetat niciodat\u0103 de autorit\u0103\u021bile de la Chi\u0219in\u0103u, beneficiind de protec\u021bia organelor de drept care sunt conduse de exponen\u021bii PDM\u201d<\/em> (\u0218tirea: <a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/a8a407d63ad32827\/independentei-transnistriei-sau-cum-2-politicieni-apropiati-cercurilor-puterii-au-castigat-detasat-alegerile-in-circumscriptiile-din-stanga-nistrului.html\">\u201eIndependen\u021bii Transnistriei\u201d sau cum doi politicieni apropia\u021bi cercurilor Puterii au c\u00e2\u0219tigat deta\u0219at alegerile \u00een circumscrip\u021biile din St\u00e2nga Nistrului<\/a>); <em>\u201eSurpriz\u0103 pe circumscrip\u021bia 22. Ministra Educa\u021biei, Culturii \u0219i Cercet\u0103rii, Monica Babuc, a pierdut categoric alegerile. Asta chiar dac\u0103 \u00een campanie a beneficiat de toat\u0103 resursa administrativ\u0103 posibil\u0103\u201d<\/em> (\u0218tirea: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/c455c9645eef68e7\/infrangere-zdrobitoare-pentru-monica-babuc-la-ialoveni-candidatul-acum-liviu-vovc-va-reprezenta-circumscriptia-22-in-parlament.html\">\u201e\u00cenfr\u00e2ngere zdrobitoare pentru Monica Babuc la Ialoveni! Candidatul ACUM, Liviu Vovc, va reprezenta circumscrip\u021bia 22 \u00een Parlament\u201d<\/a><\/em>);<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ironie<\/strong>: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/unimedia.info\/ro\/news\/c1631d12b4513a66\/ko-pentru-constantin-tutu-andrei-nastase-il-depaseste-pe-democrat-pe-circumscriptia-nr-33.html\">\u201eKO pentru Constantin \u021au\u021bu: Andrei N\u0103stase, lider pe circumscrip\u021bia nr. 33\u201d<\/a><\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong><em>Context:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>La 24 februarie 2019 \u00een Republica Moldova au avut loc alegeri parlamentare. Pentru prima dat\u0103, deputa\u021bii din viitorul Legislativ au fost ale\u0219i \u00een baza sistemului de vot mixt. Rata de participare a fost de pu\u021bin peste 49% &#8211; 1.457.220 de aleg\u0103tori s-au prezentat la urne \u00een circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i 1.441.326 \u00een circumscrip\u021biile uninominale. Potrivit rezultatelor preliminare, anun\u021bate de Comisia Electoral\u0103 Central\u0103 \u00een ziua de 3 martie, pe circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103 PSRM a ob\u021binut 18 mandate, ACUM &#8211; 14 mandate, PDM &#8211; 13, Partidul Politic \u201e\u0218or\u201d &#8211; 5 mandate. Pe circumscrip\u021biile uninominale, PSRM a luat 17 mandate, fiind urmat de ACUM &#8211; 12, PDM &#8211; 17 \u0219i Partidul Politic \u201e\u0218or\u201d &#8211; 2. Trei mandate de parlamentar au fost adjudecate de trei candida\u021bi independen\u021bi.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong><em>Victor Goti\u0219an, cercet\u0103tor media<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>_________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Acest articol este posibil datorit\u0103 ajutorului generos al poporului american oferit prin intermediul Agen\u021biei SUA pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID). Opiniile exprimate apar\u021bin autorilor \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar pozi\u021bia USAID sau a Guvernului SUA.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare din 24 februarie 2019 au fost prezentate de cele 12 institu\u021bii media \u00een func\u021bie de preferin\u021bele lor politice. Astfel, pentru unii, c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103tori ai scrutinului au fost PDM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestei forma\u021biuni (Prime TV, Canal 3); pentru al\u021bii \u00eenving\u0103tor a fost PSRM (NTV Moldova, Accent TV); \u00een timp ce pentru o<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/\" title=\"Mai mult\">Mai mult<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":10446,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v14.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studiu de caz. Rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare \u00een vizorul presei sau cum au num\u0103rat procentele \u0219i mandatele cele 12 institu\u021bii media - Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare din 24 februarie 2019 au fost prezentate de cele 12 institu\u021bii media \u00een func\u021bie de preferin\u021bele lor politice. Astfel, pentru unii, c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103tori ai scrutinului au fost PDM \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii acestei forma\u021biuni (Prime TV, Canal 3); pentru al\u021bii \u00eenving\u0103tor a fost PSRM (NTV Moldova, Accent TV); \u00een timp ce pentru oMai mult\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mediacritica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T08:33:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-29T10:13:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/cover.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"708\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"373\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/\",\"name\":\"Mediacritica\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/cover.jpg\",\"width\":708,\"height\":373},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/\",\"name\":\"Studiu de caz. Rezultatele preliminare ale alegerilor parlamentare \\u00een vizorul presei sau cum au num\\u0103rat procentele \\u0219i mandatele cele 12 institu\\u021bii media - Mediacritica\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-05T08:33:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T10:13:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/studiu-de-caz-rezultatele-preliminare-ale-alegerilor-parlamentare-vizorul-presei-sau-cum-au-numarat-procentele-si-mandatele-cele-12-institutii-media\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/#\/schema\/person\/8692f32a139bbce325bea06e9251c8c8\",\"name\":\"Victoria\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10439"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10439"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10439\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10592,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10439\/revisions\/10592"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.mediacritica.md\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}